Skip to content
Loading map…

Brilliant Minds Montessori Centre

1275 Mississauga Valley Blvd Mississauga ON L5A 3R8 · IPAC - Child Care - Off-site Food Preparation

Inspection summary

Brilliant Minds Montessori Centre has been inspected 7 times by Peel Public Health (Region of Peel) since October 23, 2024. The most recent inspection, on July 16, 2026, recorded 3 infractions.

1 of 7 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 3 inspections with 4 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Food temperature control, Cleaning and sanitizing and Pests.

Recent inspections have recorded fewer infractions than earlier ones, so the record is improving.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for the people in care. Higher-risk findings are the ones that could directly make someone sick, and they matter more here because young children, older adults and people who are unwell are more vulnerable to infection.

  • Food temperature controlHigher risk

    Inspectors check that anything that has to be kept at a set temperature, such as chilled or hot food, or equipment like sterilizers, stays in its safe range and that accurate thermometers are on hand. With food, temperature problems are one of the most common causes of food poisoning.

    Recorded 3 times across 3 separate inspections, most recently on September 17, 2025. For example: Did operator keep potentially hazardous food out of the temperature danger zone, and provide adequately sized refrigeration and/or hot-holding equipment/space for the safe storage of such food? (Significant risk)

  • Cleaning and sanitizingHigher risk

    Surfaces, dishes and tools that touch food or people must be cleaned and then sanitized or disinfected. Inspectors check sanitizer strength, dishwasher temperatures and how cleaning is done. Poor sanitizing lets germs survive from one use to the next.

    Recorded 2 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on July 16, 2026. For example: Did operator provide a mechanical dishwasher or, two or three compartment sinks of sufficient size and drainage racks for washing, sanitizing and draining utensils?

  • PestsHigher risk

    Signs of mice, rats, cockroaches or flies, or gaps and clutter that let them get in or hide. Pests carry bacteria and can contaminate food, supplies and surfaces, so evidence of activity is treated seriously and usually triggers a follow-up visit.

    Recorded once on July 16, 2026. For example: Did operator protect the premises against the entry of pests and maintain records of all pest control measures?

  • Food safety training and certificationLower risk

    Many jurisdictions require a trained or certified person on site, such as a certified food handler. These findings mean the training record or the trained person was missing at the time. They do not by themselves mean anything was handled unsafely.

    Recorded 4 times across 3 separate inspections, most recently on February 10, 2025. For example: Did operator provide an adequate number of handwashing stations that are conveniently accessible to food handlers?

  • Equipment and utensilsLower risk

    Equipment has to be made of cleanable materials, kept in good repair and stored properly. These findings are mostly about upkeep, like a cracked surface or worn part. They are generally lower risk but show how well the place is maintained.

    Recorded once on April 1, 2026. For example: Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?

About this data

These results come from Peel Public Health (Region of Peel), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

7 inspections

  1. Required

    3 infractions

    • Did the operator process food in a manner that makes it safe to eat? (Significant risk)
    • Did operator provide a mechanical dishwasher or, two or three compartment sinks of sufficient size and drainage racks for washing, sanitizing and draining utensils?
    • Did operator protect the premises against the entry of pests and maintain records of all pest control measures?
  2. Required

    1 infraction

    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
  3. Required

    0 infractions

  4. Required

    2 infractions

    • Did operator keep potentially hazardous food out of the temperature danger zone, and provide adequately sized refrigeration and/or hot-holding equipment/space for the safe storage of such food? (Significant risk)
    • Did operator properly maintain food contact surfaces?
  5. Required

    2 infractions

    • Did operator provide and use accurate and easy-to-read thermometers?
    • Did operator provide an adequate number of handwashing stations that are conveniently accessible to food handlers?
  6. Follow-up

    2 infractions

    • Did operator provide an adequate number of handwashing stations that are conveniently accessible to food handlers?
    • Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?
  7. Required

    4 infractions

    • Did the operator process food in a manner that makes it safe to eat? (Significant risk)
    • Did operator keep potentially hazardous food out of the temperature danger zone, and provide adequately sized refrigeration and/or hot-holding equipment/space for the safe storage of such food? (Significant risk)
    • Did operator provide an adequate number of handwashing stations that are conveniently accessible to food handlers?
    • Did food handler(s) wash hands to prevent contamination of food and/or food contact surfaces? (Significant Risk)

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website