Skip to content
Loading map…

10711 47 Avenue NW - Whirlpool

10711 47 Avenue NW Edmonton AB T6H 5J1 · Aquatic Facility

Official record from Alberta →

Inspection summary

10711 47 Avenue NW - Whirlpool has been inspected 17 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since November 20, 2023. The most recent inspection, on July 22, 2026, found no infractions.

6 of 17 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 5 inspections with 6 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Pool and spa water quality and Chemicals and toxic substances.

Recent inspections have recorded more infractions than earlier ones, so it is worth reading the latest reports closely.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for the people using the facility. Higher-risk findings are the ones that could directly cause illness or injury, such as water that is not properly treated.

  • Pool and spa water qualityHigher risk

    For pools, spas and splash pads, inspectors test disinfectant levels, pH and water clarity, and check safety equipment. Water that is not properly treated can spread skin, ear and stomach infections.

    Recorded 11 times across 8 separate inspections, most recently on June 5, 2026. For example: Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?

  • Chemicals and toxic substancesHigher risk

    Pool chemicals such as chlorine and acid must be labelled, stored apart from each other and handled safely. Mixing them by mistake can release toxic gas, so storage and handling problems are treated seriously.

    Recorded 8 times across 6 separate inspections, most recently on June 23, 2026. For example: Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?

  • Food safety training and certificationLower risk

    Many jurisdictions require trained pool operators and certified lifeguards. These findings mean required training, certification or staffing records were missing at the time of inspection.

    Recorded once on April 8, 2025. For example: Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

17 inspections

  1. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  2. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Total alkalinity was 20 ppm. Ensure that total alkalinity is maintained between 60 and 180 ppm.
  3. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Total alkalinity was 20 ppm. Ensure that total alkalinity is maintained between 60 and 180 ppm.
  4. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Total alkalinity was 20 ppm. Ensure that total alkalinity is maintained between 60 and 180 ppm.
  5. Monitoring Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Total alkalinity was 20 ppm. Ensure that total alkalinity is maintained between 60 and 180 ppm.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Rate of filtration was 12.86 gpm/sq ft (with the flow rate about 63 gpm and filter area 4.9 ft2). It was lowered to 12.24 gpm/sq ft during the inspection (flow rate was lowered from 63 gpm to 60 gpm). Ensure that the rate of filtration for hot tub does not exceed 12.5 gpm/sq ft.
    • 18. Have plans for construction, renovations or alteration for the pool been submitted for written approval?
      • The cartridge filter was replaced with a high-rate sand filter, and no notification about the replacement was submitted to EPH-AHS. The information was submitted during the inspection: The high-rate sand filter, Hayward S310T2, SA 4.9ft2.
  6. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  7. Risk Management Inspection

    4 infractions

    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Total alkalinity was 24 ppm. Ensure that total alkalinity is maintained between 60 and 180 ppm.
    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Combined chlorine was 1.64 ppm. Ensure that the combined chlorine residual is maintained at the lowest level possible and below 1 ppm.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • The turnover period was 19.8 minutes based on a volume of 792 gallons and flow rate 40 gpm. Ensure that the turnover period is 15 minutes or less. Note: flow rate was 60 gpm during the previous inspection.
    • 12. Are the general safety devices and physical conditions in this pool providing a safe environment (Critical)?
      • One of the main drain outlets (frame for Waterway 640-1320V cover) was cracked. Replace the damaged part of the mail drain outlet.
  8. Monitoring Inspection

    5 infractions

    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Combined chlorine was 1.64 ppm. Ensure that the combined chlorine residual is maintained at the lowest level possible and below 1 ppm.
    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Total alkalinity was 24 ppm. Ensure that total alkalinity is maintained between 60 and 180 ppm.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • The turnover period was 19.8 minutes based on a volume of 792 gallons and flow rate 40 gpm. Ensure that the turnover period is 15 minutes or less. Note: flow rate was 60 gpm during the previous inspection.
    • 12. Are the general safety devices and physical conditions in this pool providing a safe environment (Critical)?
      • One of the main drain outlets (frame for Waterway 640-1320V cover) was cracked. Replace the damaged part of the mail drain outlet.
    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • An updated anti-entrapment compliance plan assessing the entrapment risks must be developed and available for review. Develop a new anti-entrapment compliance plan reflecting the updated equipment and submit the plan for review to Environmental Public Health.
  9. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  10. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • the sample 25EN-059E00149 submitted on February 28, 2025, was unsatisfactory: HPC 160. Previous sample result was satisfactory.
  11. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • The sample 25EN-031E00069 submitted on January 31, 2025, was unsatisfactory: Pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated.
  12. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  13. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • the sample 24EN-151E00563 submitted on May 30, 2024, was unsatisfactory: Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated.
  14. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • the sample WE-24-0008899 submitted on January 25, 2024, was unsatisfactory: HPC 780.
  15. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  16. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  17. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • the sample WE-23-0123574 submitted on November 17, 2023, was unsatisfactory: Pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website