Skip to content
Loading map…

Popular Pizza

12-5380 Terry Fox Way Mississauga ON L5W 3A4 · Food Take Out

Official record from Peel Region →

Inspection summary

Popular Pizza has been inspected 8 times by Peel Public Health (Region of Peel) since October 17, 2024. The most recent inspection, on April 20, 2026, recorded 4 infractions.

None of the 8 inspections on record were free of infractions. In the past 12 months there were 2 inspections with 12 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Cleaning and sanitizing, Protecting food from contamination and Food temperature control.

Recent inspections have recorded more infractions than earlier ones, so it is worth reading the latest reports closely.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their violations differently, so we group them by what they mean for food safety. Higher-risk findings are the ones inspectors treat as critical, because they can directly make someone sick.

  • Cleaning and sanitizingHigher risk

    Anything that touches food, such as cutting boards, dishes and utensils, must be washed, rinsed and sanitized. Inspectors check dishwasher temperatures, sanitizer strength and how wiping cloths are stored. Poor sanitizing lets bacteria survive from one use to the next.

    Recorded 11 times across 6 separate inspections, most recently on April 20, 2026. For example: Did operator properly maintain food contact surfaces?

  • Protecting food from contaminationHigher risk

    This covers how food is stored, prepared and displayed: raw meat kept away from ready-to-eat food, food covered and stored off the floor, and nothing dripping or splashing into it. Cross-contamination from raw to cooked food is a direct route for salmonella and E. coli.

    Recorded 6 times across 5 separate inspections, most recently on April 20, 2026. For example: Did operator store food to prevent contamination and/or adulteration? (Significant Risk)

  • Food temperature controlHigher risk

    Bacteria multiply fastest between about 4 °C and 60 °C (40 °F to 140 °F). Inspectors check that cold food stays cold, hot food stays hot, cooked food is cooled quickly, and that staff have accurate thermometers. Temperature problems are one of the most common causes of food poisoning, so these are treated as critical findings.

    Recorded 3 times across 3 separate inspections, most recently on August 12, 2025. For example: Did operator keep potentially hazardous food out of the temperature danger zone, and provide adequately sized refrigeration and/or hot-holding equipment/space for the safe storage of such food? (Significant risk)

  • PestsHigher risk

    Signs of mice, rats, cockroaches or flies, or gaps and clutter that let them get in or hide. Pests carry bacteria and can contaminate food and surfaces, so evidence of activity is treated seriously and usually triggers a follow-up visit.

    Recorded 2 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on April 15, 2026. For example: Did operator protect the premises against the entry of pests and maintain records of all pest control measures?

  • Building, plumbing and upkeepLower risk

    Floors, walls and ceilings must be smooth and clean, with working lighting, ventilation, plumbing, hot and cold water, and washrooms. These are rarely an immediate food-safety risk on their own, but persistent problems can lead to pest or sanitation issues.

    Recorded 10 times across 4 separate inspections, most recently on April 20, 2026. For example: Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?

About this data

These results come from Peel Public Health (Region of Peel), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

8 inspections

  1. Follow-up

    4 infractions

    • Did operator store food to prevent contamination and/or adulteration? (Significant Risk)
    • Did operator properly maintain food contact surfaces?
    • Did operator provide a test reagent to determine the concentration of sanitizer?
    • Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?
  2. Required

    8 infractions

    • Did operator store food to prevent contamination and/or adulteration? (Significant Risk)
    • Did operator properly maintain food contact surfaces?
    • Did operator provide a test reagent to determine the concentration of sanitizer?
    • Did operator maintain and operate food premises in a sanitary manner? (Significant Risk)
    • Did operator maintain every washroom in a sanitary condition?
    • Did operator protect the premises against the entry of pests and maintain records of all pest control measures?
    • Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?
    • Did operator collect and remove garbage and waste including liquid waste to maintain the premises in a clean and sanitary condition?
  3. Follow-up

    2 infractions

    • Did operator properly maintain food contact surfaces?
    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
  4. Required

    10 infractions

    • Did operator keep potentially hazardous food out of the temperature danger zone, and provide adequately sized refrigeration and/or hot-holding equipment/space for the safe storage of such food? (Significant risk)
    • Did operator store food to prevent contamination and/or adulteration? (Significant Risk)
    • Did operator properly maintain food contact surfaces?
    • Did operator provide a supply of potable hot and cold running water under pressure?
    • Did operator properly wash and sanitize utensils?
    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
    • Did operator maintain every washroom in a sanitary condition?
    • Did operator provide required supplies for every washroom?
    • Did operator protect the premises against the entry of pests and maintain records of all pest control measures?
    • Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?
  5. Follow-up

    1 infraction

    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
  6. Required

    5 infractions

    • Did operator provide and use accurate and easy-to-read thermometers?
    • Did operator store food to prevent contamination and/or adulteration? (Significant Risk)
    • Did operator provide a supply of potable hot and cold running water under pressure?
    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
    • Did operator maintain every washroom in a sanitary condition?
  7. Follow-up

    2 infractions

    • Did operator properly maintain food contact surfaces?
    • Is at least one food handler/supervisor with valid food handler certification present on-site during every hour of operation?
  8. Required

    7 infractions

    • Did operator keep potentially hazardous food out of the temperature danger zone, and provide adequately sized refrigeration and/or hot-holding equipment/space for the safe storage of such food? (Significant risk)
    • Did operator store food to prevent contamination and/or adulteration? (Significant Risk)
    • Did operator properly maintain food contact surfaces?
    • Did operator provide a test reagent to determine the concentration of sanitizer?
    • Did operator properly wash and sanitize utensils?
    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
    • Is at least one food handler/supervisor with valid food handler certification present on-site during every hour of operation?

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website