Skip to content
Loading map…

Bellus Nails

250 - 4300 South Park Drive Stony Plain AB T7Z 2W7 · Personal Services

Inspection summary

Bellus Nails has been inspected 8 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since January 3, 2024. The most recent inspection, on September 24, 2026, recorded 2 infractions.

2 of 8 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there was 1 inspection with 2 infractions recorded. All recorded findings relate to upkeep, equipment or paperwork rather than direct infection-control risks to clients.

The number of infractions per inspection has stayed roughly the same over time.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for clients. In personal service settings like salons, spas and tattoo studios, higher-risk findings are the ones that could spread infection from one client to the next, through broken skin, blood or instruments that were not properly cleaned and sterilized.

  • Equipment and utensilsLower risk

    Instruments, chairs, tables and footbaths must be made of materials that can be cleaned, kept in good repair and stored so they stay clean. Single-use items such as nail files, buffers, razors and needles must be thrown away after each client.

    Recorded 5 times across 4 separate inspections, most recently on September 24, 2026. For example: Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?

  • Permits, records and postingLower risk

    Operating permits, client records, sterilization logs and required signage. Client records matter because they let health officials contact people if an infection is linked to the business.

    Recorded 3 times across 3 separate inspections, most recently on September 24, 2026. For example: Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?

  • Food safety training and certificationLower risk

    Some jurisdictions require operators to complete infection-prevention training, or to hold specific qualifications for higher-risk services such as tattooing, piercing or electrolysis. These findings mean the training record was missing at the time. They do not by themselves mean a client was put at risk.

    Recorded 2 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on January 2, 2025. For example: Do operators and personal services workers comply with the Personal Services Regulation and Standards and do they have the skills and knowledge to perform their duties in a safe and sanitary manner?

  • Other findingsLower risk

    Findings that do not fit the categories above, such as follow-ups that confirm an earlier violation was corrected, or requirements specific to this type of facility.

    Recorded once on January 13, 2025. For example: Are general nuisance conditions, other than those noted in other violations, being prevented at this personal services facility (Non-Critical)?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

8 inspections

  1. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?
      • -Written procedures are not present and worker did not know where they are
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • -HLD Logs not present-tools at stations had not been cleaned and disinfected immediately after a service-single use items had been left on rotary tool-CS20 was expired-CS20 test strips were expired
  2. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 16. Is reusable equipment handled and stored properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Linen used in the waxing room was not being replaced after each use. The linen was removed upon request. Linen will no longer be used in the waxing room and the waxing bed will be disinfected after each use.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • High level disinfectant testing log was not available. Testing log was sent to operator. Ensure all testing is recording.
  3. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  4. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 33. Are general nuisance conditions, other than those noted in other violations, being prevented at this personal services facility (Non-Critical)?
      • 1. High level disinfectant test strips were expired. Ensure new test strips are obtained2. Intermediate level disinfectant used to disinfect pedicure foot baths was expired. Ensure new product is obtained.
  5. Risk Management Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 05. Are written procedures reviewed and revised when required, and do they meet the requirements set out in the standards?
      • Written procedures are not being reviewed as required, as owner and staff were unsure where the written procedures were when asked. Ensure written procedures are being followed and updated as necessary.
    • 06. Do operators and personal services workers comply with the Personal Services Regulation and Standards and do they have the skills and knowledge to perform their duties in a safe and sanitary manner?
      • Owner and operators did not appear to have the knowledge on how to disinfect equipment properly. More education on how to reprocess reusable items is required. Ensure all staff review the Personal Services Standards and are aware of how to operate this kind of business and how to clean and disinfect reusable equipment properly. Copy of the Personal Services Standard will be emailed with this report.
  6. Monitoring Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 06. Do operators and personal services workers comply with the Personal Services Regulation and Standards and do they have the skills and knowledge to perform their duties in a safe and sanitary manner?
      • Owner and operators did not appear to have the knowledge on how to disinfect equipment properly. More education on how to reprocess reusable items is required.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • 1. Operators were disinfecting semi-critical equipment with intermediate level disinfectant. Semi-critical equipment must be disinfected with high-level disinfectant. PHI instructed owner to get high-level disinfectant immediately and disinfect all equipment properly. PHI asked that all clients are turned away for service until the reusable equipment is all disinfected properly.2. Operators were re-using expired intermediate level disinfectant on non-critical items in waxing room. Intermediate level disinfectant is not to be re-used. The intermediate level disinfectant must have a good date and be used each time when disinfecting non-critical items and surfaces (food baths and tweezer for waxing etc.)
  7. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  8. Monitoring Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?
      • Written procedure for application of antiseptic products was incorrect. Operators had written down that they cleanse the skin with Preempt CS20. Discussed with operator that they do not do this, they wipe the skin down with isopropyl alcohol prior to service. Ensure the written template is updated with the proper procedure. Any antiseptic used must have a DIN or NPN number on the label issued by Health Canada.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • 1. No test strips available to test the Preempt CS20. Ensure test strips are obtained as soon as possible. 2. Operators are not keeping a high level disinfection log with daily testing of the Preempt CS20. A log template will be emailed to owner.
Own this business? Add a badge to your website