Skip to content
Loading map…

Legacy Looks

2107 110 Street NW Edmonton AB T6J 6P6 · Personal Services

Official record from Alberta →

Inspection summary

Legacy Looks has been inspected 3 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since December 10, 2025. The most recent inspection, on January 6, 2026, recorded 5 infractions.

None of the 3 inspections on record were free of infractions. In the past 12 months there were 3 inspections with 36 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Hand hygiene and infection control.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for clients. In personal service settings like salons, spas and tattoo studios, higher-risk findings are the ones that could spread infection from one client to the next, through broken skin, blood or instruments that were not properly cleaned and sterilized.

  • Hand hygiene and infection controlHigher risk

    Infection control is the core of a personal service inspection. Inspectors check that operators clean their hands and change gloves between clients, that a stocked hand sink is available, and that anything that breaks the skin is handled so blood-borne infections such as hepatitis B, hepatitis C and HIV cannot pass from one client to the next.

    Recorded 2 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on December 10, 2025. For example: Is hand hygiene performed by the personal services worker when required, in a proper manner and are provisions available to perform hand hygiene?

  • Equipment and utensilsLower risk

    Instruments, chairs, tables and footbaths must be made of materials that can be cleaned, kept in good repair and stored so they stay clean. Single-use items such as nail files, buffers, razors and needles must be thrown away after each client.

    Recorded 22 times across 3 separate inspections, most recently on January 6, 2026. For example: Is reusable equipment cleaned properly (Critical)?

  • Permits, records and postingLower risk

    Operating permits, client records, sterilization logs and required signage. Client records matter because they let health officials contact people if an infection is linked to the business.

    Recorded 5 times across 3 separate inspections, most recently on January 6, 2026. For example: Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?

  • Building, plumbing and upkeepLower risk

    The premises needs a working hand sink, a separate sink for cleaning instruments where required, cleanable surfaces, and good lighting and ventilation. Upkeep problems are usually lower risk on their own, but they make thorough cleaning harder.

    Recorded 2 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on December 10, 2025. For example: Is the facility properly constructed and maintained to allow for the safe and sanitary provision of personal services (Non-Critical)?

  • Food safety training and certificationLower risk

    Some jurisdictions require operators to complete infection-prevention training, or to hold specific qualifications for higher-risk services such as tattooing, piercing or electrolysis. These findings mean the training record was missing at the time. They do not by themselves mean a client was put at risk.

    Recorded once on December 10, 2025. For example: Has the operator notified the RHA of the existence of a personal service business, including contact and location information, as well as all personal services currently offered or new personal services that will be offered for facilities and/or special events?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

3 inspections

  1. Risk Management Inspection

    5 infractions

    • 03. Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?
      • No written procedures for skin cleansing prior to services, reprocessing sink decontamination and accidental cuts were available. Updated on January 6, 2026:The written procedure for sink decontamination is no longer required: a reprocessing sink located in the main service area near the hair services area was designated for tools reprocessing only.
    • 17. Is reusable equipment cleaned properly (Critical)?
      • The pedicure bath fans were visibly dirty and had debris - the pedicure bath was not cleaned and disinfected after each client. as required. The pedicure bath had internal plumbing for jets, and no liners were available.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • No approved disinfectant has been used/observed for esthetics tools disinfection. Approved high-level disinfectant is required.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • No records of testing of high-level disinfectant were available, and no testing of disinfectant has been conducted as required.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • No test strips were available to test the concentration of high-level disinfectant. Obtain the appropriate strips.
  2. Risk Management Inspection

    15 infractions

    • 03. Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?
      • No written procedures for skin cleansing prior to services, reprocessing sink decontamination and accidental cuts were available.
    • 08. Is hand hygiene performed by the personal services worker when required, in a proper manner and are provisions available to perform hand hygiene?
      • No paper towels or paper towels dispenser was observed in the pedicure room. No paper towels were available in the dispenser in the washroom.
    • 10. Is cleansing and antisepsis of skin and mucous membrane performed in accordance to written procedures and are suitable products being used?
      • No skin cleansing product was used/observed for skin cleansing prior to waxing/facials services.
    • 13. Is single-use or uncleanable equipment being used as intended (Critical)?
      • Single-use tools were being reused: wooden spatula was observed inside waxing pot. Ensure that single-use tools are discarded after each client.
    • 13. Is single-use or uncleanable equipment being used as intended (Critical)?
      • Sharp tools used for extractions during facials were reused. Ensure that all sharp tools used for extractions are discarded after one use.
    • 17. Is reusable equipment cleaned properly (Critical)?
      • The pedicure bath fans were visibly dirty and had debris - the pedicure bath was not cleaned and disinfected after each client. as required. The pedicure bath had internal plumbing for jets, and no liners were available.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • No approved disinfectant has been used/observed for esthetics tools disinfection. Approved high-level disinfectant is required.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • No soaking tray was available for disinfection of the re-usable metal esthetics tools. The semi-critical tools must be disinfected by soaking in a high-level disinfectant.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • No records of testing of high-level disinfectant were available, and no testing of disinfectant has been conducted as required.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • No test strips were available to test the concentration of high-level disinfectant. Obtain the appropriate strips.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • Preempt RTU observed in the waxing room was expired.
    • 25. Are the equipment manufacturer's instructions for use of specific equipment available and followed?
      • The H2O2 Small Bubble machine did not have manufacturer's instructions. Ensure that the manufacturer's instructions are available or discontinue use of the equipment.
    • 26. Are cosmetic products appropriate for their intended use and being handled properly?
      • Some cosmetic products did not have appropriate labels (e.g. labels missing, ingredients not listed or labels not in English/French). Ensure that all cosmetic products have appropriate labels.
    • 26. Are cosmetic products appropriate for their intended use and being handled properly?
      • Tinting products were used against manufacturer's instructions.
    • 29. Is the facility properly constructed and maintained to allow for the safe and sanitary provision of personal services (Non-Critical)?
      • The shelf in the hand sink vanity was water damaged/stained (pedicure chair plumbing was connected with hoses underneath the sink). Please repair or replace affected materials.
  3. Initial Inspection

    16 infractions

    • 02. Has the operator notified the RHA of the existence of a personal service business, including contact and location information, as well as all personal services currently offered or new personal services that will be offered for facilities and/or special events?
      • The owner of the personal service business did not submit a notification about the business to the Alberta Health Services. Submit the notification to AHS.
    • 03. Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?
      • No written procedures for skin cleansing prior to services, reprocessing sink decontamination and accidental cuts were available.
    • 08. Is hand hygiene performed by the personal services worker when required, in a proper manner and are provisions available to perform hand hygiene?
      • No paper towels or paper towels dispenser was observed in the pedicure room. No paper towels were available in the dispenser in the washroom.
    • 10. Is cleansing and antisepsis of skin and mucous membrane performed in accordance to written procedures and are suitable products being used?
      • No skin cleansing product was used/observed for skin cleansing prior to waxing/facials services.
    • 13. Is single-use or uncleanable equipment being used as intended (Critical)?
      • Sharp tools used for extractions during facials were reused. Ensure that all sharp tools used for extractions are discarded after one use.
    • 13. Is single-use or uncleanable equipment being used as intended (Critical)?
      • Single-use tools were being reused: wooden spatula was observed inside waxing pot. Ensure that single-use tools are discarded after each client.
    • 17. Is reusable equipment cleaned properly (Critical)?
      • The pedicure bath fans were visibly dirty and had debris - the pedicure bath was not cleaned and disinfected after each client. as required. The pedicure bath had internal plumbing for jets, and no liners were available.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • No soaking tray was available for disinfection of the re-usable metal esthetics tools. The semi-critical tools must be disinfected by soaking in a high-level disinfectant.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • No records of testing of high-level disinfectant were available, and no testing of disinfectant has been conducted as required.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • No test strips were available to test the concentration of high-level disinfectant. Obtain the appropriate strips.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • Preempt RTU observed in the waxing room was expired.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • No approved disinfectant has been used/observed for esthetics tools disinfection. Approved high-level disinfectant is required.
    • 25. Are the equipment manufacturer's instructions for use of specific equipment available and followed?
      • The H2O2 Small Bubble machine did not have manufacturer's instructions. Ensure that the manufacturer's instructions are available or discontinue use of the equipment.
    • 26. Are cosmetic products appropriate for their intended use and being handled properly?
      • Tinting products were used against manufacturer's instructions.
    • 26. Are cosmetic products appropriate for their intended use and being handled properly?
      • Some cosmetic products did not have appropriate labels (e.g. labels missing, ingredients not listed or labels not in English/French). Ensure that all cosmetic products have appropriate labels.
    • 29. Is the facility properly constructed and maintained to allow for the safe and sanitary provision of personal services (Non-Critical)?
      • The shelf in the hand sink vanity was water damaged/stained (pedicure chair plumbing was connected with hoses underneath the sink). Please repair or replace affected materials.

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website