Skip to content
Loading map…

Hilton Garden Inn Toronto Airport - The Dixon

3311 Caroga Dr Mississauga ON L4V 1A3 · Restaurant

Inspection summary

Hilton Garden Inn Toronto Airport - The Dixon has been inspected 5 times by Peel Public Health (Region of Peel) since December 18, 2024. The most recent inspection, on September 1, 2026, recorded 5 infractions.

None of the 5 inspections on record were free of infractions. In the past 12 months there were 3 inspections with 8 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Pests and Cleaning and sanitizing.

Recent inspections have recorded more infractions than earlier ones, so it is worth reading the latest reports closely.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their violations differently, so we group them by what they mean for food safety. Higher-risk findings are the ones inspectors treat as critical, because they can directly make someone sick.

  • PestsHigher risk

    Signs of mice, rats, cockroaches or flies, or gaps and clutter that let them get in or hide. Pests carry bacteria and can contaminate food and surfaces, so evidence of activity is treated seriously and usually triggers a follow-up visit.

    Recorded 5 times across 4 separate inspections, most recently on September 1, 2026. For example: Did operator protect the premises against the entry of pests and maintain records of all pest control measures?

  • Cleaning and sanitizingHigher risk

    Anything that touches food, such as cutting boards, dishes and utensils, must be washed, rinsed and sanitized. Inspectors check dishwasher temperatures, sanitizer strength and how wiping cloths are stored. Poor sanitizing lets bacteria survive from one use to the next.

    Recorded 2 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on September 1, 2026. For example: Did operator provide a test reagent to determine the concentration of sanitizer?

  • Equipment and utensilsLower risk

    Equipment has to be built from cleanable materials, kept in good repair and stored properly. These findings are mostly about upkeep, like a cracked shelf, a worn gasket or utensils stored the wrong way. They are generally lower risk but show how well the kitchen is maintained.

    Recorded 2 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on September 1, 2026. For example: Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?

  • Building, plumbing and upkeepLower risk

    Floors, walls and ceilings must be smooth and clean, with working lighting, ventilation, plumbing, hot and cold water, and washrooms. These are rarely an immediate food-safety risk on their own, but persistent problems can lead to pest or sanitation issues.

    Recorded 2 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on September 1, 2026. For example: Did operator maintain the mechanical ventilation system to remove odours, fumes, vapours, smoke and excessive heat?

About this data

These results come from Peel Public Health (Region of Peel), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

5 inspections

  1. Required

    5 infractions

    • Did operator provide a test reagent to determine the concentration of sanitizer?
    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
    • Did operator maintain the mechanical ventilation system to remove odours, fumes, vapours, smoke and excessive heat?
    • Did operator protect the premises against the entry of pests and maintain records of all pest control measures?
    • Did operator take adequate measures to maintain food premises in a condition that prevent harbourage or breeding of pests? (Significant Risk)
  2. Required

    1 infraction

    • Did operator provide a test reagent to determine the concentration of sanitizer?
  3. Required

    2 infractions

    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
    • Did operator take adequate measures to maintain food premises in a condition that prevent harbourage or breeding of pests? (Significant Risk)
  4. Required

    1 infraction

    • Did operator take adequate measures to maintain food premises in a condition that prevent harbourage or breeding of pests? (Significant Risk)
  5. Required

    2 infractions

    • Did operator take adequate measures to maintain food premises in a condition that prevent harbourage or breeding of pests? (Significant Risk)
    • Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website