Skip to content
Loading map…

Super 8 Three Hills by Wyndham - Hot Tub

208 18 Avenue N Three Hills AB T0M 2A0 · Aquatic Facility

Official record from Alberta →

Inspection summary

Super 8 Three Hills by Wyndham - Hot Tub has been inspected 15 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since January 5, 2024. The most recent inspection, on September 29, 2026, recorded 1 infraction.

7 of 15 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 3 inspections with 5 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Pool and spa water quality and Chemicals and toxic substances.

The number of infractions per inspection has stayed roughly the same over time.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for the people using the facility. Higher-risk findings are the ones that could directly cause illness or injury, such as water that is not properly treated.

  • Pool and spa water qualityHigher risk

    For pools, spas and splash pads, inspectors test disinfectant levels, pH and water clarity, and check safety equipment. Water that is not properly treated can spread skin, ear and stomach infections.

    Recorded 6 times across 5 separate inspections, most recently on August 11, 2026. For example: Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?

  • Chemicals and toxic substancesHigher risk

    Pool chemicals such as chlorine and acid must be labelled, stored apart from each other and handled safely. Mixing them by mistake can release toxic gas, so storage and handling problems are treated seriously.

    Recorded 4 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on December 13, 2024. For example: Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?

  • Food safety training and certificationLower risk

    Many jurisdictions require trained pool operators and certified lifeguards. These findings mean required training, certification or staffing records were missing at the time of inspection.

    Recorded 3 times across 3 separate inspections, most recently on September 29, 2026. For example: Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

15 inspections

  1. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • An appropriate anti-entrapment plan was not developed.Ensure an appropriate anti-entrapment plan is developed.
  2. Monitoring Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • The flow meter appeared to be non-operational during the inspection; therefore, the filtration flow rate could not be determined.Repair or replace the flow meter to ensure it is operational and accurately indicates the flow rate.
    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • An appropriate anti-entrapment plan was not developed.Ensure an appropriate anti-entrapment plan is developed.
  3. Monitoring Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 12. Are the general safety devices and physical conditions in this pool providing a safe environment (Critical)?
      • The operator did not know the end-of-life date of the main drain suction covers.Ensure the main drain suction covers are not expired.
    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • An appropriate anti-entrapment plan was not developed.General sanitation plan was not developed.Written policies for response to water quality issues were not observed.Rules and safety information posted were incomplete.Safety and supervision plan was not observed.
  4. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  5. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • 1. Routine water sample result: HPC – 860 CFU/mlClose the pool from public use immediately. Shock chlorinate the pool. After shock chlorinating, backwash the filter. Re-balance the water chemistry to bring the free chlorine level to at least 1.0ppm. The pool can then be re-opened to the public.Resample on your regular sampling day
  6. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  7. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  8. Monitoring Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Water Temperature: 35.2 degrees Celsius.pH: 7.34.Alk: Over Range - Too High. Corrected during the Inspection - measured to be at 100 ppm. Cl: Over Range - Too High. Corrected during the Inspection - measured to be at 5 ppm.ORP: 729.
    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water Temperature: 35.2 degrees Celsius.pH: 7.34.Alk: Over Range - Too High. Corrected during the Inspection - measured to be at 100 ppm. Cl: Over Range - Too High. Corrected during the Inspection - measured to be at 5 ppm.ORP: 729.
  9. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  10. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • TC Present.
  11. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  12. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  13. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Pseudomonas found in sample.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • HPC @ 2030.
  14. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  15. Monitoring Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Water Temperature: 33.5 degrees Celsius.pH: 7.5.Alk: 33 ppm. - Recommend increasing to 60-180 ppm.Cl: 20 ppm. - Recommend lowering to between 2-10 ppm.ORP: 707. Water chemistry was tested onsite and found to be outside of required safe ranges at the time of Inspection.This was corrected during the Inspection. The Chlorine Pump was turned off in order to lower Chlorine levels.Ensure that the levels are monitored more closely going forward.
    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water Temperature: 33.5 degrees Celsius.pH: 7.5.Alk: 33 ppm. - Recommend increasing to 60-180 ppm.Cl: 20 ppm. - Recommend lowering to between 2-10 ppm.ORP: 707. Water chemistry was tested onsite and found to be outside of required safe ranges at the time of Inspection.This was corrected during the Inspection. The Chlorine Pump was turned off in order to lower Chlorine levels.Ensure that the levels are monitored more closely going forward.
Own this business? Add a badge to your website