Skip to content
Loading map…

Pierced by Lucy / LB Art Studio

4004 Kinsella Way SW Edmonton AB T6W 4J5 · Personal Services

3 inspections

  1. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?
      • No written policies for skin cleansing prior to services and antiseptic use were available.
  2. Risk Management Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 03. Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?
      • No written policies for skin cleansing prior to services and antiseptic use were available.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • Product used for surface disinfection was not approved: it did not have a DIN. Updated on January 24, 2024: The disinfectant used for tools disinfection (MedaCide-FD) did not have a DIN (was not acceptable).
    • 21. Is equipment that is intended to be sterile maintained sterile at the point of use?
      • Critical equipment, including jewelry, was not sterile at the point of use: dry heat sterilizer was used onsite to sterilize jewelry and some critical equipment.
  3. Initial Inspection

    10 infractions

    • 02. Has the operator notified the RHA of the existence of a personal service business, including contact and location information, as well as all personal services currently offered or new personal services that will be offered for facilities and/or special events?
      • The owner of the personal service business did not submit a notification about the business to the Alberta Health Services. It was submitted during the inspection.
    • 03. Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?
      • No written policies for skin cleansing prior to services and antiseptic use were available.
    • 08. Is hand hygiene performed by the personal services worker when required, in a proper manner and are provisions available to perform hand hygiene?
      • Hand sanitizer was unacceptable: it did not have an NPN or DIN and was expired in 2022.
    • 10. Is cleansing and antisepsis of skin and mucous membrane performed in accordance to written procedures and are suitable products being used?
      • Antiseptic wipes used for clients' skin preparation were unacceptable: some did not have NPN or DIN, and some were expired.
    • 12. Are personal services workers at the facility maintaining client records and where applicable, sterility documentation corresponding to that client?
      • 1. No clients' records were available.2. No documentation for sterile equipment was kept with clients' forms.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • Product used for surface disinfection was not approved: it did not have a DIN.
    • 21. Is equipment that is intended to be sterile maintained sterile at the point of use?
      • Critical equipment, including jewelry, was not sterile at the point of use: dry heat sterilizer was used onsite to sterilize jewelry and some critical equipment.
    • 21. Is equipment that is intended to be sterile maintained sterile at the point of use?
      • Some needles (purchased sterile) did not have proper sterility assurance documentation available: no lot number was available.
    • 24. Are waste sharps disposed of properly?
      • No proper puncture-proof container was available for sharps disposal.
    • 30. Is the reprocessing area of a personal service facility that uses reusable equipment properly designed, managed and maintained to ensure the safety of clients?
      • The reprocessing and service area was not separated from living areas (used for other activities).