Skip to content
Loading map…

Premium Sweets & Desserts Inc

15-17-7025 Tomken Rd Mississauga ON L5S 1R6 · Food Take Out

Inspection summary

Premium Sweets & Desserts Inc has been inspected 5 times by Peel Public Health (Region of Peel) since April 23, 2025. The most recent inspection, on May 27, 2026, found no infractions.

2 of 5 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 2 inspections with 5 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Pests and Food temperature control.

Recent inspections have recorded more infractions than earlier ones, so it is worth reading the latest reports closely.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their violations differently, so we group them by what they mean for food safety. Higher-risk findings are the ones inspectors treat as critical, because they can directly make someone sick.

  • PestsHigher risk

    Signs of mice, rats, cockroaches or flies, or gaps and clutter that let them get in or hide. Pests carry bacteria and can contaminate food and surfaces, so evidence of activity is treated seriously and usually triggers a follow-up visit.

    Recorded once on June 4, 2025. For example: Did operator take adequate measures to maintain food premises in a condition that prevent harbourage or breeding of pests? (Significant Risk)

  • Food temperature controlHigher risk

    Bacteria multiply fastest between about 4 °C and 60 °C (40 °F to 140 °F). Inspectors check that cold food stays cold, hot food stays hot, cooked food is cooled quickly, and that staff have accurate thermometers. Temperature problems are one of the most common causes of food poisoning, so these are treated as critical findings.

    Recorded once on April 23, 2025. For example: Did operator keep potentially hazardous food out of the temperature danger zone, and provide adequately sized refrigeration and/or hot-holding equipment/space for the safe storage of such food? (Significant risk)

  • Building, plumbing and upkeepLower risk

    Floors, walls and ceilings must be smooth and clean, with working lighting, ventilation, plumbing, hot and cold water, and washrooms. These are rarely an immediate food-safety risk on their own, but persistent problems can lead to pest or sanitation issues.

    Recorded 3 times on May 26, 2026. For example: Did operator provide a supply of potable hot and cold running water under pressure?

  • Food safety training and certificationLower risk

    Most jurisdictions require a certified food handler or manager on site, and some require allergen or food-worker training. These findings mean the paperwork or the trained person was missing at the time. They do not by themselves mean food was handled unsafely.

    Recorded 2 times on May 26, 2026. For example: Did operator provide an adequate number of handwashing stations that are conveniently accessible to food handlers?

  • Equipment and utensilsLower risk

    Equipment has to be built from cleanable materials, kept in good repair and stored properly. These findings are mostly about upkeep, like a cracked shelf, a worn gasket or utensils stored the wrong way. They are generally lower risk but show how well the kitchen is maintained.

    Recorded once on June 4, 2025. For example: Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?

About this data

These results come from Peel Public Health (Region of Peel), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

5 inspections

  1. Follow-up

    0 infractions

  2. Required

    5 infractions

    • Did operator provide a supply of potable hot and cold running water under pressure?
    • Did operator provide an adequate number of handwashing stations that are conveniently accessible to food handlers?
    • Did food handler(s) wash hands to prevent contamination of food and/or food contact surfaces? (Significant Risk)
    • Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?
    • Did operator maintain and operate food premises free from any condition that is a health hazard?
  3. Required

    0 infractions

  4. Complaint

    2 infractions

    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
    • Did operator take adequate measures to maintain food premises in a condition that prevent harbourage or breeding of pests? (Significant Risk)
  5. Required

    1 infraction

    • Did operator keep potentially hazardous food out of the temperature danger zone, and provide adequately sized refrigeration and/or hot-holding equipment/space for the safe storage of such food? (Significant risk)

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website