Scenic Grande Retirement Residence - Pool
8720 Scurfield Drive NW Calgary AB T3L 0G3 · Aquatic Facility
Inspection summary
Scenic Grande Retirement Residence - Pool has been inspected 10 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since March 27, 2024. The most recent inspection, on October 2, 2026, found no infractions.
6 of 10 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 3 inspections with 6 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Pool and spa water quality and Chemicals and toxic substances.
The number of infractions per inspection has stayed roughly the same over time.
What these findings mean
Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for the people using the facility. Higher-risk findings are the ones that could directly cause illness or injury, such as water that is not properly treated.
Pool and spa water qualityHigher risk
For pools, spas and splash pads, inspectors test disinfectant levels, pH and water clarity, and check safety equipment. Water that is not properly treated can spread skin, ear and stomach infections.
Recorded 5 times across 3 separate inspections, most recently on September 2, 2026. For example:
Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
Chemicals and toxic substancesHigher risk
Pool chemicals such as chlorine and acid must be labelled, stored apart from each other and handled safely. Mixing them by mistake can release toxic gas, so storage and handling problems are treated seriously.
Recorded 2 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on September 2, 2026. For example:
Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
Permits, records and postingLower risk
Operating permits, water-test logs, posted bather rules and emergency procedures. Daily test logs are how operators show the water was checked and treated between inspections.
Recorded once on September 2, 2026. For example:
Are proper testing, monitoring, and other records being properly maintained?
Food safety training and certificationLower risk
Many jurisdictions require trained pool operators and certified lifeguards. These findings mean required training, certification or staffing records were missing at the time of inspection.
Recorded once on September 2, 2026. For example:
Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
About this data
These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.
10 inspections
- Risk Management Inspection
0 infractions
- Demand Inspection
6 infractions
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Weekly sampling of the pool is required.
- 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Chlorine was at 0.5ppm, ensure that the chlorine level is maintained between 1-3ppm.
- 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
- Ensure that the automated controller has been calibrated.
- 15. Has an owner or owner's agent, if any, been identified and is the pool operated and maintained by a qualified pool operator?
- No one on staff is a certified pool operator; ensure that care and control of the pool is under the care of professional pool operator until there is certified pool operator on site. Provide supporting documentation.
- 16. Are proper testing, monitoring, and other records being properly maintained?
- There is no test kit on site. Ensure that pool is tested daily and results are recorded daily.
- 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
- Aniti-entrapment plan is missing information as the AHS pool specialist has mentioned via email; please update and submit an updated anti-entrapment plan with supporting documentation.
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Demand Inspection
0 infractions
- Demand Inspection
0 infractions
- Demand Inspection
0 infractions
- Demand Inspection
1 infraction
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Sample collected on July 15, 2025 revealed HPC >57,000 CFU/mL. Resample.
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Demand Inspection
0 infractions
- Demand Inspection
1 infraction
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Nov 19 sample - HPC 120 CFU/MLSpoke to John, treat and submit a resample.
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Monitoring Inspection
1 infraction
- 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- FAC measured 0.79ppm, the pool records recorded 1ppm from their test kit. The pool manager noted the lower FAC and adjusted it to increase the chlorine level to ensure it measures 1ppm or above.
- 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Monitoring Inspection
0 infractions