Skip to content
Loading map…

Chibugan Eh!

F2-888 Dundas St E Mississauga ON L4Y 4G6 · Food Take Out

Inspection summary

Chibugan Eh! has been inspected 6 times by Peel Public Health (Region of Peel) since January 3, 2025. The most recent inspection, on August 25, 2026, found no infractions.

2 of 6 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 3 inspections with 7 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Cleaning and sanitizing, Pests and Food temperature control.

The last 2 inspections in a row found no infractions. The number of infractions per inspection has stayed roughly the same over time.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their violations differently, so we group them by what they mean for food safety. Higher-risk findings are the ones inspectors treat as critical, because they can directly make someone sick.

  • Cleaning and sanitizingHigher risk

    Anything that touches food, such as cutting boards, dishes and utensils, must be washed, rinsed and sanitized. Inspectors check dishwasher temperatures, sanitizer strength and how wiping cloths are stored. Poor sanitizing lets bacteria survive from one use to the next.

    Recorded 2 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on February 9, 2026. For example: Did operator properly maintain food contact surfaces?

  • PestsHigher risk

    Signs of mice, rats, cockroaches or flies, or gaps and clutter that let them get in or hide. Pests carry bacteria and can contaminate food and surfaces, so evidence of activity is treated seriously and usually triggers a follow-up visit.

    Recorded 2 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on February 9, 2026. For example: Did operator protect the premises against the entry of pests and maintain records of all pest control measures?

  • Food temperature controlHigher risk

    Bacteria multiply fastest between about 4 °C and 60 °C (40 °F to 140 °F). Inspectors check that cold food stays cold, hot food stays hot, cooked food is cooled quickly, and that staff have accurate thermometers. Temperature problems are one of the most common causes of food poisoning, so these are treated as critical findings.

    Recorded once on February 9, 2026. For example: Did operator keep potentially hazardous food out of the temperature danger zone, and provide adequately sized refrigeration and/or hot-holding equipment/space for the safe storage of such food? (Significant risk)

  • Handwashing and staff hygieneHigher risk

    Hands are the main way germs like norovirus move from people to food. Inspectors look for stocked, accessible handwashing sinks, staff washing hands when required, hair restraints, and sick employees being kept away from food. Gaps here can spread illness quickly.

    Recorded once on February 9, 2026. For example: Did operator provide the required supplies at each handwashing station?

  • Equipment and utensilsLower risk

    Equipment has to be built from cleanable materials, kept in good repair and stored properly. These findings are mostly about upkeep, like a cracked shelf, a worn gasket or utensils stored the wrong way. They are generally lower risk but show how well the kitchen is maintained.

    Recorded 3 times across 3 separate inspections, most recently on February 9, 2026. For example: Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?

About this data

These results come from Peel Public Health (Region of Peel), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

6 inspections

  1. Required

    0 infractions

  2. Follow-up

    0 infractions

  3. Required

    7 infractions

    • Did operator keep potentially hazardous food out of the temperature danger zone, and provide adequately sized refrigeration and/or hot-holding equipment/space for the safe storage of such food? (Significant risk)
    • Did operator properly maintain food contact surfaces?
    • Did operator provide the required supplies at each handwashing station?
    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
    • Did operator protect the premises against the entry of pests and maintain records of all pest control measures?
    • Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?
    • Is at least one food handler/supervisor with valid food handler certification present on-site during every hour of operation?
  4. Complaint

    1 infraction

    • Did food handler(s) wash hands to prevent contamination of food and/or food contact surfaces? (Significant Risk)
  5. Required

    3 infractions

    • Did operator properly maintain food contact surfaces?
    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
    • Did operator protect the premises against the entry of pests and maintain records of all pest control measures?
  6. Required

    1 infraction

    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website