Skip to content
Loading map…

D'Beautiful-U

2351 159 Street SW Edmonton AB T6W 5K5 · Personal Services

Official record from Alberta →

Inspection summary

D'Beautiful-U has been inspected 2 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since July 28, 2026. The most recent inspection, on July 31, 2026, recorded 10 infractions.

None of the 2 inspections on record were free of infractions. In the past 12 months there were 2 inspections with 23 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Hand hygiene and infection control.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for clients. In personal service settings like salons, spas and tattoo studios, higher-risk findings are the ones that could spread infection from one client to the next, through broken skin, blood or instruments that were not properly cleaned and sterilized.

  • Hand hygiene and infection controlHigher risk

    Infection control is the core of a personal service inspection. Inspectors check that operators clean their hands and change gloves between clients, that a stocked hand sink is available, and that anything that breaks the skin is handled so blood-borne infections such as hepatitis B, hepatitis C and HIV cannot pass from one client to the next.

    Recorded once on July 28, 2026. For example: Is hand hygiene performed by the personal services worker when required, in a proper manner and are provisions available to perform hand hygiene?

  • Equipment and utensilsLower risk

    Instruments, chairs, tables and footbaths must be made of materials that can be cleaned, kept in good repair and stored so they stay clean. Single-use items such as nail files, buffers, razors and needles must be thrown away after each client.

    Recorded 12 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on July 31, 2026. For example: Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?

  • Permits, records and postingLower risk

    Operating permits, client records, sterilization logs and required signage. Client records matter because they let health officials contact people if an infection is linked to the business.

    Recorded 5 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on July 31, 2026. For example: Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?

  • Food safety training and certificationLower risk

    Some jurisdictions require operators to complete infection-prevention training, or to hold specific qualifications for higher-risk services such as tattooing, piercing or electrolysis. These findings mean the training record was missing at the time. They do not by themselves mean a client was put at risk.

    Recorded once on July 28, 2026. For example: Has the operator notified the RHA of the existence of a personal service business, including contact and location information, as well as all personal services currently offered or new personal services that will be offered for facilities and/or special events?

  • Other findingsLower risk

    Findings that do not fit the categories above, such as follow-ups that confirm an earlier violation was corrected, or requirements specific to this type of facility.

    Recorded 4 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on July 31, 2026. For example: Are cosmetic products appropriate for their intended use and being handled properly?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

2 inspections

  1. Risk Management Inspection

    10 infractions

    • 03. Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?
      • No written procedures for skin cleansing prior to services, antiseptic use, and accidental cuts were available.
    • 10. Is cleansing and antisepsis of skin and mucous membrane performed in accordance to written procedures and are suitable products being used?
      • Unacceptable antiseptic product was used for skin preparation: no DIN or NPN was available.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • 1. Preempt HLD5 high-level disinfectant used for tools disinfection expired on February 12, 2026. Approved high-level disinfectant is required. Another Preempt HLD5 was available (expiry in October 2026) and will be used instead.2. No disinfectant was available for disinfection of head spa plumbing. Please obtain.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • No records of testing of high-level disinfectant were available, and no testing of disinfectant has been conducted as required.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • No test strips were available to test the concentration of high-level disinfectant. Obtain the appropriate strips.
    • 21. Is equipment that is intended to be sterile maintained sterile at the point of use?
      • Some needles (BB Glow, wart removal) and blades for microblading did not have proper sterility assurance documentation available: missing lot numbers and/or expiry dates. Ensure that all sterile tools used have proper sterility assurance documentation available.
    • 25. Are the equipment manufacturer's instructions for use of specific equipment available and followed?
      • The machine used for light treatment did not have manufacturer's instructions. Ensure that the manufacturer's instructions are available or discontinue use of the equipment.
    • 26. Are cosmetic products appropriate for their intended use and being handled properly?
      • Some cosmetic products did not have appropriate labels (unlabelled bottles, products with labels in languages other than English/French, no ingredients listed or no label (teeth whitening products)). Ensure that all cosmetic products have appropriate labels.
    • 30. Is the reprocessing area of a personal service facility that uses reusable equipment properly designed, managed and maintained to ensure the safety of clients?
      • The reprocessing area was located in the bathroom. Bathroom sink was used for tools washing. Provide a designated reprocessing sink, which is not located in the bathroom.
    • 33. Are general nuisance conditions, other than those noted in other violations, being prevented at this personal services facility (Non-Critical)?
      • Mirrors were present in the room used for laser services. Please remove or ensure that they are covered during the services.
  2. Initial Inspection

    13 infractions

    • 02. Has the operator notified the RHA of the existence of a personal service business, including contact and location information, as well as all personal services currently offered or new personal services that will be offered for facilities and/or special events?
      • The owner of the personal service business did not submit a notification about the business to the Alberta Health Services. Submitted during the inspection.
    • 03. Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?
      • No written procedures for skin cleansing prior to services, antiseptic use, and accidental cuts were available.
    • 08. Is hand hygiene performed by the personal services worker when required, in a proper manner and are provisions available to perform hand hygiene?
      • Hand sanitizer used did not have a proper label: no ingredients listed, no direction for use and warnings, or expiry date was available. Ensure that hand sanitizers used have NPN/DIN, alcohol content between 60 and 90%, and are not expired.
    • 10. Is cleansing and antisepsis of skin and mucous membrane performed in accordance to written procedures and are suitable products being used?
      • Unacceptable antiseptic product was used for skin preparation: no DIN or NPN was available.
    • 12. Are personal services workers at the facility maintaining client records and where applicable, sterility documentation corresponding to that client?
      • Sterility assurance documentation for sterile equipment was not retained with the clients' records. Ensure that sterility assurance documentation for all critical equipment used during services is retained with clients' forms. Discussed.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • 1. Preempt HLD5 high-level disinfectant used for tools disinfection expired on February 12, 2026. Approved high-level disinfectant is required. Another Preempt HLD5 was available (expiry in October 2026) and will be used instead.2. No disinfectant was available for disinfection of head spa plumbing. Please obtain.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • No records of testing of high-level disinfectant were available, and no testing of disinfectant has been conducted as required.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • No test strips were available to test the concentration of high-level disinfectant. Obtain the appropriate strips.
    • 21. Is equipment that is intended to be sterile maintained sterile at the point of use?
      • Some needles (BB Glow, wart removal) and blades for microblading did not have proper sterility assurance documentation available: missing lot numbers and/or expiry dates. Ensure that all sterile tools used have proper sterility assurance documentation available.
    • 25. Are the equipment manufacturer's instructions for use of specific equipment available and followed?
      • The machine used for light treatment did not have manufacturer's instructions. Ensure that the manufacturer's instructions are available or discontinue use of the equipment.
    • 26. Are cosmetic products appropriate for their intended use and being handled properly?
      • Some cosmetic products did not have appropriate labels (unlabelled bottles, products with labels in languages other than English/French, no ingredients listed or no label (teeth whitening products)). Ensure that all cosmetic products have appropriate labels.
    • 30. Is the reprocessing area of a personal service facility that uses reusable equipment properly designed, managed and maintained to ensure the safety of clients?
      • The reprocessing area was located in the bathroom. Bathroom sink was used for tools washing. Provide a designated reprocessing sink, which is not located in the bathroom.
    • 33. Are general nuisance conditions, other than those noted in other violations, being prevented at this personal services facility (Non-Critical)?
      • Mirrors were present in the room used for laser services. Please remove or ensure that they are covered during the services.
Own this business? Add a badge to your website