Skip to content
Loading map…

Culture Crust

1-2 188 Main St S Brampton ON L6W 2E2 · Restaurant

Inspection summary

Culture Crust has been inspected 8 times by Peel Public Health (Region of Peel) since April 8, 2025. The most recent inspection, on September 18, 2026, recorded 4 infractions.

2 of 8 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 6 inspections with 18 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Handwashing and staff hygiene, Cleaning and sanitizing and Protecting food from contamination.

Recent inspections have recorded more infractions than earlier ones, so it is worth reading the latest reports closely.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their violations differently, so we group them by what they mean for food safety. Higher-risk findings are the ones inspectors treat as critical, because they can directly make someone sick.

  • Handwashing and staff hygieneHigher risk

    Hands are the main way germs like norovirus move from people to food. Inspectors look for stocked, accessible handwashing sinks, staff washing hands when required, hair restraints, and sick employees being kept away from food. Gaps here can spread illness quickly.

    Recorded 3 times across 3 separate inspections, most recently on September 18, 2026. For example: Did operator provide the required supplies at each handwashing station?

  • Cleaning and sanitizingHigher risk

    Anything that touches food, such as cutting boards, dishes and utensils, must be washed, rinsed and sanitized. Inspectors check dishwasher temperatures, sanitizer strength and how wiping cloths are stored. Poor sanitizing lets bacteria survive from one use to the next.

    Recorded 3 times across 3 separate inspections, most recently on September 15, 2026. For example: Did operator properly maintain food contact surfaces?

  • Protecting food from contaminationHigher risk

    This covers how food is stored, prepared and displayed: raw meat kept away from ready-to-eat food, food covered and stored off the floor, and nothing dripping or splashing into it. Cross-contamination from raw to cooked food is a direct route for salmonella and E. coli.

    Recorded once on September 15, 2026. For example: Did operator store food to prevent contamination and/or adulteration? (Significant Risk)

  • Food temperature controlHigher risk

    Bacteria multiply fastest between about 4 °C and 60 °C (40 °F to 140 °F). Inspectors check that cold food stays cold, hot food stays hot, cooked food is cooled quickly, and that staff have accurate thermometers. Temperature problems are one of the most common causes of food poisoning, so these are treated as critical findings.

    Recorded once on July 2, 2025. For example: Did operator keep potentially hazardous food out of the temperature danger zone, and provide adequately sized refrigeration and/or hot-holding equipment/space for the safe storage of such food? (Significant risk)

  • Building, plumbing and upkeepLower risk

    Floors, walls and ceilings must be smooth and clean, with working lighting, ventilation, plumbing, hot and cold water, and washrooms. These are rarely an immediate food-safety risk on their own, but persistent problems can lead to pest or sanitation issues.

    Recorded 5 times across 5 separate inspections, most recently on September 18, 2026. For example: Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?

About this data

These results come from Peel Public Health (Region of Peel), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

8 inspections

  1. Follow-up

    4 infractions

    • Did operator provide an adequate number of handwashing stations that are conveniently accessible to food handlers?
    • Did operator provide the required supplies at each handwashing station?
    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
    • Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?
  2. Complaint

    5 infractions

    • Did operator store food to prevent contamination and/or adulteration? (Significant Risk)
    • Did operator properly maintain food contact surfaces?
    • Did operator provide the required supplies at each handwashing station?
    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
    • Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?
  3. Required

    3 infractions

    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
    • Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?
    • Is at least one food handler/supervisor with valid food handler certification present on-site during every hour of operation?
  4. Required

    3 infractions

    • Did operator provide a test reagent to determine the concentration of sanitizer?
    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
    • Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?
  5. Follow-up

    0 infractions

  6. Required

    3 infractions

    • Did operator properly maintain food contact surfaces?
    • Did operator provide the required supplies at each handwashing station?
    • Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?
  7. Required

    1 infraction

    • Did operator keep potentially hazardous food out of the temperature danger zone, and provide adequately sized refrigeration and/or hot-holding equipment/space for the safe storage of such food? (Significant risk)
  8. Required

    0 infractions

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website