Skip to content
Loading map…

Kanda Sushi Japanese Buffet

8-2325 Hurontario St Mississauga ON L5A 4C7 · Restaurant

Official record from Peel Region →

Inspection summary

Kanda Sushi Japanese Buffet has been inspected 6 times by Peel Public Health (Region of Peel) since November 12, 2024. The most recent inspection, on July 15, 2026, recorded 4 infractions.

None of the 6 inspections on record were free of infractions. In the past 12 months there were 2 inspections with 7 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Pests, Cleaning and sanitizing and Protecting food from contamination.

Recent inspections have recorded more infractions than earlier ones, so it is worth reading the latest reports closely.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their violations differently, so we group them by what they mean for food safety. Higher-risk findings are the ones inspectors treat as critical, because they can directly make someone sick.

  • PestsHigher risk

    Signs of mice, rats, cockroaches or flies, or gaps and clutter that let them get in or hide. Pests carry bacteria and can contaminate food and surfaces, so evidence of activity is treated seriously and usually triggers a follow-up visit.

    Recorded 2 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on July 15, 2026. For example: Did operator take adequate measures to maintain food premises in a condition that prevent harbourage or breeding of pests? (Significant Risk)

  • Cleaning and sanitizingHigher risk

    Anything that touches food, such as cutting boards, dishes and utensils, must be washed, rinsed and sanitized. Inspectors check dishwasher temperatures, sanitizer strength and how wiping cloths are stored. Poor sanitizing lets bacteria survive from one use to the next.

    Recorded 2 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on January 16, 2026. For example: Did operator properly maintain food contact surfaces?

  • Protecting food from contaminationHigher risk

    This covers how food is stored, prepared and displayed: raw meat kept away from ready-to-eat food, food covered and stored off the floor, and nothing dripping or splashing into it. Cross-contamination from raw to cooked food is a direct route for salmonella and E. coli.

    Recorded once on July 15, 2026. For example: Did operator store food to prevent contamination and/or adulteration? (Significant Risk)

  • Equipment and utensilsLower risk

    Equipment has to be built from cleanable materials, kept in good repair and stored properly. These findings are mostly about upkeep, like a cracked shelf, a worn gasket or utensils stored the wrong way. They are generally lower risk but show how well the kitchen is maintained.

    Recorded 6 times across 6 separate inspections, most recently on July 15, 2026. For example: Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?

  • Food safety training and certificationLower risk

    Most jurisdictions require a certified food handler or manager on site, and some require allergen or food-worker training. These findings mean the paperwork or the trained person was missing at the time. They do not by themselves mean food was handled unsafely.

    Recorded 5 times across 4 separate inspections, most recently on January 16, 2026. For example: Is at least one food handler/supervisor with valid food handler certification present on-site during every hour of operation?

About this data

These results come from Peel Public Health (Region of Peel), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

6 inspections

  1. Required

    4 infractions

    • Did operator store food to prevent contamination and/or adulteration? (Significant Risk)
    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
    • Did operator maintain every washroom in a sanitary condition?
    • Did operator take adequate measures to maintain food premises in a condition that prevent harbourage or breeding of pests? (Significant Risk)
  2. Required

    3 infractions

    • Did operator properly maintain food contact surfaces?
    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
    • Is at least one food handler/supervisor with valid food handler certification present on-site during every hour of operation?
  3. Required

    4 infractions

    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
    • Did operator take adequate measures to maintain food premises in a condition that prevent harbourage or breeding of pests? (Significant Risk)
    • Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?
    • Is at least one food handler/supervisor with valid food handler certification present on-site during every hour of operation?
  4. Required

    2 infractions

    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
    • Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?
  5. Required

    4 infractions

    • Did operator properly maintain food contact surfaces?
    • Did operator provide an adequate number of handwashing stations that are conveniently accessible to food handlers?
    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
    • Is at least one food handler/supervisor with valid food handler certification present on-site during every hour of operation?
  6. Required

    2 infractions

    • Did operator provide an adequate number of handwashing stations that are conveniently accessible to food handlers?
    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website