Skip to content
Loading map…

Shy Lounge

13-5 McMurchy Ave N Brampton ON L6X 2R6 · Restaurant

Inspection summary

Shy Lounge has been inspected 4 times by Peel Public Health (Region of Peel) since November 14, 2024. The most recent inspection, on August 21, 2026, recorded 4 infractions.

None of the 4 inspections on record were free of infractions. In the past 12 months there were 2 inspections with 8 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Cleaning and sanitizing, Pests and Handwashing and staff hygiene.

Recent inspections have recorded fewer infractions than earlier ones, so the record is improving.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their violations differently, so we group them by what they mean for food safety. Higher-risk findings are the ones inspectors treat as critical, because they can directly make someone sick.

  • Cleaning and sanitizingHigher risk

    Anything that touches food, such as cutting boards, dishes and utensils, must be washed, rinsed and sanitized. Inspectors check dishwasher temperatures, sanitizer strength and how wiping cloths are stored. Poor sanitizing lets bacteria survive from one use to the next.

    Recorded 7 times across 4 separate inspections, most recently on August 21, 2026. For example: Did operator provide a test reagent to determine the concentration of sanitizer?

  • PestsHigher risk

    Signs of mice, rats, cockroaches or flies, or gaps and clutter that let them get in or hide. Pests carry bacteria and can contaminate food and surfaces, so evidence of activity is treated seriously and usually triggers a follow-up visit.

    Recorded 3 times across 3 separate inspections, most recently on November 18, 2025. For example: Did operator protect the premises against the entry of pests and maintain records of all pest control measures?

  • Handwashing and staff hygieneHigher risk

    Hands are the main way germs like norovirus move from people to food. Inspectors look for stocked, accessible handwashing sinks, staff washing hands when required, hair restraints, and sick employees being kept away from food. Gaps here can spread illness quickly.

    Recorded 2 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on November 18, 2025. For example: Did operator provide the required supplies at each handwashing station?

  • Food temperature controlHigher risk

    Bacteria multiply fastest between about 4 °C and 60 °C (40 °F to 140 °F). Inspectors check that cold food stays cold, hot food stays hot, cooked food is cooled quickly, and that staff have accurate thermometers. Temperature problems are one of the most common causes of food poisoning, so these are treated as critical findings.

    Recorded once on August 21, 2026. For example: Did operator keep potentially hazardous food out of the temperature danger zone, and provide adequately sized refrigeration and/or hot-holding equipment/space for the safe storage of such food? (Significant risk)

  • Building, plumbing and upkeepLower risk

    Floors, walls and ceilings must be smooth and clean, with working lighting, ventilation, plumbing, hot and cold water, and washrooms. These are rarely an immediate food-safety risk on their own, but persistent problems can lead to pest or sanitation issues.

    Recorded 3 times across 3 separate inspections, most recently on August 21, 2026. For example: Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?

About this data

These results come from Peel Public Health (Region of Peel), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

4 inspections

  1. Required

    4 infractions

    • Did operator keep potentially hazardous food out of the temperature danger zone, and provide adequately sized refrigeration and/or hot-holding equipment/space for the safe storage of such food? (Significant risk)
    • Did operator provide a test reagent to determine the concentration of sanitizer?
    • Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?
    • Is at least one food handler/supervisor with valid food handler certification present on-site during every hour of operation?
  2. Required

    4 infractions

    • Did operator provide the required supplies at each handwashing station?
    • Did operator provide a test reagent to determine the concentration of sanitizer?
    • Did operator protect the premises against the entry of pests and maintain records of all pest control measures?
    • Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?
  3. Required

    6 infractions

    • Did operator properly maintain food contact surfaces?
    • Did operator provide the required supplies at each handwashing station?
    • Did operator provide a test reagent to determine the concentration of sanitizer?
    • Did operator protect the premises against the entry of pests and maintain records of all pest control measures?
    • Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?
    • Is at least one food handler/supervisor with valid food handler certification present on-site during every hour of operation?
  4. Required

    5 infractions

    • Did operator properly maintain food contact surfaces?
    • Did operator provide a test reagent to determine the concentration of sanitizer?
    • Did operator properly wash and sanitize utensils?
    • Did operator protect the premises against the entry of pests and maintain records of all pest control measures?
    • Is at least one food handler/supervisor with valid food handler certification present on-site during every hour of operation?

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website