Skip to content
Loading map…

Cottage Club Ghost Lake - Whirlpool

501 CottageClub Drive Rocky View County AB T4C 1B1 · Aquatic Facility

Official record from Alberta →

Inspection summary

Cottage Club Ghost Lake - Whirlpool has been inspected 20 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since January 25, 2024. The most recent inspection, on March 18, 2026, found no infractions.

5 of 20 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 2 inspections with 3 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Pool and spa water quality and Chemicals and toxic substances.

The number of infractions per inspection has stayed roughly the same over time.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for the people using the facility. Higher-risk findings are the ones that could directly cause illness or injury, such as water that is not properly treated.

  • Pool and spa water qualityHigher risk

    For pools, spas and splash pads, inspectors test disinfectant levels, pH and water clarity, and check safety equipment. Water that is not properly treated can spread skin, ear and stomach infections.

    Recorded 32 times across 15 separate inspections, most recently on December 1, 2025. For example: Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?

  • Chemicals and toxic substancesHigher risk

    Pool chemicals such as chlorine and acid must be labelled, stored apart from each other and handled safely. Mixing them by mistake can release toxic gas, so storage and handling problems are treated seriously.

    Recorded once on June 21, 2024. For example: Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

20 inspections

  1. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  2. Demand Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Water sample submitted on Nov. 27 was unsatisfactory. Pseudomonas was ISOLATED.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water submitted on July 9 was reported as unsatisfactory. HPC: 210 CFU/mL
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water report from the water sample submitted on Sep. 24, 2025, was not satisfactory. HPC: 750 CFU/mL
  3. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water report from the water sample submitted on Sep. 24, 2025, was not satisfactory. HPC: 750 CFU/mL
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water submitted on July 9 was reported as unsatisfactory. HPC: 210 CFU/mL
  4. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water submitted on July 9 was reported as unsatisfactory. HPC: 210 CFU/mL
  5. Demand Inspection

    0 infractions

  6. Demand Inspection

    4 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample submitted on April 14 was reported as unsatisfactory.HPC:120 CFU/mL.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample collected on May 20, 2025, was unsatisfactory. HPC 12000 CFU/mL.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample collected on May 26, 2025, was unsatisfactory. HPC 440 CFU/mL.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Unsatisfactory water result from the sample collected on June 2, 2025. HPC 550 CFU/mL.
  7. Demand Inspection

    4 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Unsatisfactory water result from the sample collected on June 2, 2025. HPC 550 CFU/mL.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample submitted on April 14 was reported as unsatisfactory.HPC:120 CFU/mL.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample collected on May 20, 2025, was unsatisfactory. HPC 12000 CFU/mL.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample collected on May 26, 2025, was unsatisfactory. HPC 440 CFU/mL.
  8. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample submitted on April 14 was reported as unsatisfactory.HPC:120 CFU/mL.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample collected on May 20, 2025, was unsatisfactory. HPC 12000 CFU/mL.
  9. Demand Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample submitted on April 14 was reported as unsatisfactory.HPC:120 CFU/mL.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample collected on May 20, 2025, was unsatisfactory. HPC 12000 CFU/mL.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample collected on May 26, 2025, was unsatisfactory. HPC 440 CFU/mL.
  10. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample submitted on April 14 was reported as unsatisfactory.HPC:120 CFU/mL.
  11. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  12. Demand Inspection

    4 infractions

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • 1. Sample collected on December 31, 2024 was present for pseudomonas.
    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Unsatisfactory water result was received from the sample collected on Feb.26.Pseudomonas aeruginosa: ISOLATED
    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Unsatisfactory water result received from the Lab. Water sample submitted on March 31 was reported with Pseudomonas ISOLATED.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Unsatisfactory water result received from the Lab. Water sample submitted on March 31 was reported with HPC >57,000 CFU/mL.
  13. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • 1. Sample collected on December 31, 2024 was present for pseudomonas.
    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Unsatisfactory water result was received from the sample collected on Feb.26.Pseudomonas aeruginosa: ISOLATED
  14. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • 1. Sample collected on December 31, 2024 was present for pseudomonas.
  15. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Water sample submitted September 24, 2024 came back with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Spoke with Dwayne (sampler) on the phone and informed him of results. Instructed to treat and re-sample
  16. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  17. Demand Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Water sample submitted on June 18 was unsatisfactory.Pseudomonas was ISOLATED.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample submitted on June 11 was unsatisfactory. HPC was 190 CFU/mL.
    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Total Alkalinity was measured 12mg.
  18. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Water sample submitted on June 18 was unsatisfactory.Pseudomonas was ISOLATED.
  19. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample submitted on June 6 was unsatisfactory. HPC was detected. HPC 190 CFU/mL
  20. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website