Skip to content
Loading map…

Vivid Nails

7 - 367 St. Albert Trail St. Albert AB T8N 0R1 · Personal Services

9 inspections

  1. Risk Management Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 27. Is the facility maintained in a visibly clean state and are environmental surfaces cleaned and disinfected properly?
      • ***There was disrepair around the walls by the sinks (reprocessing and hand sink) where the wall had become water damaged.
    • 33. Are general nuisance conditions, other than those noted in other violations, being prevented at this personal services facility (Non-Critical)?
      • ***Mouse droppings were noted in the back area of the facility.Discussed safe clean up of mice droppings (wiping up with damp paper towels and discarding, no sweeping, no vacuuming the droppings).Using a bleach solution to break the trails to discourage mice from following the same routes.
  2. Risk Management Inspection

    13 infractions

    • 03. Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?
      • Written procedures were not available at time of inspection.
    • 05. Are written procedures reviewed and revised when required, and do they meet the requirements set out in the standards?
      • Written procedures templates were printed out but not necessarily understood or completed. There were pages that were not relevant to this facility and pages that were relevant but not completed.Staff procedures were to be documented and followed. This includes for tool washing and disinfecting and is to include the products used, manufacturer's instruction including the contact time. Equipment (ie foot basin) washing and disinfecting procedures, including the products used and manufacturer's instructions including the contact time for those products. Furnishings cleaning procedures (service chairs for pedicures, chairs and furnishings) including manufacturer's instruction and contact time for the products used. It is recommended these procedures be kept together in a binder so that staff can access them when necessary.
    • 06. Do operators and personal services workers comply with the Personal Services Regulation and Standards and do they have the skills and knowledge to perform their duties in a safe and sanitary manner?
      • Feb 2, 2026***Verbal procedure for reprocessing equipment provided by the operator was incorrect. The utensils are allowed to be dried with a paper towel after washing before being put in the disinfectant but then after the disinfectant they are to be air dried. This must be done in a clean and sanitary area (not with the laundry). Jan 30, 2026Operator was not following manufacturer’s instructions for Preempt RTU used on pedicure basins, nor Preempt CS20 used on instruments. Preempt RTU was being diluted despite being a ready-to-use product.Preempt CS20 was being reused for an undetermined period of time without valid, non-expired test strips and without appropriate monitoring or logs to verify solution strength or change frequency. The operator did not verify that disinfectant products and test strips were within expiry and was operating without the required disinfectant products necessary to meet disinfection requirements.The operator demonstrated a lack of due diligence in ensuring that disinfection was conducted in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions. The operator stated the Preempt RTU had been purchased in the summer; however, the container was approximately 1/4 used, which is inconsistent with the frequency of application required for proper disinfection.The operator demonstrated limited understanding of applicable legislation and the responsibilities of an owner/operator.
    • 15. Is reusable equipment handled and stored properly (Critical)?
      • ***Incompatible activities were occurring in sanitary areas of the facility. The reprocessing area was in the laundry room. The sink was beside the washer and dryer.***Storage of single use customer items, reprocessing of reusable tools and equipment and storage of items associated with a personal services facility are not be in the same area as incompatible activities (such as laundry).
    • 17. Is reusable equipment cleaned properly (Critical)?
      • ***Verbal procedure for reprocessing equipment provided by the operator was incorrect. The utensils are allowed to be dried with a paper towel after washing before being put in the disinfectant but then after the disinfectant they are to be air dried. This must be done in a clean and sanitary area (not with the laundry).'Surfaces and containers used to store equipment were not themselves maintained in a clean and sanitary condition.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • Manufacturer’s instruction for use of chemicals are to be available. Recommended that these be kept together in a binder for staff to access and follow for effective use of the chemicals.There was Preempt RTU product present. There were foot basins with water present. When discussing it was explained to the operator that the Preempt RTU could not be used on basins that had water as that would dilute the product. The basins were to be dry before this product was used. PHI R. Thind demonstrated the expected use for the product (thoroughly soaking the surface and having it stay wet for 3 minutes as per the manufacturer's instruction for this ready to use product). There was a spray nozzle present for dispensing this product.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • The manufacturer's instructions for the Lysol wipes was to have the surface wet for 4 minutes, the Lysol spray had a 10 minute contact time. Discussed that if the manufacturer's instructions were not followed the result was not achieved.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • CS20 was being reused for an undetermined amount of time, without proper test strips or records. CS20 may be used up to a period of 14 days as long as it is tested with the coresponding test strips and proper records are kept with the AHS template (see attached). The CS20 solution observed was cloudy and dark and was of insufficient volume to fully submerge instruments. This was disposed of at the request of the PHI and the container was refilled with fresh solution. The PHI instructed the operator Tina to rewash and disinfect all instruments that had been processed with the previous solution of CS20. The Operator initially refused and stated this was the job of the employees. As all employees were with clients, the Operator Tina was ordered to reprocess these items, to ensure their proper disinfection. This was completed.
    • 26. Are cosmetic products appropriate for their intended use and being handled properly?
      • ***The product ingredient list is to be available. When products are repackaged and not kept in the original containers with the proper labels and information, the full information is still to be available. It is recommended that the ingredient lists are placed in a binder and kept onsite for reference when products are repackaged or in case the product labels are damaged/not legible.
    • 27. Is the facility maintained in a visibly clean state and are environmental surfaces cleaned and disinfected properly?
      • ***There were many insanitary surfaces noted throughout the facility (shelving, containers, surfaces etc).***There was disrepair around the walls by the sinks (reprocessing and hand sink) where the wall had become water damaged.***There were concerns with the cloth client chairs. The surfaces could not be maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. Discussed options for cleanable surfaces (many of the staff chairs were cleanable and could be wiped down.***There was moldy cardboard present under the towel warmer.
    • 27. Is the facility maintained in a visibly clean state and are environmental surfaces cleaned and disinfected properly?
      • ***There were belongings and items being stored on the floor (building materials, boxes and containers) that did not allow complete inspection of the area. Ensure that the area is cleared and can be checked for mice or other vermin regularly.
    • 33. Are general nuisance conditions, other than those noted in other violations, being prevented at this personal services facility (Non-Critical)?
      • ***Mouse droppings were noted in the back area of the facility.Discussed safe clean up of mice droppings (wiping up with damp paper towels and discarding, no sweeping, no vacuuming the droppings).Using a bleach solution to break the trails to discourage mice from following the same routes.
    • 33. Are general nuisance conditions, other than those noted in other violations, being prevented at this personal services facility (Non-Critical)?
      • ***Manufacturer's instructions for use and cleaning of all personal service equipment. were not available for review. Ensure all equipment manufacturer's instructions are kept onsite and available for review. It is recommended that a binder be used to keep track of these instructions.
  3. Risk Management Inspection

    6 infractions

    • 03. Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?
      • Written procedures were not available at time of inspection.
    • 06. Do operators and personal services workers comply with the Personal Services Regulation and Standards and do they have the skills and knowledge to perform their duties in a safe and sanitary manner?
      • Operator Tina was not following manufacturer’s instructions for Preempt RTU used on pedicure basins, nor Preempt CS20 used on instruments. Preempt RTU was being diluted despite being a ready-to-use product.Preempt CS20 was being reused for an undetermined period of time without valid, non-expired test strips and without appropriate monitoring or logs to verify solution strength or change frequency. The operator did not verify that disinfectant products and test strips were within expiry and was operating without the required disinfectant products necessary to meet disinfection requirements.The operator demonstrated a lack of due diligence in ensuring that disinfection was conducted in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions. The operator stated the Preempt RTU had been purchased in the summer; however, the container was approximately 1/4 used, which is inconsistent with the frequency of application required for proper disinfection.The operator demonstrated limited understanding of applicable legislation and the responsibilities of an owner/operator.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • CS20 was being reused for an undetermined amount of time, without proper test strips or records. CS20 may be used up to a period of 14 days as long as it is tested with the coresponding test strips and proper records are kept with the AHS template (see attached). The CS20 solution observed was cloudy and dark and was of insufficient volume to fully submerge instruments. This was disposed of at the request of the PHI and the container was refilled with fresh solution. The PHI instructed the operator Tina to rewash and disinfect all instruments that had been processed with the previous solution of CS20. The Operator initially refused and stated this was the job of the employees. As all employees were with clients, the Operator Tina was ordered to reprocess these items, to ensure their proper disinfection. This was completed.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • One bottle of Preempt RTU was observed, which was expired since November 2025. No other high-level disinfectant was available for pedicure basins. The bottle was 3/4 full and did not have a spray nozzle. PHI asked operator Tina how the pedicure basins were being disinfected between clients; Operator stated they diluted the Preempt RTU and put it into a re-used Microban spray bottle. Operator was educated on following manufacturer's instructions. Operator Tina was asked if any of the employees could go purchase more product; she stated only she drove and that she had an appointment in 1.5 hours' time and could not leave. Despite there being more than enough time, she refused to go purchase product. Operator was told that no pedicures could be performed until the proper disinfectant was purchased and was provided a phone number to send a photo to once product was purchased the following morning.
    • 27. Is the facility maintained in a visibly clean state and are environmental surfaces cleaned and disinfected properly?
      • ***There were belongings and items being stored on the floor (building materials, boxes and containers) that did not allow complete inspection of the area. Ensure that the area is cleared and can be checked for mice or other vermin regularly.
    • 33. Are general nuisance conditions, other than those noted in other violations, being prevented at this personal services facility (Non-Critical)?
      • ***Mouse droppings were noted in the back area of the facility.Discussed safe clean up of mice droppings (wiping up with damp paper towels and discarding, no sweeping, no vacuuming the droppings).Using a bleach solution to break the trails to discourage mice from following the same routes.
  4. Initial Inspection

    7 infractions

    • 03. Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?
      • Written procedures were not available at time of inspection.
    • 06. Do operators and personal services workers comply with the Personal Services Regulation and Standards and do they have the skills and knowledge to perform their duties in a safe and sanitary manner?
      • Operator Tina was not following manufacturer’s instructions for Preempt RTU used on pedicure basins, nor Preempt CS20 used on instruments. Preempt RTU was being diluted despite being a ready-to-use product.Preempt CS20 was being reused for an undetermined period of time without valid, non-expired test strips and without appropriate monitoring or logs to verify solution strength or change frequency. The operator did not verify that disinfectant products and test strips were within expiry and was operating without the required disinfectant products necessary to meet disinfection requirements.The operator demonstrated a lack of due diligence in ensuring that disinfection was conducted in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions. The operator stated the Preempt RTU had been purchased in the summer; however, the container was approximately 1/4 used, which is inconsistent with the frequency of application required for proper disinfection.The operator demonstrated limited understanding of applicable legislation and the responsibilities of an owner/operator.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • One bottle of Preempt RTU was observed, which was expired since November 2025. No other high-level disinfectant was available for pedicure basins. The bottle was 3/4 full and did not have a spray nozzle. PHI asked operator Tina how the pedicure basins were being disinfected between clients; Operator stated they diluted the Preempt RTU and put it into a re-used Microban spray bottle. Operator was educated on following manufacturer's instructions. Operator Tina was asked if any of the employees could go purchase more product; she stated only she drove and that she had an appointment in 1.5 hours' time and could not leave. Despite there being more than enough time, she refused to go purchase product. Operator was told that no pedicures could be performed until the proper disinfectant was purchased and was provided a phone number to send a photo to once product was purchased the following morning.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • Multiple sets of nail clippers, cuticle nippers, and cuticle pushers were removed from work stations and rewashed/reprocessed at the request of the PHI, due to being visually unclean and not being stored in a manner that prevents contamination and/or permits knowledge of what is clean vs. used.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • CS20 was being reused for an undetermined amount of time, without proper test strips or records. CS20 may be used up to a period of 14 days as long as it is tested with the coresponding test strips and proper records are kept with the AHS template (see attached). The CS20 solution observed was cloudy and dark and was of insufficient volume to fully submerge instruments. This was disposed of at the request of the PHI and the container was refilled with fresh solution. The PHI instructed the operator Tina to rewash and disinfect all instruments that had been processed with the previous solution of CS20. The Operator initially refused and stated this was the job of the employees. As all employees were with clients, the Operator Tina was ordered to reprocess these items, to ensure their proper disinfection. This was completed.
    • 27. Is the facility maintained in a visibly clean state and are environmental surfaces cleaned and disinfected properly?
      • ***There were belongings and items being stored on the floor (building materials, boxes and containers) that did not allow complete inspection of the area. Ensure that the area is cleared and can be checked for mice or other vermin regularly.
    • 33. Are general nuisance conditions, other than those noted in other violations, being prevented at this personal services facility (Non-Critical)?
      • ***Mouse droppings were noted in the back area of the facility.Discussed safe clean up of mice droppings (wiping up with damp paper towels and discarding, no sweeping, no vacuuming the droppings).Using a bleach solution to break the trails to discourage mice from following the same routes.
  5. Demand Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 02. Has the operator notified the RHA of the existence of a personal service business, including contact and location information, as well as all personal services currently offered or new personal services that will be offered for facilities and/or special events?
      • Personal services notification has not been received due to change of ownership. Information will be included with this report.
    • 27. Is the facility maintained in a visibly clean state and are environmental surfaces cleaned and disinfected properly?
      • ***There were belongings and items being stored on the floor (building materials, boxes and containers) that did not allow complete inspection of the area. Ensure that the area is cleared and can be checked for mice or other vermin regularly.
    • 33. Are general nuisance conditions, other than those noted in other violations, being prevented at this personal services facility (Non-Critical)?
      • ***Mouse droppings were noted in the back area of the facility.Discussed safe clean up of mice droppings (wiping up with damp paper towels and discarding, no sweeping, no vacuuming the droppings).Using a bleach solution to break the trails to discourage mice from following the same routes.
  6. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  7. Monitoring Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?
      • The required written procedure as it applies to the operations of the facility was not observed. AHS template was provided to the operator during inspection.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • High-level disinfectant was not being used to disinfect semi-critical tools. Preempt RTU was in use.Obtain a high-level disinfectant, use the HLD test strips to test poured disinfectant each day re-used and ensure records are kept. The disinfectant must be used according to the manufacturer's instructions including contact time.
  8. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  9. Risk Management Inspection

    4 infractions

    • 03. Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?
      • *** Specific written procedures for personal service workers were not available. Such as client care in the event of an accidental skin cut or puncture.Jan 05, 2024: The required written procedure was still not observed. This outstanding violation must be corrected immediately. A written procedures template will be sent with this report.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • 1. The observed high-level disinfectant (Preempt CS20) had expired.Please purchase a new bottle.2. High-level disinfectant test strips were not observed during inspection. High level disinfectant testing log was also not being kept. Please obtain the required high level disinfectant test strips, ensure the disinfectant is tested each day used and records kept. A copy of high-level disinfectant testing log sheet will be sent with this report.
    • 26. Are cosmetic products appropriate for their intended use and being handled properly?
      • *** Cosmetic bottles were not labeled and did not have a list of ingredients. All cosmetics and spray bottles should be properly labelled.Jan 05, 2024:Some cosmetic bottles were still not labeled. As discussed during inspection, ensure all the bottles are labelled, indicating its content.
    • 33. Are general nuisance conditions, other than those noted in other violations, being prevented at this personal services facility (Non-Critical)?
      • *** Reusable high-level disinfectant was not being tested to confirm minimum effective concentration (MEC).