Skip to content
Loading map…

Burger Factory

51-3525 Odyssey Dr Mississauga ON L5M 2S4 · Restaurant

Inspection summary

Burger Factory has been inspected 4 times by Peel Public Health (Region of Peel) since August 28, 2024. The most recent inspection, on February 10, 2026, recorded 3 infractions.

None of the 4 inspections on record were free of infractions. In the past 12 months there was 1 inspection with 3 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Pests, Cleaning and sanitizing and Handwashing and staff hygiene.

Recent inspections have recorded fewer infractions than earlier ones, so the record is improving.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their violations differently, so we group them by what they mean for food safety. Higher-risk findings are the ones inspectors treat as critical, because they can directly make someone sick.

  • PestsHigher risk

    Signs of mice, rats, cockroaches or flies, or gaps and clutter that let them get in or hide. Pests carry bacteria and can contaminate food and surfaces, so evidence of activity is treated seriously and usually triggers a follow-up visit.

    Recorded 4 times across 4 separate inspections, most recently on February 10, 2026. For example: Did operator protect the premises against the entry of pests and maintain records of all pest control measures?

  • Cleaning and sanitizingHigher risk

    Anything that touches food, such as cutting boards, dishes and utensils, must be washed, rinsed and sanitized. Inspectors check dishwasher temperatures, sanitizer strength and how wiping cloths are stored. Poor sanitizing lets bacteria survive from one use to the next.

    Recorded 2 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on January 17, 2025. For example: Did operator provide a test reagent to determine the concentration of sanitizer?

  • Handwashing and staff hygieneHigher risk

    Hands are the main way germs like norovirus move from people to food. Inspectors look for stocked, accessible handwashing sinks, staff washing hands when required, hair restraints, and sick employees being kept away from food. Gaps here can spread illness quickly.

    Recorded once on February 10, 2026. For example: Did operator provide the required supplies at each handwashing station?

  • Building, plumbing and upkeepLower risk

    Floors, walls and ceilings must be smooth and clean, with working lighting, ventilation, plumbing, hot and cold water, and washrooms. These are rarely an immediate food-safety risk on their own, but persistent problems can lead to pest or sanitation issues.

    Recorded 3 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on January 17, 2025. For example: Did operator provide a supply of potable hot and cold running water under pressure?

  • Equipment and utensilsLower risk

    Equipment has to be built from cleanable materials, kept in good repair and stored properly. These findings are mostly about upkeep, like a cracked shelf, a worn gasket or utensils stored the wrong way. They are generally lower risk but show how well the kitchen is maintained.

    Recorded once on February 10, 2026. For example: Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?

About this data

These results come from Peel Public Health (Region of Peel), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

4 inspections

  1. Required

    3 infractions

    • Did operator provide the required supplies at each handwashing station?
    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
    • Did operator protect the premises against the entry of pests and maintain records of all pest control measures?
  2. Required

    1 infraction

    • Did operator protect the premises against the entry of pests and maintain records of all pest control measures?
  3. Required

    3 infractions

    • Did operator provide a supply of potable hot and cold running water under pressure?
    • Did operator provide a test reagent to determine the concentration of sanitizer?
    • Did operator protect the premises against the entry of pests and maintain records of all pest control measures?
  4. Required

    4 infractions

    • Did operator provide a supply of potable hot and cold running water under pressure?
    • Did operator provide a test reagent to determine the concentration of sanitizer?
    • Did operator protect the premises against the entry of pests and maintain records of all pest control measures?
    • Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website