Skip to content
Loading map…

Paradise Chicken

E4-E5-5618 Tenth Line W Mississauga ON L5M 7L9 · Restaurant

Inspection summary

Paradise Chicken has been inspected 3 times by Peel Public Health (Region of Peel) since December 11, 2024. The most recent inspection, on November 10, 2025, recorded 1 infraction.

None of the 3 inspections on record were free of infractions. In the past 12 months there was 1 inspection with 1 infraction recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Food temperature control, Cleaning and sanitizing and Handwashing and staff hygiene.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their violations differently, so we group them by what they mean for food safety. Higher-risk findings are the ones inspectors treat as critical, because they can directly make someone sick.

  • Food temperature controlHigher risk

    Bacteria multiply fastest between about 4 °C and 60 °C (40 °F to 140 °F). Inspectors check that cold food stays cold, hot food stays hot, cooked food is cooled quickly, and that staff have accurate thermometers. Temperature problems are one of the most common causes of food poisoning, so these are treated as critical findings.

    Recorded 2 times on June 25, 2025. For example: Did operator keep potentially hazardous food out of the temperature danger zone, and provide adequately sized refrigeration and/or hot-holding equipment/space for the safe storage of such food? (Significant risk)

  • Cleaning and sanitizingHigher risk

    Anything that touches food, such as cutting boards, dishes and utensils, must be washed, rinsed and sanitized. Inspectors check dishwasher temperatures, sanitizer strength and how wiping cloths are stored. Poor sanitizing lets bacteria survive from one use to the next.

    Recorded once on June 25, 2025. For example: Did operator provide a test reagent to determine the concentration of sanitizer?

  • Handwashing and staff hygieneHigher risk

    Hands are the main way germs like norovirus move from people to food. Inspectors look for stocked, accessible handwashing sinks, staff washing hands when required, hair restraints, and sick employees being kept away from food. Gaps here can spread illness quickly.

    Recorded once on December 11, 2024. For example: Did operator provide the required supplies at each handwashing station?

  • Equipment and utensilsLower risk

    Equipment has to be built from cleanable materials, kept in good repair and stored properly. These findings are mostly about upkeep, like a cracked shelf, a worn gasket or utensils stored the wrong way. They are generally lower risk but show how well the kitchen is maintained.

    Recorded 2 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on November 10, 2025. For example: Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?

  • Building, plumbing and upkeepLower risk

    Floors, walls and ceilings must be smooth and clean, with working lighting, ventilation, plumbing, hot and cold water, and washrooms. These are rarely an immediate food-safety risk on their own, but persistent problems can lead to pest or sanitation issues.

    Recorded 2 times on June 25, 2025. For example: Did operator maintain the mechanical ventilation system to remove odours, fumes, vapours, smoke and excessive heat?

About this data

These results come from Peel Public Health (Region of Peel), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

3 inspections

  1. Required

    1 infraction

    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
  2. Required

    6 infractions

    • Did operator keep potentially hazardous food out of the temperature danger zone, and provide adequately sized refrigeration and/or hot-holding equipment/space for the safe storage of such food? (Significant risk)
    • Did operator provide and use accurate and easy-to-read thermometers?
    • Did operator provide a test reagent to determine the concentration of sanitizer?
    • Did operator maintain the mechanical ventilation system to remove odours, fumes, vapours, smoke and excessive heat?
    • Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?
    • Is at least one food handler/supervisor with valid food handler certification present on-site during every hour of operation?
  3. Required

    2 infractions

    • Did operator provide the required supplies at each handwashing station?
    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website