Rockland Park HOA - Whirlpool
90 Rowley Way NW Calgary AB T3L 0G4 · Aquatic Facility
Inspection summary
Rockland Park HOA - Whirlpool has been inspected 27 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since November 15, 2024. The most recent inspection, on October 5, 2026, found no infractions.
5 of 27 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 19 inspections with 39 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Pool and spa water quality.
Recent inspections have recorded more infractions than earlier ones, so it is worth reading the latest reports closely.
What these findings mean
Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for the people using the facility. Higher-risk findings are the ones that could directly cause illness or injury, such as water that is not properly treated.
Pool and spa water qualityHigher risk
For pools, spas and splash pads, inspectors test disinfectant levels, pH and water clarity, and check safety equipment. Water that is not properly treated can spread skin, ear and stomach infections.
Recorded 39 times across 22 separate inspections, most recently on September 28, 2026. For example:
Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
Permits, records and postingLower risk
Operating permits, water-test logs, posted bather rules and emergency procedures. Daily test logs are how operators show the water was checked and treated between inspections.
Recorded 7 times across 7 separate inspections, most recently on August 17, 2026. For example:
Are proper testing, monitoring, and other records being properly maintained?
About this data
These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.
27 inspections
- Risk Management Inspection
0 infractions
- Demand Inspection
1 infraction
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Water sample (26ES-268E00092) collected on September 24, 2026, came back unsatisfactory as pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated in the sample.Please treat the water as per the pseudomonas information sheet, rebalance the water chemistry and resample.
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Risk Management Inspection
0 infractions
- Demand Inspection
3 infractions
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Water sample (26ES-232E00189) collected on Aug 20th, 2026, came back unsatisfactory as pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated in the sample.Please treat, rebalance, and resample.
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Water sample collected on August 06 2026, tested positive for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Treat and resample.
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Water sample taken Aug 13 - Pseudomonas isolated.-Maintain basin water so that Pseudomonas is not present-Treat the whirlpool to eliminate any possible sources of contamination, drain, scrub, rinse, and refill. Chemically balance the whirlpool. Submit a bacteriological sample to the Provincial laboratory. A satisfactory water sample result must be received
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Demand Inspection
2 infractions
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Water sample collected on August 06 2026, tested positive for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Treat and resample.
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Water sample taken Aug 13 - Pseudomonas isolated.-Maintain basin water so that Pseudomonas is not present-Treat the whirlpool to eliminate any possible sources of contamination, drain, scrub, rinse, and refill. Chemically balance the whirlpool. Submit a bacteriological sample to the Provincial laboratory. A satisfactory water sample result must be received
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Demand Inspection
4 infractions
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Water sample collected on August 06 2026, tested positive for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Treat and resample.
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Water sample taken Aug 13 - Pseudomonas isolated.-Maintain basin water so that Pseudomonas is not present-Treat the whirlpool to eliminate any possible sources of contamination, drain, scrub, rinse, and refill. Chemically balance the whirlpool. Submit a bacteriological sample to the Provincial laboratory. A satisfactory water sample result must be received
- 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
- The operator is relying on frequent manual chlorine addition rather than properly utilizing the automated dosing system, resulting in inconsistent disinfectant levels that do not reliably meet required levels. Automated systems are designed to provide consistent and controlled chemical dosing, and improper reliance on manual addition undermines system effectiveness and regulatory compliance. Discontinue routine manual chlorine addition, except when necessary for specific situations like superchlorination.**Ensure the automated dosing system is fully operational and properly calibrated to maintain required disinfectant levels
- 16. Are proper testing, monitoring, and other records being properly maintained?
- Record keeping for the hot tub is incomplete and inconsistent. Several entries are missing dates on the page, and multiple instances showing zero FAC entries with no corrective action taken. Accurate and complete records are essential to demonstrate that the pool is being properly monitored and maintained.**Maintain complete, accurate, and legible records, including date and any corrective actions taken when tests fall outside acceptable limits.
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Demand Inspection
3 infractions
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Water sample collected on August 06 2026, tested positive for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Treat and resample.
- 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
- The operator is relying on frequent manual chlorine addition rather than properly utilizing the automated dosing system, resulting in inconsistent disinfectant levels that do not reliably meet required levels. Automated systems are designed to provide consistent and controlled chemical dosing, and improper reliance on manual addition undermines system effectiveness and regulatory compliance. Discontinue routine manual chlorine addition, except when necessary for specific situations like superchlorination.**Ensure the automated dosing system is fully operational and properly calibrated to maintain required disinfectant levels
- 16. Are proper testing, monitoring, and other records being properly maintained?
- Record keeping for the hot tub is incomplete and inconsistent. Several entries are missing dates on the page, and multiple instances showing zero FAC entries with no corrective action taken. Accurate and complete records are essential to demonstrate that the pool is being properly monitored and maintained.**Maintain complete, accurate, and legible records, including date and any corrective actions taken when tests fall outside acceptable limits.
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Risk Management Inspection
2 infractions
- 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
- The operator is relying on frequent manual chlorine addition rather than properly utilizing the automated dosing system, resulting in inconsistent disinfectant levels that do not reliably meet required levels. Automated systems are designed to provide consistent and controlled chemical dosing, and improper reliance on manual addition undermines system effectiveness and regulatory compliance. Discontinue routine manual chlorine addition, except when necessary for specific situations like superchlorination.**Ensure the automated dosing system is fully operational and properly calibrated to maintain required disinfectant levels
- 16. Are proper testing, monitoring, and other records being properly maintained?
- Record keeping for the hot tub is incomplete and inconsistent. Several entries are missing dates on the page, and multiple instances showing zero FAC entries with no corrective action taken. Accurate and complete records are essential to demonstrate that the pool is being properly monitored and maintained.**Maintain complete, accurate, and legible records, including date and any corrective actions taken when tests fall outside acceptable limits.
- 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
- Demand Inspection
3 infractions
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Water sample collected June 11, 2026 positive for Pseudomonas
- 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
- The operator is relying on frequent manual chlorine addition rather than properly utilizing the automated dosing system, resulting in inconsistent disinfectant levels that do not reliably meet required levels. Automated systems are designed to provide consistent and controlled chemical dosing, and improper reliance on manual addition undermines system effectiveness and regulatory compliance. Discontinue routine manual chlorine addition, except when necessary for specific situations like superchlorination.**Ensure the automated dosing system is fully operational and properly calibrated to maintain required disinfectant levels
- 16. Are proper testing, monitoring, and other records being properly maintained?
- Record keeping for the hot tub is incomplete and inconsistent. Several entries are missing dates on the page, and multiple instances showing zero FAC entries with no corrective action taken. Accurate and complete records are essential to demonstrate that the pool is being properly monitored and maintained.**Maintain complete, accurate, and legible records, including date and any corrective actions taken when tests fall outside acceptable limits.
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Risk Management Inspection
2 infractions
- 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
- The operator is relying on frequent manual chlorine addition rather than properly utilizing the automated dosing system, resulting in inconsistent disinfectant levels that do not reliably meet required levels. Automated systems are designed to provide consistent and controlled chemical dosing, and improper reliance on manual addition undermines system effectiveness and regulatory compliance. Discontinue routine manual chlorine addition, except when necessary for specific situations like superchlorination.**Ensure the automated dosing system is fully operational and properly calibrated to maintain required disinfectant levels
- 16. Are proper testing, monitoring, and other records being properly maintained?
- Record keeping for the hot tub is incomplete and inconsistent. Several entries are missing dates on the page, and multiple instances showing zero FAC entries with no corrective action taken. Accurate and complete records are essential to demonstrate that the pool is being properly monitored and maintained.**Maintain complete, accurate, and legible records, including date and any corrective actions taken when tests fall outside acceptable limits.
- 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
- Demand Inspection
3 infractions
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Water sample collected on 14/05/2026, tested positive for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Treat and resample.
- 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
- The operator is relying on frequent manual chlorine addition rather than properly utilizing the automated dosing system, resulting in inconsistent disinfectant levels that do not reliably meet required levels. Automated systems are designed to provide consistent and controlled chemical dosing, and improper reliance on manual addition undermines system effectiveness and regulatory compliance. Discontinue routine manual chlorine addition, except when necessary for specific situations like superchlorination.**Ensure the automated dosing system is fully operational and properly calibrated to maintain required disinfectant levels
- 16. Are proper testing, monitoring, and other records being properly maintained?
- Record keeping for the hot tub is incomplete and inconsistent. Several entries are missing dates on the page, and multiple instances showing zero FAC entries with no corrective action taken. Accurate and complete records are essential to demonstrate that the pool is being properly monitored and maintained.**Maintain complete, accurate, and legible records, including date and any corrective actions taken when tests fall outside acceptable limits.
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Monitoring Inspection
4 infractions
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Water sample collected on 1/05/2026, tested positive for Pseudomonas aeruginosa Treat and resample.
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Water sample 1/05/2026, had a HPC of 210 CFU/mlTreat and resample.
- 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
- The operator is relying on frequent manual chlorine addition rather than properly utilizing the automated dosing system, resulting in inconsistent disinfectant levels that do not reliably meet required levels. Automated systems are designed to provide consistent and controlled chemical dosing, and improper reliance on manual addition undermines system effectiveness and regulatory compliance. Discontinue routine manual chlorine addition, except when necessary for specific situations like superchlorination.**Ensure the automated dosing system is fully operational and properly calibrated to maintain required disinfectant levels
- 16. Are proper testing, monitoring, and other records being properly maintained?
- Record keeping for the hot tub is incomplete and inconsistent. Several entries are missing dates on the page, and multiple instances showing zero FAC entries with no corrective action taken. Accurate and complete records are essential to demonstrate that the pool is being properly monitored and maintained.**Maintain complete, accurate, and legible records, including date and any corrective actions taken when tests fall outside acceptable limits.
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Demand Inspection
2 infractions
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Water sample collected on 1/05/2026, tested positive for Pseudomonas aeruginosa Treat and resample.
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Water sample 1/05/2026, had a HPC of 210 CFU/mlTreat and resample.
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Demand Inspection
2 infractions
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Water sample collected on 10/03/2026, tested positive for Pseudomonas aeruginosa Treat and resample.
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Water sample 10/03/2026, had a HPC of 110 CFU/mlTreat and resample.
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Demand Inspection
2 infractions
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Water sample collected on January 30, 2026 was positive for Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated. - Treat the whirlpool water, clean the basin and submit a resample.Discussed with the pool operator Andrew B.
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Collection date: December 23, 2025Collection time: 08:00 amCollected by: Andrew BrownResults: HPC count 1050 CFU/ml- Treat and resample.
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Demand Inspection
2 infractions
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Collection date: December 23, 2025Collection time: 08:00 amCollected by: Andrew BrownResults: Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated- Treat and resample.
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Collection date: December 23, 2025Collection time: 08:00 amCollected by: Andrew BrownResults: HPC count 1050 CFU/ml- Treat and resample.
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Demand Inspection
1 infraction
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Collection date: December 15, 2025Collection time: 08:00 amCollected by: Andrew BrownResults: HPC count 110 CFU/ml
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Demand Inspection
2 infractions
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Water sample result:Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated.Sample collected by Andrew B.Date of collection December 03, 2025.- Treat and resample.
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Water sample submitted on December 10, was not processed due to no identification label from the requisition form on the bottle.- please re-sample.
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Demand Inspection
1 infraction
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Water sample result:Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated.Sample collected by Andrew B.Date of collection December 03, 2025.- Treat and resample.
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Risk Management Inspection
0 infractions
- Demand Inspection
1 infraction
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Repeat violation:Water sample collected on 16/09/2025 tested positive for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Treat and resample.Previous violation:Water sample result:Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated.Sample collected by Andrew B.Date of collection September 08, 2025.-Treat and resample.
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Demand Inspection
2 infractions
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Water sample result:Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated.Sample collected by Andrew B.Date of collection September 08, 2025.-Treat and resample.
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Water sample result:HPC count: 310CFU/mLSample collected by: Andrew B.Date of the sample collected: September 08, 2025.-Resample.
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Demand Inspection
2 infractions
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Water sample result:Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated.Sample collected by Andrew B.Date of collection August 20, 2025.-Treat and resample.
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Water sample result:HPC count: 150CFU/mLSample collected by: Andrew B.Date of the sample collected: 20 August 2025.-Resample.
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Demand Inspection
1 infraction
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Water sample result:HPC count: 150CFU/mLSample collected by: Andrew B.Date of the sample collected: 01 August 2025.-Resample.
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Demand Inspection
1 infraction
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Water sample result:HPC count: 800 CFU/mLSample collected by: Andrew Brown.Date of the sample collected: 18 July 2025.-Resample.
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Initial Inspection
0 infractions
- Demand Inspection
0 infractions