Allure by Harp
1226 Plum Bend SW Edmonton AB T6X 0S4 · Personal Services
Inspection summary
Allure by Harp has been inspected 3 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since October 7, 2025. The most recent inspection, on October 9, 2025, found no infractions.
1 of 3 inspections on record found no infractions at all. No inspections are on record from the past 12 months. All recorded findings relate to upkeep, equipment or paperwork rather than direct infection-control risks to clients.
What these findings mean
Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for clients. In personal service settings like salons, spas and tattoo studios, higher-risk findings are the ones that could spread infection from one client to the next, through broken skin, blood or instruments that were not properly cleaned and sterilized.
Permits, records and postingLower risk
Operating permits, client records, sterilization logs and required signage. Client records matter because they let health officials contact people if an infection is linked to the business.
Recorded 3 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on October 8, 2025. For example:
Are personal services workers at the facility maintaining client records and where applicable, sterility documentation corresponding to that client?
Equipment and utensilsLower risk
Instruments, chairs, tables and footbaths must be made of materials that can be cleaned, kept in good repair and stored so they stay clean. Single-use items such as nail files, buffers, razors and needles must be thrown away after each client.
Recorded once on October 7, 2025. For example:
Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
About this data
These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.
3 inspections
- Risk Management Inspection
0 infractions
- Risk Management Inspection
1 infraction
- 12. Are personal services workers at the facility maintaining client records and where applicable, sterility documentation corresponding to that client?
- The operator was not maintaining sterility assurance documentation for sterile equipment used in the facility.The operator was advised to keep the record of the lot number, expiry date, and manufacturer's name of the pre-purchased sterile equipment with clients’ information.
- 12. Are personal services workers at the facility maintaining client records and where applicable, sterility documentation corresponding to that client?
- Initial Inspection
3 infractions
- 03. Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?
- Written procedures for client care in case of accidental cut and puncture; cleansing of skin; and applying antiseptic were not available.Ensure the written procedures are developed.
- 12. Are personal services workers at the facility maintaining client records and where applicable, sterility documentation corresponding to that client?
- The operator was not maintaining sterility assurance documentation for sterile equipment used in the facility.The operator was advised to keep the record of the lot number, expiry date, and manufacturer's name of the pre-purchased sterile equipment with clients’ information.
- 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
- A high-level disinfectant was available for the disinfection of semi-critical equipment but was observed to be expired. Another bottle of HLD was available in the facility.Appropriate test strips were not observed during the inspection.Disinfection records were not maintained.+Non-critical equipment was being disinfected using an intermediate level disinfectant with a DIN.
- 03. Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?