Skip to content
Loading map…

Wishbone Restaurant Steak House and Tavern

15035 Hwy 50 Caledon ON L7E 3H9 · Restaurant

Official record from Peel Region →

Inspection summary

Wishbone Restaurant Steak House and Tavern has been inspected 5 times by Peel Public Health (Region of Peel) since December 17, 2024. The most recent inspection, on August 27, 2026, recorded 2 infractions.

None of the 5 inspections on record were free of infractions. In the past 12 months there were 2 inspections with 6 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Cleaning and sanitizing, Food temperature control and Handwashing and staff hygiene.

Recent inspections have recorded fewer infractions than earlier ones, so the record is improving.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their violations differently, so we group them by what they mean for food safety. Higher-risk findings are the ones inspectors treat as critical, because they can directly make someone sick.

  • Cleaning and sanitizingHigher risk

    Anything that touches food, such as cutting boards, dishes and utensils, must be washed, rinsed and sanitized. Inspectors check dishwasher temperatures, sanitizer strength and how wiping cloths are stored. Poor sanitizing lets bacteria survive from one use to the next.

    Recorded 2 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on January 13, 2026. For example: Did operator properly maintain food contact surfaces?

  • Food temperature controlHigher risk

    Bacteria multiply fastest between about 4 °C and 60 °C (40 °F to 140 °F). Inspectors check that cold food stays cold, hot food stays hot, cooked food is cooled quickly, and that staff have accurate thermometers. Temperature problems are one of the most common causes of food poisoning, so these are treated as critical findings.

    Recorded 2 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on June 5, 2025. For example: Did operator provide and use accurate and easy-to-read thermometers?

  • Handwashing and staff hygieneHigher risk

    Hands are the main way germs like norovirus move from people to food. Inspectors look for stocked, accessible handwashing sinks, staff washing hands when required, hair restraints, and sick employees being kept away from food. Gaps here can spread illness quickly.

    Recorded 2 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on April 30, 2025. For example: Did operator provide the required supplies at each handwashing station?

  • PestsHigher risk

    Signs of mice, rats, cockroaches or flies, or gaps and clutter that let them get in or hide. Pests carry bacteria and can contaminate food and surfaces, so evidence of activity is treated seriously and usually triggers a follow-up visit.

    Recorded once on August 27, 2026. For example: Did operator protect the premises against the entry of pests and maintain records of all pest control measures?

  • Food safety training and certificationLower risk

    Most jurisdictions require a certified food handler or manager on site, and some require allergen or food-worker training. These findings mean the paperwork or the trained person was missing at the time. They do not by themselves mean food was handled unsafely.

    Recorded 6 times across 4 separate inspections, most recently on January 13, 2026. For example: Did food handler(s) wash hands to prevent contamination of food and/or food contact surfaces? (Significant Risk)

About this data

These results come from Peel Public Health (Region of Peel), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

5 inspections

  1. Required

    2 infractions

    • Did operator maintain the mechanical ventilation system to remove odours, fumes, vapours, smoke and excessive heat?
    • Did operator protect the premises against the entry of pests and maintain records of all pest control measures?
  2. Required

    4 infractions

    • Did operator properly maintain food contact surfaces?
    • Did food handler(s) wash hands to prevent contamination of food and/or food contact surfaces? (Significant Risk)
    • Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?
    • Is at least one food handler/supervisor with valid food handler certification present on-site during every hour of operation?
  3. Complaint

    4 infractions

    • Did the operator process food in a manner that makes it safe to eat? (Significant risk)
    • Did operator provide and use accurate and easy-to-read thermometers?
    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
    • Is at least one food handler/supervisor with valid food handler certification present on-site during every hour of operation?
  4. Required

    4 infractions

    • Did operator provide an adequate number of handwashing stations that are conveniently accessible to food handlers?
    • Did operator provide the required supplies at each handwashing station?
    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
    • Is at least one food handler/supervisor with valid food handler certification present on-site during every hour of operation?
  5. Follow-up

    5 infractions

    • Did operator keep potentially hazardous food out of the temperature danger zone, and provide adequately sized refrigeration and/or hot-holding equipment/space for the safe storage of such food? (Significant risk)
    • Did operator properly maintain food contact surfaces?
    • Did operator provide the required supplies at each handwashing station?
    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
    • Is at least one food handler/supervisor with valid food handler certification present on-site during every hour of operation?

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website