2911 109 Street NW - Whirlpool
2911 109 Street NW Edmonton AB T6J 5C9 · Aquatic Facility
9 inspections
- Risk Management Inspection
1 infraction
- 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
- There was a discrepancy between the manual pH 7.52/7.67 and the automated controller pH 7.3. Please clean, calibrate and/or replace the probe.
- 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
- Demand Inspection
2 infractions
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- the sample 25EN-199E00076 submitted on July 18, 2025, was unsatisfactory: HPC 110.
- 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
- There was a discrepancy between the manual pH 7.52/7.67 and the automated controller pH 7.3. Please clean, calibrate and/or replace the probe.
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Monitoring Inspection
1 infraction
- 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
- There was a discrepancy between the manual pH 7.52/7.67 and the automated controller pH 7.3. Please clean, calibrate and/or replace the probe.
- 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
- Risk Management Inspection
0 infractions
- Demand Inspection
2 infractions
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- the sample WE-24-0042602 submitted on May 3, 2024, was unsatisfactory: Pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated.
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- the sample EN24-145E00283 submitted on May 24, 2024, was unsatisfactory: HPC 130.
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Demand Inspection
1 infraction
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- the sample WE-24-0042602 submitted on May 3, 2024, was unsatisfactory: Pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated.
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Risk Management Inspection
0 infractions
- Monitoring Inspection
1 infraction
- 10. Are general nuisance conditions, other than those noted in other violations, being prevented at this pool (Non-Critical)?
- Vacless unit installed on the jet pump was not operating properly: worked properly when closing the valve(s) but could not be easily reset. The manufacturer was contacted by the service provider for the follow-up. Updated on April 16, 2024: The Vacless (secondary anti-entrapment device) was tested but no record was available.
- 10. Are general nuisance conditions, other than those noted in other violations, being prevented at this pool (Non-Critical)?
- Risk Management Inspection
1 infraction
- 10. Are general nuisance conditions, other than those noted in other violations, being prevented at this pool (Non-Critical)?
- Vacless unit installed on the jet pump was not operating properly: worked properly when closing the valve(s) but could not be easily reset. The manufacturer was contacted by the service provider for the follow-up.
- 10. Are general nuisance conditions, other than those noted in other violations, being prevented at this pool (Non-Critical)?