Skip to content
Loading map…

Villa Carital - Long Term Care

3050 Penticton St, Vancouver BC V5M 4W2 · Long Term Care

Official record from Vancouver Coastal →

Inspection summary

Villa Carital - Long Term Care has been inspected 6 times by Vancouver Coastal Health since January 25, 2022. The most recent inspection, on June 5, 2026, recorded 1 infraction.

1 of 6 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 2 inspections with 4 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Chemicals and toxic substances.

The number of infractions per inspection has stayed roughly the same over time.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for the people in care. Higher-risk findings are the ones that could directly make someone sick, and they matter more here because young children, older adults and people who are unwell are more vulnerable to infection.

  • Chemicals and toxic substancesHigher risk

    Cleaning products, disinfectants and pesticides must be labelled and stored safely, away from food and from surfaces people touch. Inspectors flag chemicals that could contaminate food or harm people, as well as pest treatments applied without proper supervision.

    Recorded 2 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on June 5, 2026. For example: There are secure, safe and adequate storage areas for cleaning agents, chemical products and other hazardous materials [RCR Sec 35 (1)(c)]

  • Permits, records and postingLower risk

    Operating permits, required signage, written procedures and logs. These findings are administrative: the documentation was missing or out of date at the time of inspection.

    Recorded 11 times across 4 separate inspections, most recently on November 18, 2025. For example: Reportable incidents have been reported with appropriate notifications [RCR Sec 77(2)(a)(b)(d);DOLSOP Preventing Opioid Overdose]

  • Food safety training and certificationLower risk

    Many jurisdictions require a trained or certified person on site, such as a certified food handler. These findings mean the training record or the trained person was missing at the time. They do not by themselves mean anything was handled unsafely.

    Recorded once on October 23, 2023. For example: If a person in care is restrained, the information required by the regulation is recorded in the care plan of the person in care [RCR Sec 84]

  • Other findingsLower risk

    Findings that do not fit the categories above, such as follow-ups that confirm an earlier violation was corrected, or requirements specific to this type of facility.

    Recorded once on November 18, 2025. For example: A restraint used under section 74(1)(b) that continues either continuously or intermittently for more than 24 hours is reassessed within the specified time consulting with those who agreed to the use of the restraint [RCR Sec 75(3)]

About this data

These results come from Vancouver Coastal Health, which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

6 inspections

  1. Routine Follow-up

    1 infraction

    • There are secure, safe and adequate storage areas for cleaning agents, chemical products and other hazardous materials [RCR Sec 35 (1)(c)]
  2. Routine

    3 infractions

    • A restraint used under section 74(1)(b) that continues either continuously or intermittently for more than 24 hours is reassessed within the specified time consulting with those who agreed to the use of the restraint [RCR Sec 75(3)]
      • The restraint has not been reassessed in the time specified by the persons who agreed.
    • Reportable incidents have been reported with appropriate notifications [RCR Sec 77(2)(a)(b)(d);DOLSOP Preventing Opioid Overdose]
      • Did not inform the medical health officer.
    • There are secure, safe and adequate storage areas for cleaning agents, chemical products and other hazardous materials [RCR Sec 35 (1)(c)]
  3. Routine

    4 infractions

    • The written policies and procedures are reviewed and revised if necessary at least once each year [RCR Sec 85(1)(b)]
    • The facility has written policies and procedures as prescribed by the regulation [RCR Sec 85(2)(b-l)]
      • There is no written policy and procedure on the orientation of new managers and employees, including orientation respecting the policies and procedures of the community care facility, the regulations and the Act.
      • There is no written policy and procedure regarding release of vulnerable adults from the community care facility if a person who is not authorized to remove the person in care from the community care facility requests the release of the person in care.
      • There is no written policy and procedure regarding release of vulnerable adults from the community care facility, including if a person who is authorized to remove the person in care from the community care facility appears to be incapable of providing safe care to the person in care.
      • There is no written policy and procedure for responding to reportable incidents.
    • A record is kept of unexpected events involving persons in care [RCR Sec 88 (b)]
    • The nutrition plan is reviewed by a dietician if requested or required by the health professional providing care, the medical health officer or the funding program. [RCR Sec 83(3)(c)]
  4. Routine

    3 infractions

    • The facility has a written a policy and procedure for obtaining consent, in accordance with Part 3 of the Health Care (Consent) and Care Facility (Admission) Act, before admitting an adult to the community care facility. [RCR Sec 85(2)(m)]
    • There is a record of any assessment of incapability report provided under section 22 (1) (c) of the Health Care Consent Regulation. [RCR Sec 77.1(1)(c)]
    • If a person in care is restrained, the information required by the regulation is recorded in the care plan of the person in care [RCR Sec 84]
      • The reason for the use of the restraint is not recorded.
      • The result of any reassessment of the use of the restraint is not recorded.
      • The alternatives that were considered to the use of the restraint, and which, if any, were implemented or rejected is not recorded.
      • The type or nature of the restraint used is not recorded.
      • Employee compliance with the requirements of Division 5 [Use of Restraints] of Part 5 is not recorded.
      • The duration of the restraint and the monitoring of the person in care during the restraint are not recorded.
  5. Routine Follow-up

    0 infractions

  6. Routine

    4 infractions

    • The facility has written policies and procedures as prescribed by the regulation [RCR Sec 85(2)(b-l)]
      • There is no written policy and procedure on the appropriate manner and schedule of record keeping.
    • Reportable incidents have been reported to the Medical Health Officer in the form and manner required. [RCR Sec 77(2)(c)]
    • Reportable incidents have been reported with appropriate notifications [RCR Sec 77(2)(a)(b)(d);DOLSOP Preventing Opioid Overdose]
      • Did not inform the medical health officer.
    • A record is kept of reportable incidents involving persons in care [RCR Sec 88 (c)]

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website