Skip to content
Loading map…

Sushi in Sushi

5-2310 Battleford Rd Mississauga ON L5N 3K6 · Restaurant

Official record from Peel Region →

Inspection summary

Sushi in Sushi has been inspected 6 times by Peel Public Health (Region of Peel) since November 29, 2024. The most recent inspection, on August 27, 2026, recorded 2 infractions.

1 of 6 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 3 inspections with 5 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Pests, Cleaning and sanitizing and Handwashing and staff hygiene.

Recent inspections have recorded fewer infractions than earlier ones, so the record is improving.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their violations differently, so we group them by what they mean for food safety. Higher-risk findings are the ones inspectors treat as critical, because they can directly make someone sick.

  • PestsHigher risk

    Signs of mice, rats, cockroaches or flies, or gaps and clutter that let them get in or hide. Pests carry bacteria and can contaminate food and surfaces, so evidence of activity is treated seriously and usually triggers a follow-up visit.

    Recorded 3 times across 3 separate inspections, most recently on November 24, 2025. For example: Did operator take adequate measures to maintain food premises in a condition that prevent harbourage or breeding of pests? (Significant Risk)

  • Cleaning and sanitizingHigher risk

    Anything that touches food, such as cutting boards, dishes and utensils, must be washed, rinsed and sanitized. Inspectors check dishwasher temperatures, sanitizer strength and how wiping cloths are stored. Poor sanitizing lets bacteria survive from one use to the next.

    Recorded 2 times on November 29, 2024. For example: Did operator properly maintain food contact surfaces?

  • Handwashing and staff hygieneHigher risk

    Hands are the main way germs like norovirus move from people to food. Inspectors look for stocked, accessible handwashing sinks, staff washing hands when required, hair restraints, and sick employees being kept away from food. Gaps here can spread illness quickly.

    Recorded once on November 24, 2025. For example: Did operator provide the required supplies at each handwashing station?

  • Protecting food from contaminationHigher risk

    This covers how food is stored, prepared and displayed: raw meat kept away from ready-to-eat food, food covered and stored off the floor, and nothing dripping or splashing into it. Cross-contamination from raw to cooked food is a direct route for salmonella and E. coli.

    Recorded once on November 29, 2024. For example: Did operator store food to prevent contamination and/or adulteration? (Significant Risk)

  • Equipment and utensilsLower risk

    Equipment has to be built from cleanable materials, kept in good repair and stored properly. These findings are mostly about upkeep, like a cracked shelf, a worn gasket or utensils stored the wrong way. They are generally lower risk but show how well the kitchen is maintained.

    Recorded 5 times across 5 separate inspections, most recently on August 27, 2026. For example: Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?

About this data

These results come from Peel Public Health (Region of Peel), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

6 inspections

  1. Required

    2 infractions

    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
    • Did operator maintain the mechanical ventilation system to remove odours, fumes, vapours, smoke and excessive heat?
  2. Required

    0 infractions

  3. Required

    3 infractions

    • Did operator provide the required supplies at each handwashing station?
    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
    • Did operator take adequate measures to maintain food premises in a condition that prevent harbourage or breeding of pests? (Significant Risk)
  4. Required

    2 infractions

    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
    • Did operator take adequate measures to maintain food premises in a condition that prevent harbourage or breeding of pests? (Significant Risk)
  5. Required

    3 infractions

    • Did operator provide an adequate number of handwashing stations that are conveniently accessible to food handlers?
    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
    • Did operator take adequate measures to maintain food premises in a condition that prevent harbourage or breeding of pests? (Significant Risk)
  6. Required

    5 infractions

    • Did operator store food to prevent contamination and/or adulteration? (Significant Risk)
    • Did operator properly maintain food contact surfaces?
    • Did operator provide a test reagent to determine the concentration of sanitizer?
    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
    • Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website