Skip to content
Loading map…

Nexsource Centre - Hot Tub

4823 49 Avenue Sylvan Lake AB T4S 1M6 · Aquatic Facility

Official record from Alberta →

Inspection summary

Nexsource Centre - Hot Tub has been inspected 14 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since November 21, 2023. The most recent inspection, on April 8, 2026, recorded 2 infractions.

5 of 14 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 2 inspections with 2 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Chemicals and toxic substances and Pool and spa water quality.

The number of infractions per inspection has stayed roughly the same over time.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for the people using the facility. Higher-risk findings are the ones that could directly cause illness or injury, such as water that is not properly treated.

  • Chemicals and toxic substancesHigher risk

    Pool chemicals such as chlorine and acid must be labelled, stored apart from each other and handled safely. Mixing them by mistake can release toxic gas, so storage and handling problems are treated seriously.

    Recorded 7 times across 5 separate inspections, most recently on April 8, 2026. For example: Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?

  • Pool and spa water qualityHigher risk

    For pools, spas and splash pads, inspectors test disinfectant levels, pH and water clarity, and check safety equipment. Water that is not properly treated can spread skin, ear and stomach infections.

    Recorded 4 times across 4 separate inspections, most recently on October 3, 2025. For example: Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

14 inspections

  1. Monitoring Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • FAC was at .72 and ORP was fluctuating in the 600 range in a review of the records. Chemistry was adjusted and chlorine reached 4.72 ppm.
    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Total alkalinity was found to be 43 ppm when tested. Adjustments were made and the alkalinity was increased to 86 ppm.
  2. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  3. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  4. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Results from sample collected Oct. 1 showed the presence of total coliforms.
  5. Monitoring Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • TA was at 52 ppm. Staff added water to pool and TA climbed to 63 ppm.
  6. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  7. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • HPC of 380 in sample collected Nov. 19.
  8. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  9. Monitoring Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • FAC was below 2 ppm and ORP was not consistently above 700 according to records. FAC was increased during inspection.pH 6.9
    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Combined chlorine levels were averaging double the FAC. Operator will adjust.
  10. Monitoring Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • pH was high at 8.54 during inspection staff adjusted the pH and final result was 7.52
  11. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • HPC was 170 CFU/mL in sample collected Mar. 12.
  12. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  13. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Sample collected Nov. 28 had an HPC level of 120CFU/mL
  14. Monitoring Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • - Free available chlorine: 1.51-1.56 ppm (corrected by operator and retest yielded result of 2.9 ppm)- pH: 7.1
Own this business? Add a badge to your website