Skip to content
Loading map…

Derrick Golf & Winter Club - Men's Whirlpool

3500 119 Street NW Edmonton AB T6J 5P5 · Aquatic Facility

Official record from Alberta →

Inspection summary

Derrick Golf & Winter Club - Men's Whirlpool has been inspected 15 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since October 26, 2023. The most recent inspection, on July 13, 2026, found no infractions.

2 of 15 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 9 inspections with 13 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Pool and spa water quality and Chemicals and toxic substances.

The number of infractions per inspection has stayed roughly the same over time.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for the people using the facility. Higher-risk findings are the ones that could directly cause illness or injury, such as water that is not properly treated.

  • Pool and spa water qualityHigher risk

    For pools, spas and splash pads, inspectors test disinfectant levels, pH and water clarity, and check safety equipment. Water that is not properly treated can spread skin, ear and stomach infections.

    Recorded 22 times across 13 separate inspections, most recently on July 6, 2026. For example: Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?

  • Chemicals and toxic substancesHigher risk

    Pool chemicals such as chlorine and acid must be labelled, stored apart from each other and handled safely. Mixing them by mistake can release toxic gas, so storage and handling problems are treated seriously.

    Recorded 3 times across 3 separate inspections, most recently on February 5, 2026. For example: Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

15 inspections

  1. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  2. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • the sample 26EN-184E00087 submitted on July 2, 2026, was unsatisfactory: Total coliforms were present.
  3. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  4. Risk Management Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Combined chlorine residual was 2.12 ppm. Please ensure that the combined chlorine residual is maintained at the lowest level possible, and below 1 ppm.
    • 12. Are the general safety devices and physical conditions in this pool providing a safe environment (Critical)?
      • According to the new Anti-Entrapment Compliance Plan, new covers Aquastar 914101 have maximum flow rate allowed 250 gpm but total flow rate that can be produced by the system is 308 gpm (as per new Anti-Entrapment Compliance Plan). At the time of the inspection, the recirculation pump flow rate was about 85 gpm, but the jet pump flow meter could not be read- sand in the flow meter (unable to confirm the jet pump flow rate). Ensure that the flow rate for the system does not exceed the maximum allowed flow rate for the main drain covers. Updated on December 16, 2025:* Jet pump flow rate could not be confirmed: flow meter was not operational. Therefore, it could not be confirmed if total maximum flow rate was under 250 gpm (maximum allowed flow rate for the drain covers).
  5. Demand Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • the sample 26EN-022E00673 submitted on January 22, 2026, was unsatisfactory: Pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated.
    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Combined chlorine residual was 2.12 ppm. Please ensure that the combined chlorine residual is maintained at the lowest level possible, and below 1 ppm.
    • 12. Are the general safety devices and physical conditions in this pool providing a safe environment (Critical)?
      • According to the new Anti-Entrapment Compliance Plan, new covers Aquastar 914101 have maximum flow rate allowed 250 gpm but total flow rate that can be produced by the system is 308 gpm (as per new Anti-Entrapment Compliance Plan). At the time of the inspection, the recirculation pump flow rate was about 85 gpm, but the jet pump flow meter could not be read- sand in the flow meter (unable to confirm the jet pump flow rate). Ensure that the flow rate for the system does not exceed the maximum allowed flow rate for the main drain covers. Updated on December 16, 2025:* Jet pump flow rate could not be confirmed: flow meter was not operational. Therefore, it could not be confirmed if total maximum flow rate was under 250 gpm (maximum allowed flow rate for the drain covers).
  6. Monitoring Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Combined chlorine residual was 2.12 ppm. Please ensure that the combined chlorine residual is maintained at the lowest level possible, and below 1 ppm.
    • 12. Are the general safety devices and physical conditions in this pool providing a safe environment (Critical)?
      • According to the new Anti-Entrapment Compliance Plan, new covers Aquastar 914101 have maximum flow rate allowed 250 gpm but total flow rate that can be produced by the system is 308 gpm (as per new Anti-Entrapment Compliance Plan). At the time of the inspection, the recirculation pump flow rate was about 85 gpm, but the jet pump flow meter could not be read- sand in the flow meter (unable to confirm the jet pump flow rate). Ensure that the flow rate for the system does not exceed the maximum allowed flow rate for the main drain covers. Updated on December 16, 2025:* Jet pump flow rate could not be confirmed: flow meter was not operational. Therefore, it could not be confirmed if total maximum flow rate was under 250 gpm (maximum allowed flow rate for the drain covers).
  7. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • the sample 25EN-331E00768 submitted on November 27, 2025, was unsatisfactory: Pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated.
    • 12. Are the general safety devices and physical conditions in this pool providing a safe environment (Critical)?
      • According to the new Anti-Entrapment Compliance Plan, new covers Aquastar 914101 have maximum flow rate allowed 250 gpm but total flow rate that can be produced by the system is 308 gpm (as per new Anti-Entrapment Compliance Plan). At the time of the inspection, the recirculation pump flow rate was about 85 gpm, but the jet pump flow meter could not be read- sand in the flow meter (unable to confirm the jet pump flow rate). Ensure that the flow rate for the system does not exceed the maximum allowed flow rate for the main drain covers.
  8. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 12. Are the general safety devices and physical conditions in this pool providing a safe environment (Critical)?
      • According to the new Anti-Entrapment Compliance Plan, new covers Aquastar 914101 have maximum flow rate allowed 250 gpm but total flow rate that can be produced by the system is 308 gpm (as per new Anti-Entrapment Compliance Plan). At the time of the inspection, the recirculation pump flow rate was about 85 gpm, but the jet pump flow meter could not be read- sand in the flow meter (unable to confirm the jet pump flow rate). Ensure that the flow rate for the system does not exceed the maximum allowed flow rate for the main drain covers.
  9. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • the sample 25EN-318E00142 submitted on November 14, 2025, was unsatisfactory: Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated.
    • 12. Are the general safety devices and physical conditions in this pool providing a safe environment (Critical)?
      • According to the new Anti-Entrapment Compliance Plan, new covers Aquastar 914101 have maximum flow rate allowed 250 gpm but total flow rate that can be produced by the system is 308 gpm (as per new Anti-Entrapment Compliance Plan). At the time of the inspection, the recirculation pump flow rate was about 85 gpm, but the jet pump flow meter could not be read- sand in the flow meter (unable to confirm the jet pump flow rate). Ensure that the flow rate for the system does not exceed the maximum allowed flow rate for the main drain covers.
  10. Monitoring Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 12. Are the general safety devices and physical conditions in this pool providing a safe environment (Critical)?
      • According to the new Anti-Entrapment Compliance Plan, new covers Aquastar 914101 have maximum flow rate allowed 250 gpm but total flow rate that can be produced by the system is 308 gpm (as per new Anti-Entrapment Compliance Plan). At the time of the inspection, the recirculation pump flow rate was about 85 gpm, but the jet pump flow meter could not be read- sand in the flow meter (unable to confirm the jet pump flow rate). Ensure that the flow rate for the system does not exceed the maximum allowed flow rate for the main drain covers.
  11. Demand Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • the sample 24EN-201E00071 submitted on July 19, 2024, was unsatisfactory: HPC 180.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • the sample 24EN-166E00134 submitted on June 14, 2024, was unsatisfactory: HPC 120.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Rate of filtration for the filtration system was 15.26 gpm/sq ft based on a flow rate 110 gpm and a filtration area of 7.155 sq ft. According to the filter data plate, the maximum flow rate allowed by the manufacturer is 100.8 gpm for commercial application, while the observed flow rate was 110 gpm. Therefore, the flow rate cannot exceed 100 gpm (which will result in the rate of filtration 13.97 gpm/ft2), if the chemical and microbiological parameters can be maintained, or the flow rate must be lowered to 90 gpm to provide the rate of filtration 12.5 gpm/ft2.
  12. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • the sample 24EN-166E00134 submitted on June 14, 2024, was unsatisfactory: HPC 120.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Rate of filtration for the filtration system was 15.26 gpm/sq ft based on a flow rate 110 gpm and a filtration area of 7.155 sq ft. According to the filter data plate, the maximum flow rate allowed by the manufacturer is 100.8 gpm for commercial application, while the observed flow rate was 110 gpm. Therefore, the flow rate cannot exceed 100 gpm (which will result in the rate of filtration 13.97 gpm/ft2), if the chemical and microbiological parameters can be maintained, or the flow rate must be lowered to 90 gpm to provide the rate of filtration 12.5 gpm/ft2.
  13. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Rate of filtration for the filtration system was 15.26 gpm/sq ft based on a flow rate 110 gpm and a filtration area of 7.155 sq ft. According to the filter data plate, the maximum flow rate allowed by the manufacturer is 100.8 gpm for commercial application, while the observed flow rate was 110 gpm. Therefore, the flow rate cannot exceed 100 gpm (which will result in the rate of filtration 13.97 gpm/ft2), if the chemical and microbiological parameters can be maintained, or the flow rate must be lowered to 90 gpm to provide the rate of filtration 12.5 gpm/ft2.
  14. Risk Management Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Flow rate for the whirlpool could not be determined because the flow meter was not operational: turnover period and rate of filtration could not be confirmed. Repair or replace the flow meter.
    • 10. Are general nuisance conditions, other than those noted in other violations, being prevented at this pool (Non-Critical)?
      • The skimmers had scum/mildew growth and required cleaning.
  15. Monitoring Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Flow rate for the whirlpool could not be determined because the flow meter was not operational: turnover period and rate of filtration could not be confirmed. Repair or replace the flow meter.
    • 10. Are general nuisance conditions, other than those noted in other violations, being prevented at this pool (Non-Critical)?
      • The skimmers had scum/mildew growth and required cleaning.
    • 12. Are the general safety devices and physical conditions in this pool providing a safe environment (Critical)?
      • Invalid installation of the inner adapter frame for the main drain outlets.
Own this business? Add a badge to your website