Skip to content
Loading map…

Chateau Jasper - Whirlpool

96 Geikie Street Jasper AB T0E 1E0 · Aquatic Facility

Official record from Alberta →

Inspection summary

Chateau Jasper - Whirlpool has been inspected 26 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since October 23, 2023. The most recent inspection, on March 16, 2026, found no infractions.

8 of 26 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 9 inspections with 6 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Pool and spa water quality, Food temperature control and Chemicals and toxic substances.

The number of infractions per inspection has stayed roughly the same over time.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for the people using the facility. Higher-risk findings are the ones that could directly cause illness or injury, such as water that is not properly treated.

  • Pool and spa water qualityHigher risk

    For pools, spas and splash pads, inspectors test disinfectant levels, pH and water clarity, and check safety equipment. Water that is not properly treated can spread skin, ear and stomach infections.

    Recorded 21 times across 17 separate inspections, most recently on March 5, 2026. For example: Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?

  • Food temperature controlHigher risk

    Inspectors check that anything that has to be kept at a set temperature, such as chilled or hot food, or equipment like sterilizers, stays in its safe range and that accurate thermometers are on hand. With food, temperature problems are one of the most common causes of food poisoning.

    Recorded 3 times across 3 separate inspections, most recently on November 27, 2025. For example: Is the pool maintained in a clean and sanitary condition, good repair and are temperatures being properly regulated?

  • Chemicals and toxic substancesHigher risk

    Pool chemicals such as chlorine and acid must be labelled, stored apart from each other and handled safely. Mixing them by mistake can release toxic gas, so storage and handling problems are treated seriously.

    Recorded once on August 26, 2025. For example: Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

26 inspections

  1. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  2. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample collected on Mar 2 is reported as unsatisfactory with HPC at 2770 cfu/ml.
  3. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  4. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • The pool water sample collected on January 26, 2026 was not analyzed by the laboratory due to incorrect information provided on the requisition form.
  5. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  6. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Water sample collected on January 12, 2026 was reported to be unsatisfactory.
  7. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • The water sample collected on Dec. 15, 2025, was insufficient in volume, which prevented the laboratory from performing all required tests.
  8. Demand Inspection

    0 infractions

  9. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Water sample submitted on November 24, 2025 is reported to be unsatisfactory.
    • 14. Is the pool maintained in a clean and sanitary condition, good repair and are temperatures being properly regulated?
      • The flow rater meter is not functional. The replacement has been ordered.
  10. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • The flow rate meter reading was 26 GPM, while the designed flow rate is at 45 GPM. - Ensure the flow rate meter is in good working order and the system is running at the designed flow rate.
  11. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 14. Is the pool maintained in a clean and sanitary condition, good repair and are temperatures being properly regulated?
      • The flow rater meter is not functional. The replacement has been ordered.
  12. Monitoring Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Free available chlorine residual (FAC) in the water was measured at a level < 2ppm. - Operator was advised to close the hot tub to fix the clogged chemical feeding line and ensure the FAC is maintained above 2ppm.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • The flow rate meter reading was 26 GPM, while the designed flow rate is at 45 GPM. - Ensure the flow rate meter is in good working order and the system is running at the designed flow rate.
    • 14. Is the pool maintained in a clean and sanitary condition, good repair and are temperatures being properly regulated?
      • The chlorine dosing line is clogged. Please ensure the line is either thoroughly cleaned or replaced to restore proper function of the chemical dosing system.
  13. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • The flow rate meter reading was 26 GPM, while the designed flow rate is at 45 GPM. - Ensure the flow rate meter is in good working order and the system is running at the designed flow rate.
  14. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample submitted on June 2, 2025 is reported unsatisfactory. - A thorough system check is required.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • The flow rate meter reading was 26 GPM, while the designed flow rate is at 45 GPM. - Ensure the flow rate meter is in good working order and the system is running at the designed flow rate.
  15. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • The flow rate meter reading was 26 GPM, while the designed flow rate is at 45 GPM. - Ensure the flow rate meter is in good working order and the system is running at the designed flow rate.
  16. Demand Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Water sample collected on April 21 was unsatisfactory: Pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample collected on April 21 was unsatisfactory: Heterotrophic Plate Count was 1,170.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • The flow rate meter reading was 26 GPM, while the designed flow rate is at 45 GPM. - Ensure the flow rate meter is in good working order and the system is running at the designed flow rate.
  17. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • The flow rate meter reading was 26 GPM, while the designed flow rate is at 45 GPM. - Ensure the flow rate meter is in good working order and the system is running at the designed flow rate.
  18. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample collected on March 10 is reported to be unsatisfactory.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • The flow rate meter reading was 26 GPM, while the designed flow rate is at 45 GPM. - Ensure the flow rate meter is in good working order and the system is running at the designed flow rate.
  19. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • The flow rate meter reading was 26 GPM, while the designed flow rate is at 45 GPM. - Ensure the flow rate meter is in good working order and the system is running at the designed flow rate.
  20. Monitoring Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • The flow rate meter reading was 26 GPM, while the designed flow rate is at 45 GPM. - Ensure the flow rate meter is in good working order and the system is running at the designed flow rate.
  21. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample collected on Dec. 2 is reported unsatisfactory with HPC at 150 CFU/ml.
  22. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  23. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample collected on May 21, 2024, is reported to be unsatisfactory with HPC > 100 CFU/ml.
  24. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  25. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  26. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website