Skip to content
Loading map…

Cottage Club Ghost Lake - Whirlpool

501 CottageClub Drive Rocky View County AB T4C 1B1 · Aquatic Facility

22 inspections

  1. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  2. Demand Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Water sample submitted on Nov. 27 was unsatisfactory. Pseudomonas was ISOLATED.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water submitted on July 9 was reported as unsatisfactory. HPC: 210 CFU/mL
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water report from the water sample submitted on Sep. 24, 2025, was not satisfactory. HPC: 750 CFU/mL
  3. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water report from the water sample submitted on Sep. 24, 2025, was not satisfactory. HPC: 750 CFU/mL
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water submitted on July 9 was reported as unsatisfactory. HPC: 210 CFU/mL
  4. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water submitted on July 9 was reported as unsatisfactory. HPC: 210 CFU/mL
  5. Demand Inspection

    0 infractions

  6. Demand Inspection

    4 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample submitted on April 14 was reported as unsatisfactory.HPC:120 CFU/mL.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample collected on May 20, 2025, was unsatisfactory. HPC 12000 CFU/mL.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample collected on May 26, 2025, was unsatisfactory. HPC 440 CFU/mL.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Unsatisfactory water result from the sample collected on June 2, 2025. HPC 550 CFU/mL.
  7. Demand Inspection

    4 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Unsatisfactory water result from the sample collected on June 2, 2025. HPC 550 CFU/mL.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample submitted on April 14 was reported as unsatisfactory.HPC:120 CFU/mL.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample collected on May 20, 2025, was unsatisfactory. HPC 12000 CFU/mL.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample collected on May 26, 2025, was unsatisfactory. HPC 440 CFU/mL.
  8. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample submitted on April 14 was reported as unsatisfactory.HPC:120 CFU/mL.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample collected on May 20, 2025, was unsatisfactory. HPC 12000 CFU/mL.
  9. Demand Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample submitted on April 14 was reported as unsatisfactory.HPC:120 CFU/mL.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample collected on May 20, 2025, was unsatisfactory. HPC 12000 CFU/mL.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample collected on May 26, 2025, was unsatisfactory. HPC 440 CFU/mL.
  10. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample submitted on April 14 was reported as unsatisfactory.HPC:120 CFU/mL.
  11. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  12. Demand Inspection

    4 infractions

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • 1. Sample collected on December 31, 2024 was present for pseudomonas.
    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Unsatisfactory water result was received from the sample collected on Feb.26.Pseudomonas aeruginosa: ISOLATED
    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Unsatisfactory water result received from the Lab. Water sample submitted on March 31 was reported with Pseudomonas ISOLATED.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Unsatisfactory water result received from the Lab. Water sample submitted on March 31 was reported with HPC >57,000 CFU/mL.
  13. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • 1. Sample collected on December 31, 2024 was present for pseudomonas.
    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Unsatisfactory water result was received from the sample collected on Feb.26.Pseudomonas aeruginosa: ISOLATED
  14. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • 1. Sample collected on December 31, 2024 was present for pseudomonas.
  15. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Water sample submitted September 24, 2024 came back with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Spoke with Dwayne (sampler) on the phone and informed him of results. Instructed to treat and re-sample
  16. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  17. Demand Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Water sample submitted on June 18 was unsatisfactory.Pseudomonas was ISOLATED.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample submitted on June 11 was unsatisfactory. HPC was 190 CFU/mL.
    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Total Alkalinity was measured 12mg.
  18. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Water sample submitted on June 18 was unsatisfactory.Pseudomonas was ISOLATED.
  19. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample submitted on June 6 was unsatisfactory. HPC was detected. HPC 190 CFU/mL
  20. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  21. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 14. Is the pool maintained in a clean and sanitary condition, good repair and are temperatures being properly regulated?
      • 1. Repairs to patches noted in basin have worn off. **Repairs are already scheduled for September**
  22. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Water sample collected on September 20 came back present for Pseudomonas and HPC count of 57000 CFU/mL.
    • 14. Is the pool maintained in a clean and sanitary condition, good repair and are temperatures being properly regulated?
      • 1. Repairs to patches noted in basin have worn off. **Repairs are already scheduled for September**