Skip to content
Loading map…

Vinayagar Villas

31-85 Kennedy Rd S Brampton ON L6W 3G1 · Food Take Out

Inspection summary

Vinayagar Villas has been inspected 6 times by Peel Public Health (Region of Peel) since October 29, 2024. The most recent inspection, on March 24, 2026, recorded 4 infractions.

2 of 6 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there was 1 inspection with 4 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Food temperature control and Pests.

Recent inspections have recorded more infractions than earlier ones, so it is worth reading the latest reports closely.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their violations differently, so we group them by what they mean for food safety. Higher-risk findings are the ones inspectors treat as critical, because they can directly make someone sick.

  • Food temperature controlHigher risk

    Bacteria multiply fastest between about 4 °C and 60 °C (40 °F to 140 °F). Inspectors check that cold food stays cold, hot food stays hot, cooked food is cooled quickly, and that staff have accurate thermometers. Temperature problems are one of the most common causes of food poisoning, so these are treated as critical findings.

    Recorded 6 times across 4 separate inspections, most recently on March 24, 2026. For example: Did operator keep potentially hazardous food out of the temperature danger zone, and provide adequately sized refrigeration and/or hot-holding equipment/space for the safe storage of such food? (Significant risk)

  • PestsHigher risk

    Signs of mice, rats, cockroaches or flies, or gaps and clutter that let them get in or hide. Pests carry bacteria and can contaminate food and surfaces, so evidence of activity is treated seriously and usually triggers a follow-up visit.

    Recorded 2 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on March 24, 2026. For example: Did operator protect the premises against the entry of pests and maintain records of all pest control measures?

  • Food safety training and certificationLower risk

    Most jurisdictions require a certified food handler or manager on site, and some require allergen or food-worker training. These findings mean the paperwork or the trained person was missing at the time. They do not by themselves mean food was handled unsafely.

    Recorded once on March 24, 2026. For example: Is at least one food handler/supervisor with valid food handler certification present on-site during every hour of operation?

  • Equipment and utensilsLower risk

    Equipment has to be built from cleanable materials, kept in good repair and stored properly. These findings are mostly about upkeep, like a cracked shelf, a worn gasket or utensils stored the wrong way. They are generally lower risk but show how well the kitchen is maintained.

    Recorded once on September 17, 2025. For example: Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?

About this data

These results come from Peel Public Health (Region of Peel), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

6 inspections

  1. Required

    4 infractions

    • Did operator keep potentially hazardous food out of the temperature danger zone, and provide adequately sized refrigeration and/or hot-holding equipment/space for the safe storage of such food? (Significant risk)
    • Did operator provide and use accurate and easy-to-read thermometers?
    • Did operator protect the premises against the entry of pests and maintain records of all pest control measures?
    • Is at least one food handler/supervisor with valid food handler certification present on-site during every hour of operation?
  2. Required

    3 infractions

    • Did operator keep potentially hazardous food out of the temperature danger zone, and provide adequately sized refrigeration and/or hot-holding equipment/space for the safe storage of such food? (Significant risk)
    • Did operator provide and use accurate and easy-to-read thermometers?
    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
  3. Required

    0 infractions

  4. Follow-up

    0 infractions

  5. Complaint

    1 infraction

    • Did operator keep potentially hazardous food out of the temperature danger zone, and provide adequately sized refrigeration and/or hot-holding equipment/space for the safe storage of such food? (Significant risk)
  6. Complaint

    2 infractions

    • Did operator keep potentially hazardous food out of the temperature danger zone, and provide adequately sized refrigeration and/or hot-holding equipment/space for the safe storage of such food? (Critical Risk)
    • Did operator take adequate measures to maintain food premises in a condition that prevent harbourage or breeding of pests? (Critical Risk)

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website