Skip to content
Loading map…

Village Centre - Lap Pool

166 Mahogany Centre SE Calgary AB T3M 2V6 · Aquatic Facility

12 inspections

  1. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Turnover rate calculated at 4.16 hours. Increase flow to reduce turnover rate to 4 hours or less. Do not exceed 260gpm as that is the max flow rate for the floor drains.
  2. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Non-urgent sample received during the holiday long weekend without approval. The sample was not processed - please submit a new sample.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Turnover rate calculated at 4.16 hours. Increase flow to reduce turnover rate to 4 hours or less. Do not exceed 260gpm as that is the max flow rate for the floor drains.
  3. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample was submitted during weekend/holiday without approval and therefore was not processed. Please submit a new sample.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Turnover rate calculated at 4.16 hours. Increase flow to reduce turnover rate to 4 hours or less. Do not exceed 260gpm as that is the max flow rate for the floor drains.
  4. Monitoring Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Turnover rate calculated at 4.16 hours. Increase flow to reduce turnover rate to 4 hours or less. Do not exceed 260gpm as that is the max flow rate for the floor drains.
  5. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Sample was rejected as no time was noted on the requisition. -resampleID: 25ES-219E00335
    • 12. Are the general safety devices and physical conditions in this pool providing a safe environment (Critical)?
      • The flow rate of the recirculation system is above the max. flow rate of the submerged suction outlet. Flow rate was reduced by adjusting the valves. However, this cannot be a long-term solution. The submerged suction outlet must be qualified for the maximum flow rate of the recirculation system. Please determine max. flow rate and replace with appropriate main drain covers.
  6. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • July 3rd water sample received by the lab was not dated.
    • 12. Are the general safety devices and physical conditions in this pool providing a safe environment (Critical)?
      • The flow rate of the recirculation system is above the max. flow rate of the submerged suction outlet. Flow rate was reduced by adjusting the valves. However, this cannot be a long-term solution. The submerged suction outlet must be qualified for the maximum flow rate of the recirculation system. Please determine max. flow rate and replace with appropriate main drain covers.
  7. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 12. Are the general safety devices and physical conditions in this pool providing a safe environment (Critical)?
      • The flow rate of the recirculation system is above the max. flow rate of the submerged suction outlet. Flow rate was reduced by adjusting the valves. However, this cannot be a long-term solution. The submerged suction outlet must be qualified for the maximum flow rate of the recirculation system. Please determine max. flow rate and replace with appropriate main drain covers.
  8. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • June 5, 2025 water sample had 1050 HPC. Treat and resample.
    • 12. Are the general safety devices and physical conditions in this pool providing a safe environment (Critical)?
      • The flow rate of the recirculation system is above the max. flow rate of the submerged suction outlet. Flow rate was reduced by adjusting the valves. However, this cannot be a long-term solution. The submerged suction outlet must be qualified for the maximum flow rate of the recirculation system. Please determine max. flow rate and replace with appropriate main drain covers.
  9. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Nov. 8, 2024 water sample had 870 HPC. Spoke with Jordan to resample
    • 12. Are the general safety devices and physical conditions in this pool providing a safe environment (Critical)?
      • The flow rate of the recirculation system is above the max. flow rate of the submerged suction outlet. Flow rate was reduced by adjusting the valves. However, this cannot be a long-term solution. The submerged suction outlet must be qualified for the maximum flow rate of the recirculation system. Please determine max. flow rate and replace with appropriate main drain covers.
  10. Monitoring Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 12. Are the general safety devices and physical conditions in this pool providing a safe environment (Critical)?
      • The flow rate of the recirculation system is above the max. flow rate of the submerged suction outlet. Flow rate was reduced by adjusting the valves. However, this cannot be a long-term solution. The submerged suction outlet must be qualified for the maximum flow rate of the recirculation system. Please determine max. flow rate and replace with appropriate main drain covers.
  11. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • July 25th sample was cancelled by the lab as there was no identification number on the bottle. Emailed operator Paul Eddy to resample.
  12. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions