Skip to content
Loading map…

Allan and Jean Millar Centre - Tot Pool

58 Sunset Boulevard Whitecourt AB T7S 1N6 · Aquatic Facility

Official record from Alberta →

Inspection summary

Allan and Jean Millar Centre - Tot Pool has been inspected 17 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since February 16, 2024. The most recent inspection, on October 7, 2026, found no infractions.

11 of 17 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 6 inspections with 3 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Pool and spa water quality and Chemicals and toxic substances.

The last 2 inspections in a row found no infractions. The number of infractions per inspection has stayed roughly the same over time.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for the people using the facility. Higher-risk findings are the ones that could directly cause illness or injury, such as water that is not properly treated.

  • Pool and spa water qualityHigher risk

    For pools, spas and splash pads, inspectors test disinfectant levels, pH and water clarity, and check safety equipment. Water that is not properly treated can spread skin, ear and stomach infections.

    Recorded 4 times across 4 separate inspections, most recently on April 3, 2025. For example: Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?

  • Chemicals and toxic substancesHigher risk

    Pool chemicals such as chlorine and acid must be labelled, stored apart from each other and handled safely. Mixing them by mistake can release toxic gas, so storage and handling problems are treated seriously.

    Recorded once on December 1, 2025. For example: Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?

  • Permits, records and postingLower risk

    Operating permits, water-test logs, posted bather rules and emergency procedures. Daily test logs are how operators show the water was checked and treated between inspections.

    Recorded once on July 28, 2026. For example: Are proper testing, monitoring, and other records being properly maintained?

  • Food safety training and certificationLower risk

    Many jurisdictions require trained pool operators and certified lifeguards. These findings mean required training, certification or staffing records were missing at the time of inspection.

    Recorded once on July 28, 2026. For example: Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

17 inspections

  1. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  2. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  3. Monitoring Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 16. Are proper testing, monitoring, and other records being properly maintained?
      • The facility uses a liquid drop test kit to monitor water chemistry parameters. During the inspection, the reagent used for testing total alkalinity was found to be expired. Staff promptly discarded the expired reagent and replaced it with a new, unexpired product.
    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • A Water Quality Incident Response Plan for fecal contamination events was not available at the time of inspection.Develop, implement, and maintain a Water Quality Incident Response Plan that clearly outlines the procedures for responding to fecal contamination incidents. Ensure all staff are trained on the plan and that a current copy is readily accessible on-site for reference.
  4. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  5. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  6. Monitoring Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • It was observed that: water temperature 33.6 C, ORP 405 mv, Alk 1.53 ppm, pH 7.86, FC 0.04 ppm, TC 0.13 ppm. The operator is aware of the poor chemistry, and the pool is closed. Please investigate and make repairs.
  7. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  8. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  9. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Tot pool sample returned with coliforms. Called the pool operator and it was discussed that the tot pool is closed. Will shock the pool before reopening and resample next week.
  10. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  11. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • The facility shall submit next week.
  12. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  13. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  14. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  15. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Water sample returned with coliforms. One non-critical and one critical result consecutively. Shock pool, re-balance and open. Re-sample next week.
  16. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • HPC measured 110 cfu. Instructed to check chemistry and re-sample next week.
  17. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

Own this business? Add a badge to your website