Skip to content
Loading map…

Chartwell Robert Speck - Food Service

100 Robert Speck Pky Mississauga ON L4Z 0A1 · Retirement Home

Inspection summary

Chartwell Robert Speck - Food Service has been inspected 8 times by Peel Public Health (Region of Peel) since December 3, 2024. The most recent inspection, on August 12, 2026, recorded 1 infraction.

None of the 8 inspections on record were free of infractions. In the past 12 months there were 5 inspections with 16 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Food temperature control, Cleaning and sanitizing and Pests.

Recent inspections have recorded fewer infractions than earlier ones, so the record is improving.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for the people in care. Higher-risk findings are the ones that could directly make someone sick, and they matter more here because young children, older adults and people who are unwell are more vulnerable to infection.

  • Food temperature controlHigher risk

    Inspectors check that anything that has to be kept at a set temperature, such as chilled or hot food, or equipment like sterilizers, stays in its safe range and that accurate thermometers are on hand. With food, temperature problems are one of the most common causes of food poisoning.

    Recorded 4 times across 4 separate inspections, most recently on July 17, 2026. For example: Did operator keep potentially hazardous food out of the temperature danger zone, and provide adequately sized refrigeration and/or hot-holding equipment/space for the safe storage of such food? (Significant risk)

  • Cleaning and sanitizingHigher risk

    Surfaces, dishes and tools that touch food or people must be cleaned and then sanitized or disinfected. Inspectors check sanitizer strength, dishwasher temperatures and how cleaning is done. Poor sanitizing lets germs survive from one use to the next.

    Recorded 4 times across 4 separate inspections, most recently on July 17, 2026. For example: Did operator properly maintain food contact surfaces?

  • PestsHigher risk

    Signs of mice, rats, cockroaches or flies, or gaps and clutter that let them get in or hide. Pests carry bacteria and can contaminate food, supplies and surfaces, so evidence of activity is treated seriously and usually triggers a follow-up visit.

    Recorded 4 times across 4 separate inspections, most recently on November 6, 2025. For example: Did operator take adequate measures to maintain food premises in a condition that prevent harbourage or breeding of pests? (Significant Risk)

  • Protecting food from contaminationHigher risk

    This covers how food and supplies are stored and handled: kept covered, off the floor, and away from anything that could contaminate them. Where food is served, raw meat must be kept away from ready-to-eat food, a direct route for salmonella and E. coli.

    Recorded 3 times across 3 separate inspections, most recently on February 17, 2026. For example: Did operator store food to prevent contamination and/or adulteration? (Significant Risk)

  • Equipment and utensilsLower risk

    Equipment has to be made of cleanable materials, kept in good repair and stored properly. These findings are mostly about upkeep, like a cracked surface or worn part. They are generally lower risk but show how well the place is maintained.

    Recorded 6 times across 6 separate inspections, most recently on August 12, 2026. For example: Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?

About this data

These results come from Peel Public Health (Region of Peel), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

8 inspections

  1. Follow-up

    1 infraction

    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
  2. Required

    3 infractions

    • Did operator keep potentially hazardous food out of the temperature danger zone, and provide adequately sized refrigeration and/or hot-holding equipment/space for the safe storage of such food? (Significant risk)
    • Did operator properly maintain food contact surfaces?
    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
  3. Required

    3 infractions

    • Did operator store food to prevent contamination and/or adulteration? (Significant Risk)
    • Did operator properly maintain food contact surfaces?
    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
  4. Follow-up

    3 infractions

    • Did operator keep potentially hazardous food out of the temperature danger zone, and provide adequately sized refrigeration and/or hot-holding equipment/space for the safe storage of such food? (Significant risk)
    • Did operator properly maintain food contact surfaces?
    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
  5. Required

    6 infractions

    • Did operator store food to prevent contamination and/or adulteration? (Significant Risk)
    • Did operator properly maintain food contact surfaces?
    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
    • Did operator maintain the mechanical ventilation system to remove odours, fumes, vapours, smoke and excessive heat?
    • Did operator take adequate measures to maintain food premises in a condition that prevent harbourage or breeding of pests? (Significant Risk)
    • Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?
  6. Required

    3 infractions

    • Did operator keep potentially hazardous food out of the temperature danger zone, and provide adequately sized refrigeration and/or hot-holding equipment/space for the safe storage of such food? (Significant risk)
    • Did operator take adequate measures to maintain food premises in a condition that prevent harbourage or breeding of pests? (Significant Risk)
    • Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?
  7. Required

    3 infractions

    • Did operator keep potentially hazardous food out of the temperature danger zone, and provide adequately sized refrigeration and/or hot-holding equipment/space for the safe storage of such food? (Significant risk)
    • Did operator protect the premises against the entry of pests and maintain records of all pest control measures?
    • Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?
  8. Required

    4 infractions

    • Did operator store food to prevent contamination and/or adulteration? (Significant Risk)
    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
    • Did operator protect the premises against the entry of pests and maintain records of all pest control measures?
    • Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website