Skip to content
Loading map…

Humpty's Big Plate Diner 20

1343 Trans Way SE Medicine Hat AB T1B 1J1Canada · Food - General

Inspection summary

Humpty's Big Plate Diner 20 has been inspected 10 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since January 3, 2024. The most recent inspection, on June 4, 2026, found no infractions.

5 of 10 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 3 inspections with 5 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Pests and Cleaning and sanitizing.

The number of infractions per inspection has stayed roughly the same over time.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their violations differently, so we group them by what they mean for food safety. Higher-risk findings are the ones inspectors treat as critical, because they can directly make someone sick.

  • PestsHigher risk

    Signs of mice, rats, cockroaches or flies, or gaps and clutter that let them get in or hide. Pests carry bacteria and can contaminate food and surfaces, so evidence of activity is treated seriously and usually triggers a follow-up visit.

    Recorded 2 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on May 4, 2026. For example: Is the facility free of unapproved animals, vermin and/or insects (unless noted elsewhere), and maintained to prevent the entry or harbourage of pests?

  • Cleaning and sanitizingHigher risk

    Anything that touches food, such as cutting boards, dishes and utensils, must be washed, rinsed and sanitized. Inspectors check dishwasher temperatures, sanitizer strength and how wiping cloths are stored. Poor sanitizing lets bacteria survive from one use to the next.

    Recorded 2 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on November 21, 2025. For example: Does the operator use approved methods for cleaning and sanitizing equipment, utensils, and surfaces?

  • Food safety training and certificationLower risk

    Most jurisdictions require a certified food handler or manager on site, and some require allergen or food-worker training. These findings mean the paperwork or the trained person was missing at the time. They do not by themselves mean food was handled unsafely.

    Recorded 3 times across 3 separate inspections, most recently on October 22, 2024. For example: Do food handlers ensure that food is protected from contamination (unless noted elsewhere)(Non-Critical)?

  • Building, plumbing and upkeepLower risk

    Floors, walls and ceilings must be smooth and clean, with working lighting, ventilation, plumbing, hot and cold water, and washrooms. These are rarely an immediate food-safety risk on their own, but persistent problems can lead to pest or sanitation issues.

    Recorded 2 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on November 21, 2025. For example: Is the facility maintained in a clean and sanitary condition?

  • Permits, records and postingLower risk

    Operating permits, required signage, written procedures and logs. These findings are administrative: the documentation was missing or out of date at the time of inspection.

    Recorded once on November 21, 2025. For example: Does the facility have a valid permit and does the facility operate in compliance with the conditions of that permit, or is the facility awaiting approval prior to operation?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

10 inspections

  1. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  2. Monitoring Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 16. Is the facility free of unapproved animals, vermin and/or insects (unless noted elsewhere), and maintained to prevent the entry or harbourage of pests?
      • Upon entering the facility, the front door was ajar and does not easily close, it scrapes along the ground. This can allow pests to enter the facility.
  3. Monitoring Inspection

    4 infractions

    • 04. Does the operator use approved methods for cleaning and sanitizing equipment, utensils, and surfaces?
      • The quats sanitizer in the bucket next to the dishwasher was not at an adequate concentration. The operator promptly created a new solution which measured 200ppm.
    • 16. Is the facility free of unapproved animals, vermin and/or insects (unless noted elsewhere), and maintained to prevent the entry or harbourage of pests?
      • There is a gap at the bottom of the receiving door. *Please replace weatherstripping to seal the gap and prevent pest entry.
    • 19. Does the facility have a valid permit and does the facility operate in compliance with the conditions of that permit, or is the facility awaiting approval prior to operation?
      • The displayed food handling permit was not up to date. The operator provided a current one and posted it.
    • 23. Is the facility maintained in a clean and sanitary condition?
      • The wall behind the laundry hamper in the dry storage room is covered in grime. *Thoroughly clean the wall next to the laundry hamper.
  4. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  5. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  6. Monitoring Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 08. Do food handlers ensure that food is protected from contamination (unless noted elsewhere)(Non-Critical)?
      • A phone and a cup of water were on top of the cutting board of the food prep cooler. The items were promptly removed by staff and the cutting board was removed for cleaning. Ensure all personal items not associated with food preparation are stored in a separate, dedicated area where it will not contaminate any food/equipment.
    • 22. Are utensils and equipment maintained in a condition and a manner that ensures the safe handling of food?
      • The guard for the meat slicer had a build-up of food debris. The operator promptly cleaned it.
  7. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  8. Monitoring Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 04. Does the operator use approved methods for cleaning and sanitizing equipment, utensils, and surfaces?
      • The wiping cloth was placed in a QUATs solution that tested 0ppm. when told the manager made a fresh solution that tested 200ppm.
    • 08. Do food handlers ensure that food is protected from contamination (unless noted elsewhere)(Non-Critical)?
      • 1- The flour and sugar scoops were placed directly on top of the shelf beside their containers. The scoop could get contaminated with dirt and other debris found on the shelf. When told, the manager removed for proper washing and to place them in a proper container.2- The bacon was left uncovered in the walk-in cooler. When told the manager put a wrapping film on top of the container.3- Ice was placed in a black garbage bag in the freezer. garbage bags are not food grade containers for food to be placed in. When told the manager said that their ice machine was broken and asked one of the operators to get rid of the ice in the garbage bags.4- The Flour bag was placed on the floor. When told the manager put it on the shelf.
    • 23. Is the facility maintained in a clean and sanitary condition?
      • The ceiling on top of the cold holding unit where they prepare salads and sandwiches is showing accumulation of dust and debris that could potentially contaminate the food being prepared in this area.
  9. Demand Inspection

    0 infractions

  10. Monitoring Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 08. Do food handlers ensure that food is protected from contamination (unless noted elsewhere)(Non-Critical)?
      • A liquid measuring cup was left in a bulk container of food. The cup was promptly removed by the operator.
Own this business? Add a badge to your website