Skip to content
Loading map…

Brar Sweets & Restaurant

11-13-199 Advance Blvd Brampton ON L6T 4N2 · Restaurant

Inspection summary

Brar Sweets & Restaurant has been inspected 6 times by Peel Public Health (Region of Peel) since November 19, 2024. The most recent inspection, on July 24, 2026, recorded 2 infractions.

None of the 6 inspections on record were free of infractions. In the past 12 months there were 3 inspections with 8 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Cleaning and sanitizing, Handwashing and staff hygiene and Pests.

The number of infractions per inspection has stayed roughly the same over time.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their violations differently, so we group them by what they mean for food safety. Higher-risk findings are the ones inspectors treat as critical, because they can directly make someone sick.

  • Cleaning and sanitizingHigher risk

    Anything that touches food, such as cutting boards, dishes and utensils, must be washed, rinsed and sanitized. Inspectors check dishwasher temperatures, sanitizer strength and how wiping cloths are stored. Poor sanitizing lets bacteria survive from one use to the next.

    Recorded 3 times across 3 separate inspections, most recently on March 30, 2026. For example: Did operator provide a test reagent to determine the concentration of sanitizer?

  • Handwashing and staff hygieneHigher risk

    Hands are the main way germs like norovirus move from people to food. Inspectors look for stocked, accessible handwashing sinks, staff washing hands when required, hair restraints, and sick employees being kept away from food. Gaps here can spread illness quickly.

    Recorded once on July 24, 2026. For example: Did operator provide the required supplies at each handwashing station?

  • PestsHigher risk

    Signs of mice, rats, cockroaches or flies, or gaps and clutter that let them get in or hide. Pests carry bacteria and can contaminate food and surfaces, so evidence of activity is treated seriously and usually triggers a follow-up visit.

    Recorded once on July 24, 2026. For example: Did operator protect the premises against the entry of pests and maintain records of all pest control measures?

  • Protecting food from contaminationHigher risk

    This covers how food is stored, prepared and displayed: raw meat kept away from ready-to-eat food, food covered and stored off the floor, and nothing dripping or splashing into it. Cross-contamination from raw to cooked food is a direct route for salmonella and E. coli.

    Recorded once on November 13, 2025. For example: Did operator store food to prevent contamination and/or adulteration? (Significant Risk)

  • Food temperature controlHigher risk

    Bacteria multiply fastest between about 4 °C and 60 °C (40 °F to 140 °F). Inspectors check that cold food stays cold, hot food stays hot, cooked food is cooled quickly, and that staff have accurate thermometers. Temperature problems are one of the most common causes of food poisoning, so these are treated as critical findings.

    Recorded once on April 1, 2025. For example: Did operator keep potentially hazardous food out of the temperature danger zone, and provide adequately sized refrigeration and/or hot-holding equipment/space for the safe storage of such food? (Significant risk)

About this data

These results come from Peel Public Health (Region of Peel), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

6 inspections

  1. Required

    2 infractions

    • Did operator provide the required supplies at each handwashing station?
    • Did operator protect the premises against the entry of pests and maintain records of all pest control measures?
  2. Required

    2 infractions

    • Did food handler(s) wash hands to prevent contamination of food and/or food contact surfaces? (Significant Risk)
    • Did operator provide a test reagent to determine the concentration of sanitizer?
  3. Required

    4 infractions

    • Did operator store food to prevent contamination and/or adulteration? (Significant Risk)
    • Did operator provide an adequate number of handwashing stations that are conveniently accessible to food handlers?
    • Did operator properly wash and sanitize utensils?
    • Did operator collect and remove garbage and waste including liquid waste to maintain the premises in a clean and sanitary condition?
  4. Required

    2 infractions

    • Did every food handler(s) follow proper hygiene practices while working with food?
    • Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?
  5. Required

    3 infractions

    • Did operator keep potentially hazardous food out of the temperature danger zone, and provide adequately sized refrigeration and/or hot-holding equipment/space for the safe storage of such food? (Significant risk)
    • Did operator provide a test reagent to determine the concentration of sanitizer?
    • Did operator maintain the mechanical ventilation system to remove odours, fumes, vapours, smoke and excessive heat?
  6. Required

    3 infractions

    • Did operator provide a supply of potable hot and cold running water under pressure?
    • Did food handler(s) wash hands to prevent contamination of food and/or food contact surfaces? (Significant Risk)
    • Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website