Skip to content
Loading map…

Nammude Kada

4-158 Kennedy Rd S Brampton ON L6W 3G7 · Restaurant

Inspection summary

Nammude Kada has been inspected 7 times by Peel Public Health (Region of Peel) since October 18, 2024. The most recent inspection, on February 27, 2026, recorded 3 infractions.

2 of 7 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there was 1 inspection with 3 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Pests.

Recent inspections have recorded more infractions than earlier ones, so it is worth reading the latest reports closely.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their violations differently, so we group them by what they mean for food safety. Higher-risk findings are the ones inspectors treat as critical, because they can directly make someone sick.

  • PestsHigher risk

    Signs of mice, rats, cockroaches or flies, or gaps and clutter that let them get in or hide. Pests carry bacteria and can contaminate food and surfaces, so evidence of activity is treated seriously and usually triggers a follow-up visit.

    Recorded 2 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on October 15, 2025. For example: Did operator protect the premises against the entry of pests and maintain records of all pest control measures?

  • Building, plumbing and upkeepLower risk

    Floors, walls and ceilings must be smooth and clean, with working lighting, ventilation, plumbing, hot and cold water, and washrooms. These are rarely an immediate food-safety risk on their own, but persistent problems can lead to pest or sanitation issues.

    Recorded 5 times across 4 separate inspections, most recently on February 27, 2026. For example: Did operator provide a supply of potable hot and cold running water under pressure?

  • Equipment and utensilsLower risk

    Equipment has to be built from cleanable materials, kept in good repair and stored properly. These findings are mostly about upkeep, like a cracked shelf, a worn gasket or utensils stored the wrong way. They are generally lower risk but show how well the kitchen is maintained.

    Recorded 4 times across 4 separate inspections, most recently on February 27, 2026. For example: Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?

  • Other findingsLower risk

    Findings that do not fit the categories above, such as follow-ups that confirm an earlier violation was corrected, or requirements specific to this type of facility.

    Recorded once on February 27, 2026. For example: Did the operator process food in a manner that makes it safe to eat? (Significant risk)

About this data

These results come from Peel Public Health (Region of Peel), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

7 inspections

  1. Required

    3 infractions

    • Did the operator process food in a manner that makes it safe to eat? (Significant risk)
    • Did operator provide a supply of potable hot and cold running water under pressure?
    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
  2. Required

    3 infractions

    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
    • Did operator provide required supplies for every washroom?
    • Did operator protect the premises against the entry of pests and maintain records of all pest control measures?
  3. Follow-up

    0 infractions

  4. Required

    4 infractions

    • Did operator provide a supply of potable hot and cold running water under pressure?
    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
    • Did operator protect the premises against the entry of pests and maintain records of all pest control measures?
    • Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?
  5. Required

    1 infraction

    • Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?
  6. Follow-up

    0 infractions

  7. Required

    1 infraction

    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website