Skip to content
Loading map…

Camp Nakamun - Whirlpool

2201 Township Road 570 Busby AB T0G 0H0 · Aquatic Facility

Official record from Alberta →

Inspection summary

Camp Nakamun - Whirlpool has been inspected 28 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since October 24, 2023. The most recent inspection, on July 28, 2026, found no infractions.

16 of 28 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 6 inspections with 2 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Pool and spa water quality and Chemicals and toxic substances.

The number of infractions per inspection has stayed roughly the same over time.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for the people using the facility. Higher-risk findings are the ones that could directly cause illness or injury, such as water that is not properly treated.

  • Pool and spa water qualityHigher risk

    For pools, spas and splash pads, inspectors test disinfectant levels, pH and water clarity, and check safety equipment. Water that is not properly treated can spread skin, ear and stomach infections.

    Recorded 12 times across 10 separate inspections, most recently on July 16, 2026. For example: Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?

  • Chemicals and toxic substancesHigher risk

    Pool chemicals such as chlorine and acid must be labelled, stored apart from each other and handled safely. Mixing them by mistake can release toxic gas, so storage and handling problems are treated seriously.

    Recorded once on October 16, 2024. For example: Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?

  • Food safety training and certificationLower risk

    Many jurisdictions require trained pool operators and certified lifeguards. These findings mean required training, certification or staffing records were missing at the time of inspection.

    Recorded once on October 24, 2023. For example: Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

28 inspections

  1. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  2. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Total coliform bacteria detected in recent sample. When advised of the results, the operator indicated that they had already drained, cleaned, and refilled the hot tub this week after the sample was collected. In lieu of this, operator was asked to continue to monitor chemical levels and submit a sample again next week, as required.
  3. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  4. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  5. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Unsatisfactory water sample result received.Pseudomonas: PresentPrevious week's samples had been satisfactory.Operator asked to submit another sample to verify results.Also review any recent incidents or activities that may have influenced the pool water quality.
  6. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  7. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  8. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Unsatisfactory sample results received for the hot tub.Pseudomonas, total coliforms, and high HPC isolated in the sample.Health inspector spoke with the pool operator who explained that they had an issue at the beginning of the week with the chlorine pump. They had Ecolab out to fix it. Then they drained and cleaned the hot tub on Wednesday (after the sample had been collected). Since they already took recommended action for dealing with unsatisfactory results, the hot tub was allowed to remain open provided all chemical parameters are within operational requirements and another sample be submitted (as required) next week.
  9. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  10. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Unsatisfactory water sample result received.ID: 25EN-191E00351HPC = 420 CFU/mL
  11. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  12. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Unsatisfactory water sample result received.HPC = 140 CFU/mLOperator will submit another sample to verify results. Previous week's samples had been satisfactory.
  13. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  14. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Unsatisfactory water sample result received.Pseudomonas: ISOLATEDOperator will submit another sample to verify results. Previous week's samples had been satisfactory.
  15. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  16. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  17. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Unsatisfactory water sample result received.Total Coliforms: ABSENTPseudomonas: ISOLATEDOperator took corrective action and will submit another sample the following week.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Unsatisfactory water sample result received.HPC: >57000 CFU/mLOperator took corrective action and will submit another sample the following week.
  18. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  19. Monitoring Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Inspectors Manual Test Results:pH : 7.8 FAC: Reading taken 3 times to verify results. FAC was, on average, 9.3ppm according to the health inspectors Pool eXact® EZ Photometer. Please note that there is currently no maximum value for FAC. However, it is recommended that the FAC be reduced.**Staff member was working to balance pool chemistry** Staff ask to monitor the pool chemistry and ensure it is properly balanced before allowing use of the facilities. Automated Controller Readings:ORP: Not observed. Staff member was not sure how to change the setting on the display to view the ORP. pH: Not recently calibrated.
  20. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  21. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Unsatisfactory water sample result received.Submitted on August 21,2024. HPC = 200 CFU/mL
  22. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  23. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  24. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Unsatisfactory water sample result received.Total Coliforms: ABSENTPseudomonas: ISOLATEDOperator took corrective action once results were received. Note that they had already submitted a weekly sample. They cleaned and super chlorinated and submitted another sample one day later.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Unsatisfactory water sample result received.HPC: >57000 CFU/mLOperator took corrective action once results were received. Note that they had already submitted a weekly sample. They cleaned and super chlorinated and submitted another sample one day later.
  25. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  26. Monitoring Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 13. Are the general safety devices and physical conditions in this pool providing a safe environment (Non-Critical)?
      • A clock is available in the pool room; however, it is not visible from all areas of the whirlpool. Please either install a new clock or move the existing clock to a more visible location for users to monitor length of stay.
  27. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  28. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • This facility had contracted the anti-entrapment plan completion. A plan had been submitted to Environmental Public Health for review. Upon review, it has been determined that the plan submitted requires revision. There were several pieces of information that were either incorrect or missing. Details will be provided to the pool operator by email along with this report.
Own this business? Add a badge to your website