Skip to content
Loading map…

Juice Co. Downtown

133 Queen Street, Charlottetown · Food Premises

Official record from Prince Edward Island →

Inspection summary

Juice Co. Downtown has been inspected 8 times by Prince Edward Island Department of Health and Wellness (Environmental Health) since January 12, 2024. The most recent inspection, on September 29, 2026, recorded 5 infractions.

4 of 8 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 2 inspections with 5 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Chemicals and toxic substances, Protecting food from contamination and Cleaning and sanitizing.

The number of infractions per inspection has stayed roughly the same over time.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their violations differently, so we group them by what they mean for food safety. Higher-risk findings are the ones inspectors treat as critical, because they can directly make someone sick.

  • Chemicals and toxic substancesHigher risk

    Cleaning products, sanitizers and pesticides must be labelled and stored away from food and food-contact surfaces. Inspectors flag chemicals that could end up in food, as well as pest treatments applied without proper supervision.

    Recorded 5 times across 3 separate inspections, most recently on September 29, 2026. For example: Chemical test kits/papers used

  • Protecting food from contaminationHigher risk

    This covers how food is stored, prepared and displayed: raw meat kept away from ready-to-eat food, food covered and stored off the floor, and nothing dripping or splashing into it. Cross-contamination from raw to cooked food is a direct route for salmonella and E. coli.

    Recorded 3 times across 3 separate inspections, most recently on September 29, 2026. For example: Food in good condition, safe and unadulterated

  • Cleaning and sanitizingHigher risk

    Anything that touches food, such as cutting boards, dishes and utensils, must be washed, rinsed and sanitized. Inspectors check dishwasher temperatures, sanitizer strength and how wiping cloths are stored. Poor sanitizing lets bacteria survive from one use to the next.

    Recorded once on September 29, 2026. For example: Dishwasher monitoring

  • PestsHigher risk

    Signs of mice, rats, cockroaches or flies, or gaps and clutter that let them get in or hide. Pests carry bacteria and can contaminate food and surfaces, so evidence of activity is treated seriously and usually triggers a follow-up visit.

    Recorded once on July 23, 2025. For example: Facility free from pests

  • Handwashing and staff hygieneHigher risk

    Hands are the main way germs like norovirus move from people to food. Inspectors look for stocked, accessible handwashing sinks, staff washing hands when required, hair restraints, and sick employees being kept away from food. Gaps here can spread illness quickly.

    Recorded once on January 2, 2025. For example: Adequate handwashing facilities supplied and accessible

About this data

These results come from Prince Edward Island Department of Health and Wellness (Environmental Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

8 inspections

  1. Routine Inspection — Unsatisfactory - Warning Letter Required

    5 infractions

    • Food in good condition, safe and unadulterated
      • Failure to receive, store, process and/or transport food or food packaging materials under conditions that prevent contamination and adulteration.
    • Dishwasher monitoring
      • Failure to verify that appropriate temperatures are obtained and maintained for the correct amount of time for high temperature dishwashing units.
    • Chemical test kits/papers used
      • Failure to provide an appropriate procedure to verify sanitizer strength.
    • Valid license posted for public display
      • Operating without a valid food premises license.
    • Food safety training: Sections 5(2)(b), and 24(1-5)
      • Failure to provide proof of food safety training.
  2. Follow Up Inspection 1 — Satisfactory

    0 infractions

  3. Follow Up Inspection 1 — Satisfactory

    0 infractions

  4. Routine Inspection — Unsatisfactory - Re Inspection Required

    3 infractions

    • Premises, equipment and non food contact surfaces
      • Failure to maintain the premises and equipment in a clean and sanitary condition.
    • Facility free from pests
      • Evidence of insects.
    • Valid license posted for public display
      • License not displayed for public viewing.
  5. Follow Up Inspection 2 — Satisfactory

    0 infractions

  6. Follow Up Inspection 1 — Unsatisfactory - Warning Letter Required

    2 infractions

    • Food in good condition, safe and unadulterated
      • Failure to receive, store, process and/or transport food or food packaging materials under conditions that prevent contamination and adulteration.
    • Chemicals properly used, labelled and stored to prevent contamination
      • Failure to provide a no-rinse, food grade, chemical sanitizing solution at the appropriate concentration.
  7. Routine Inspection — Unsatisfactory - Re Inspection Required

    5 infractions

    • Adequate handwashing facilities supplied and accessible
      • Failure to provide handwashing facilities that are adequately designed appropriately located, unobstructed, for the exclusive use of employees and in numbers suitable for the operation.
    • Food in good condition, safe and unadulterated
      • Failure to receive, store, process and/or transport food or food packaging materials under conditions that prevent contamination and adulteration.
    • Chemicals properly used, labelled and stored to prevent contamination
      • Failure to provide a no-rinse, food grade, chemical sanitizing solution at the appropriate concentration.
    • Chemical test kits/papers used
      • Failure to provide an appropriate procedure to verify sanitizer strength.
    • Chemical test kits/papers used
      • Failure to establish and maintain records verifying sanitizer strength test results.
  8. Routine Inspection — Satisfactory

    0 infractions

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website