Skip to content
Loading map…

J Eyebrow & Lip

1011 Daniels Loop SW Edmonton AB T6W 4C9 · Personal Services

Official record from Alberta →

Inspection summary

J Eyebrow & Lip has been inspected 2 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since July 9, 2025. The most recent inspection, on July 18, 2025, found no infractions.

1 of 2 inspections on record found no infractions at all. No inspections are on record from the past 12 months. All recorded findings relate to upkeep, equipment or paperwork rather than direct infection-control risks to clients.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for clients. In personal service settings like salons, spas and tattoo studios, higher-risk findings are the ones that could spread infection from one client to the next, through broken skin, blood or instruments that were not properly cleaned and sterilized.

  • Equipment and utensilsLower risk

    Instruments, chairs, tables and footbaths must be made of materials that can be cleaned, kept in good repair and stored so they stay clean. Single-use items such as nail files, buffers, razors and needles must be thrown away after each client.

    Recorded 7 times on July 9, 2025. For example: Is single-use or uncleanable equipment being used as intended (Non-Critical)?

  • Permits, records and postingLower risk

    Operating permits, client records, sterilization logs and required signage. Client records matter because they let health officials contact people if an infection is linked to the business.

    Recorded 3 times on July 9, 2025. For example: Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?

  • Other findingsLower risk

    Findings that do not fit the categories above, such as follow-ups that confirm an earlier violation was corrected, or requirements specific to this type of facility.

    Recorded 2 times on July 9, 2025. For example: Are cosmetic products appropriate for their intended use and being handled properly?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

2 inspections

  1. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  2. Monitoring Inspection

    12 infractions

    • 03. Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?
      • No written procedures for skin cleansing prior to services and antiseptic use were available.
    • 10. Is cleansing and antisepsis of skin and mucous membrane performed in accordance to written procedures and are suitable products being used?
      • An antiseptic product was not being used to clean the client's skin prior to treatment. Ensure the client's skin is cleaned with a product labeled as an antiseptic prior to microblading/semi-permanent makeup services. Updated on July 9, 2025:1. Unacceptable antiseptic product was used for skin preparation: no DIN or NPN was available.
    • 12. Are personal services workers at the facility maintaining client records and where applicable, sterility documentation corresponding to that client?
      • Record keeping regarding which sterilized equipment was being used on which client (and on which day) was not being maintained. Ensure tracking information for each needle used is attached to the client form (so it is clear which client, had which needle, and on which day). Updated on July 9, 2025;1. Sterility assurance documentation for sterile equipment was not retained with the clients' records. Ensure that sterility assurance documentation for all critical equipment used during services is retained with clients' forms.
    • 14. Is single-use or uncleanable equipment being used as intended (Non-Critical)?
      • No product for cleaning make-up brushes between the clients was available.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • No approved disinfectant was used for permanent make-up machine disinfection (alcohol was used). Obtain a proper disinfectant.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • No soaking tray was available for disinfection of the tweezers. The semi-critical tools must be disinfected by soaking in a high-level disinfectant.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • No records of testing of high-level disinfectant were available, and no testing of disinfectant has been conducted as required.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • No test strips were available to test the concentration of high-level disinfectant. Obtain the appropriate strips.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • No approved disinfectant has been used for tools disinfection. Approved high-level disinfectant is required.
    • 26. Are cosmetic products appropriate for their intended use and being handled properly?
      • Numbing cream expired in August 2024.
    • 26. Are cosmetic products appropriate for their intended use and being handled properly?
      • Some cosmetic products did not have appropriate labels: Cleansing Water and Keratin Booster labels were in Korean only. Ensure that all cosmetic products have appropriate labels.
    • 30. Is the reprocessing area of a personal service facility that uses reusable equipment properly designed, managed and maintained to ensure the safety of clients?
      • The reprocessing area was located in the bathroom. Bathroom sink was used for tools washing. Provide a designated reprocessing sink, which is not located in the bathroom.
Own this business? Add a badge to your website