Skip to content
Loading map…

10711 47 Avenue NW - Whirlpool

10711 47 Avenue NW Edmonton AB T6H 5J1 · Aquatic Facility

16 inspections

  1. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Total alkalinity was 20 ppm. Ensure that total alkalinity is maintained between 60 and 180 ppm.
  2. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Total alkalinity was 20 ppm. Ensure that total alkalinity is maintained between 60 and 180 ppm.
  3. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Total alkalinity was 20 ppm. Ensure that total alkalinity is maintained between 60 and 180 ppm.
  4. Monitoring Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Total alkalinity was 20 ppm. Ensure that total alkalinity is maintained between 60 and 180 ppm.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Rate of filtration was 12.86 gpm/sq ft (with the flow rate about 63 gpm and filter area 4.9 ft2). It was lowered to 12.24 gpm/sq ft during the inspection (flow rate was lowered from 63 gpm to 60 gpm). Ensure that the rate of filtration for hot tub does not exceed 12.5 gpm/sq ft.
    • 18. Have plans for construction, renovations or alteration for the pool been submitted for written approval?
      • The cartridge filter was replaced with a high-rate sand filter, and no notification about the replacement was submitted to EPH-AHS. The information was submitted during the inspection: The high-rate sand filter, Hayward S310T2, SA 4.9ft2.
  5. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  6. Risk Management Inspection

    4 infractions

    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Total alkalinity was 24 ppm. Ensure that total alkalinity is maintained between 60 and 180 ppm.
    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Combined chlorine was 1.64 ppm. Ensure that the combined chlorine residual is maintained at the lowest level possible and below 1 ppm.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • The turnover period was 19.8 minutes based on a volume of 792 gallons and flow rate 40 gpm. Ensure that the turnover period is 15 minutes or less. Note: flow rate was 60 gpm during the previous inspection.
    • 12. Are the general safety devices and physical conditions in this pool providing a safe environment (Critical)?
      • One of the main drain outlets (frame for Waterway 640-1320V cover) was cracked. Replace the damaged part of the mail drain outlet.
  7. Monitoring Inspection

    5 infractions

    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Combined chlorine was 1.64 ppm. Ensure that the combined chlorine residual is maintained at the lowest level possible and below 1 ppm.
    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Total alkalinity was 24 ppm. Ensure that total alkalinity is maintained between 60 and 180 ppm.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • The turnover period was 19.8 minutes based on a volume of 792 gallons and flow rate 40 gpm. Ensure that the turnover period is 15 minutes or less. Note: flow rate was 60 gpm during the previous inspection.
    • 12. Are the general safety devices and physical conditions in this pool providing a safe environment (Critical)?
      • One of the main drain outlets (frame for Waterway 640-1320V cover) was cracked. Replace the damaged part of the mail drain outlet.
    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • An updated anti-entrapment compliance plan assessing the entrapment risks must be developed and available for review. Develop a new anti-entrapment compliance plan reflecting the updated equipment and submit the plan for review to Environmental Public Health.
  8. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  9. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • the sample 25EN-059E00149 submitted on February 28, 2025, was unsatisfactory: HPC 160. Previous sample result was satisfactory.
  10. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • The sample 25EN-031E00069 submitted on January 31, 2025, was unsatisfactory: Pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated.
  11. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  12. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • the sample 24EN-151E00563 submitted on May 30, 2024, was unsatisfactory: Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated.
  13. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • the sample WE-24-0008899 submitted on January 25, 2024, was unsatisfactory: HPC 780.
  14. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  15. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  16. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • the sample WE-23-0123574 submitted on November 17, 2023, was unsatisfactory: Pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated