Skip to content
Loading map…

Freshly Squeezed

162-499 Main St S Brampton ON L6Y 1N7 · Food Take Out

Inspection summary

Freshly Squeezed has been inspected 5 times by Peel Public Health (Region of Peel) since January 20, 2025. The most recent inspection, on September 3, 2026, recorded 4 infractions.

None of the 5 inspections on record were free of infractions. In the past 12 months there were 4 inspections with 14 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Cleaning and sanitizing and Pests.

Recent inspections have recorded fewer infractions than earlier ones, so the record is improving.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their violations differently, so we group them by what they mean for food safety. Higher-risk findings are the ones inspectors treat as critical, because they can directly make someone sick.

  • Cleaning and sanitizingHigher risk

    Anything that touches food, such as cutting boards, dishes and utensils, must be washed, rinsed and sanitized. Inspectors check dishwasher temperatures, sanitizer strength and how wiping cloths are stored. Poor sanitizing lets bacteria survive from one use to the next.

    Recorded 4 times across 4 separate inspections, most recently on September 3, 2026. For example: Did operator properly wash and sanitize utensils?

  • PestsHigher risk

    Signs of mice, rats, cockroaches or flies, or gaps and clutter that let them get in or hide. Pests carry bacteria and can contaminate food and surfaces, so evidence of activity is treated seriously and usually triggers a follow-up visit.

    Recorded 4 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on November 17, 2025. For example: Did operator protect the premises against the entry of pests and maintain records of all pest control measures?

  • Food safety training and certificationLower risk

    Most jurisdictions require a certified food handler or manager on site, and some require allergen or food-worker training. These findings mean the paperwork or the trained person was missing at the time. They do not by themselves mean food was handled unsafely.

    Recorded 5 times across 4 separate inspections, most recently on September 3, 2026. For example: Is at least one food handler/supervisor with valid food handler certification present on-site during every hour of operation?

  • Building, plumbing and upkeepLower risk

    Floors, walls and ceilings must be smooth and clean, with working lighting, ventilation, plumbing, hot and cold water, and washrooms. These are rarely an immediate food-safety risk on their own, but persistent problems can lead to pest or sanitation issues.

    Recorded 3 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on September 3, 2026. For example: Did operator provide a supply of potable hot and cold running water under pressure?

  • Equipment and utensilsLower risk

    Equipment has to be built from cleanable materials, kept in good repair and stored properly. These findings are mostly about upkeep, like a cracked shelf, a worn gasket or utensils stored the wrong way. They are generally lower risk but show how well the kitchen is maintained.

    Recorded once on January 20, 2025. For example: Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?

About this data

These results come from Peel Public Health (Region of Peel), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

5 inspections

  1. Required

    4 infractions

    • Did operator provide a supply of potable hot and cold running water under pressure?
    • Did operator properly wash and sanitize utensils?
    • Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?
    • Is at least one food handler/supervisor with valid food handler certification present on-site during every hour of operation?
  2. Required

    1 infraction

    • Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?
  3. Follow-up

    4 infractions

    • Did operator properly maintain food contact surfaces?
    • Did operator protect the premises against the entry of pests and maintain records of all pest control measures?
    • Did operator take adequate measures to maintain food premises in a condition that prevent harbourage or breeding of pests? (Significant Risk)
    • Is at least one food handler/supervisor with valid food handler certification present on-site during every hour of operation?
  4. Required

    5 infractions

    • Did operator properly maintain food contact surfaces?
    • Did food handler(s) wash hands to prevent contamination of food and/or food contact surfaces? (Significant Risk)
    • Did operator protect the premises against the entry of pests and maintain records of all pest control measures?
    • Did operator take adequate measures to maintain food premises in a condition that prevent harbourage or breeding of pests? (Critical Risk)
    • Is at least one food handler/supervisor with valid food handler certification present on-site during every hour of operation?
  5. Required

    3 infractions

    • Did operator provide a test reagent to determine the concentration of sanitizer?
    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
    • Is at least one food handler/supervisor with valid food handler certification present on-site during every hour of operation?

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website