Skip to content
Loading map…

Broast Inn

77 Dundas St W Mississauga ON L5B 1H7 · Restaurant

Official record from Peel Region →

Inspection summary

Broast Inn has been inspected 3 times by Peel Public Health (Region of Peel) since March 27, 2025. The most recent inspection, on May 12, 2026, recorded 3 infractions.

None of the 3 inspections on record were free of infractions. In the past 12 months there were 2 inspections with 5 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Pests.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their violations differently, so we group them by what they mean for food safety. Higher-risk findings are the ones inspectors treat as critical, because they can directly make someone sick.

  • PestsHigher risk

    Signs of mice, rats, cockroaches or flies, or gaps and clutter that let them get in or hide. Pests carry bacteria and can contaminate food and surfaces, so evidence of activity is treated seriously and usually triggers a follow-up visit.

    Recorded once on October 28, 2025. For example: Did operator take adequate measures to maintain food premises in a condition that prevent harbourage or breeding of pests? (Significant Risk)

  • Equipment and utensilsLower risk

    Equipment has to be built from cleanable materials, kept in good repair and stored properly. These findings are mostly about upkeep, like a cracked shelf, a worn gasket or utensils stored the wrong way. They are generally lower risk but show how well the kitchen is maintained.

    Recorded 3 times across 3 separate inspections, most recently on May 12, 2026. For example: Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?

  • Building, plumbing and upkeepLower risk

    Floors, walls and ceilings must be smooth and clean, with working lighting, ventilation, plumbing, hot and cold water, and washrooms. These are rarely an immediate food-safety risk on their own, but persistent problems can lead to pest or sanitation issues.

    Recorded 2 times on May 12, 2026. For example: Did operator maintain every washroom in a sanitary condition?

  • Food safety training and certificationLower risk

    Most jurisdictions require a certified food handler or manager on site, and some require allergen or food-worker training. These findings mean the paperwork or the trained person was missing at the time. They do not by themselves mean food was handled unsafely.

    Recorded once on March 27, 2025. For example: Is at least one food handler/supervisor with valid food handler certification present on-site during every hour of operation?

About this data

These results come from Peel Public Health (Region of Peel), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

3 inspections

  1. Required

    3 infractions

    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
    • Did operator maintain every washroom in a sanitary condition?
    • Did operator provide required supplies for every washroom?
  2. Required

    2 infractions

    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
    • Did operator take adequate measures to maintain food premises in a condition that prevent harbourage or breeding of pests? (Significant Risk)
  3. Required

    2 infractions

    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
    • Is at least one food handler/supervisor with valid food handler certification present on-site during every hour of operation?

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website