Mark on 10th - Whirlpool
901 10 Avenue SW Calgary AB T2R 0B5 · Aquatic Facility
Inspection summary
Mark on 10th - Whirlpool has been inspected 26 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since November 23, 2023. The most recent inspection, on July 6, 2026, found no infractions.
5 of 26 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 10 inspections with 12 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Pool and spa water quality, Food temperature control and Chemicals and toxic substances.
The last 2 inspections in a row found no infractions. The number of infractions per inspection has stayed roughly the same over time.
What these findings mean
Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for the people using the facility. Higher-risk findings are the ones that could directly cause illness or injury, such as water that is not properly treated.
Pool and spa water qualityHigher risk
For pools, spas and splash pads, inspectors test disinfectant levels, pH and water clarity, and check safety equipment. Water that is not properly treated can spread skin, ear and stomach infections.
Recorded 21 times across 16 separate inspections, most recently on February 18, 2026. For example:
Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
Food temperature controlHigher risk
Inspectors check that anything that has to be kept at a set temperature, such as chilled or hot food, or equipment like sterilizers, stays in its safe range and that accurate thermometers are on hand. With food, temperature problems are one of the most common causes of food poisoning.
Recorded 6 times across 6 separate inspections, most recently on January 15, 2026. For example:
Is the pool maintained in a clean and sanitary condition, good repair and are temperatures being properly regulated?
Chemicals and toxic substancesHigher risk
Pool chemicals such as chlorine and acid must be labelled, stored apart from each other and handled safely. Mixing them by mistake can release toxic gas, so storage and handling problems are treated seriously.
Recorded 2 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on January 20, 2026. For example:
Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
About this data
These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.
26 inspections
- Risk Management Inspection
0 infractions
- Risk Management Inspection
0 infractions
- Demand Inspection
2 infractions
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Bacteriological water sample collected on Feb 4/26 had Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated. - Discussed with the pool operator treatment for the whirlpool water, cleaning/disinfection of the basin and surfaces and submitting a resample.
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Water sample (26ES-043E00143) collected on February 12th, 2026, came back unsatisfactory as the HPC was elevated (tested to be > 57,000 CFU/mL). The maximum acceptable concentration is 100 CFU/mL.
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Demand Inspection
2 infractions
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Bacteriological water sample collected on Feb 4/26 had Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated. - Discussed with the pool operator treatment for the whirlpool water, cleaning/disinfection of the basin and surfaces and submitting a resample.
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Water sample (26ES-043E00143) collected on February 12th, 2026, came back unsatisfactory as the HPC was elevated (tested to be > 57,000 CFU/mL). The maximum acceptable concentration is 100 CFU/mL.
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Demand Inspection
1 infraction
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Bacteriological water sample collected on Feb 4/26 had Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated. - Discussed with the pool operator treatment for the whirlpool water, cleaning/disinfection of the basin and surfaces and submitting a resample.
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Risk Management Inspection
0 infractions
- Monitoring Inspection
1 infraction
- 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Cyanuric acid measured at 70mg/L, 64mg/L, and 64mg/L on initial visit (multiple tests completed to confirm concentration). The operator closed the whirlpool and began draining and refilling at the time of the inspection. Cyanuric acid was tested during the draining and refilling process: 59mg/L, and after more draining and refilling: 52mg/L. The operator continued to drain and refill to ensure the cyanuric acid level was below 50mg/L. Please ensure that cyanuric acid is mainatined below 50 mg/L to allow for proper chlorination and to avoid "chlorine lock".
- 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Risk Management Inspection
1 infraction
- 14. Is the pool maintained in a clean and sanitary condition, good repair and are temperatures being properly regulated?
- During inspection missing tiles were observed on the deck of the pool. - The operator has already requested repair and coming in August depending on the weather.
- 14. Is the pool maintained in a clean and sanitary condition, good repair and are temperatures being properly regulated?
- Demand Inspection
3 infractions
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Water sample collected on Dec 29, 2025 came back unsatisfactory with Pseudomonas aeruginosa present. Please treat the whirlpool, chemically balance the water and resubmit a water sample.
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Water sample (26ES-006E00450) collected on January 5th, 2026, came back unsatisfactory as the HPC was elevated (500CFU/mL). The maximum acceptable concentration is 100CFU/mL.Whirlpool must be closed, treated, and resampled.
- 14. Is the pool maintained in a clean and sanitary condition, good repair and are temperatures being properly regulated?
- During inspection missing tiles were observed on the deck of the pool. - The operator has already requested repair and coming in August depending on the weather.
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Demand Inspection
2 infractions
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Water sample collected on Dec 29, 2025 came back unsatisfactory with Pseudomonas aeruginosa present. Please treat the whirlpool, chemically balance the water and resubmit a water sample.
- 14. Is the pool maintained in a clean and sanitary condition, good repair and are temperatures being properly regulated?
- During inspection missing tiles were observed on the deck of the pool. - The operator has already requested repair and coming in August depending on the weather.
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Risk Management Inspection
1 infraction
- 14. Is the pool maintained in a clean and sanitary condition, good repair and are temperatures being properly regulated?
- During inspection missing tiles were observed on the deck of the pool. - The operator has already requested repair and coming in August depending on the weather.
- 14. Is the pool maintained in a clean and sanitary condition, good repair and are temperatures being properly regulated?
- Demand Inspection
2 infractions
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Water sample (25ES-273E00013) collected on September 29th, 2025, was rejected by the lab as it was received on a holiday (Sept 30th, 2025) without prior approval.please submit a new sample as soon as possible.
- 14. Is the pool maintained in a clean and sanitary condition, good repair and are temperatures being properly regulated?
- During inspection missing tiles were observed on the deck of the pool. - The operator has already requested repair and coming in August depending on the weather.
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Demand Inspection
1 infraction
- 14. Is the pool maintained in a clean and sanitary condition, good repair and are temperatures being properly regulated?
- During inspection missing tiles were observed on the deck of the pool. - The operator has already requested repair and coming in August depending on the weather.
- 14. Is the pool maintained in a clean and sanitary condition, good repair and are temperatures being properly regulated?
- Risk Management Inspection
0 infractions
- Demand Inspection
2 infractions
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Water sample (25ES-175E00498) collected on June 23rd, 2025, was unsatisfactory as the HPC level was measured to be 1060CFU/mL (maximum acceptable level is 100 CFU/mL). Please re-sample the whirlpool as soon as possible.
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Water sample (25ES-182E00027) was rejected by the lab as a non-urgent sample was received on a weekend/holiday without prior approval. Submitted on June 30th, 2025, and was received at the lab on July 1st, 2025, (stat holiday). Please submit a new water sample.
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Demand Inspection
1 infraction
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Water sample (25ES-175E00498) collected on June 23rd, 2025, was unsatisfactory as the HPC level was measured to be 1060CFU/mL (maximum acceptable level is 100 CFU/mL). Please re-sample the whirlpool as soon as possible.
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Demand Inspection
1 infraction
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Water sample taken Jan 20, 2025 - HPC was 160 CFU/mL.-Resample
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Demand Inspection
1 infraction
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Water sample taken Dec 2, 2024 - Pseudomonas isolated.-Treat and resample
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Risk Management Inspection
0 infractions
- Demand Inspection
1 infraction
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Water sample taken Oct 7, 2024 - HPC 120 CFU/mL.-Resample
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Monitoring Inspection
1 infraction
- 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Cyanuric measured at 66 mg/L on initial visit.-Maintain cyanuric acid below 50 mg/L-Operator ceased access to basin and diluted the water, confirmed on second visit that it was <50mg/L
- 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Demand Inspection
1 infraction
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Water sample taken July 16, 2024 - HPC 260 CFU/mL-Resample
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Demand Inspection
1 infraction
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Water sample collected Jul 2, 2024 - not tested-Resample
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Demand Inspection
1 infraction
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Water sample collected June 3, 2024 - HPC 1040 CFU/mL-Resample
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Demand Inspection
2 infractions
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- The water sample result from the sample taken Apr 29, 2024 was Pseudomonas: isolated-Treat and re-sample
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- The water sample result from the sample taken Apr 29, 2024 was HPC @ 160 CFU/mL.-Re-sample
- 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
- Demand Inspection
1 infraction
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
- Water sample taken Nov 20, 2023 had a result of HPC 350 CFU/mL.-Re-sample
- 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
Nearby inspected facilities
- Mark On 10th - Common
901 10 Avenue SW Calgary AB T2R 0B5
3 inspections
- Aeon Future Health Inc.
200 - 903 10 Avenue SW Calgary AB T2R 0Z9
1 inspection
- Sucre Patisserie
1007 8 Street SW Calgary AB T2R 0Z6
4 inspections
- NAM Vietnamese Kitchen
1 - 1023 8 Street SW Calgary AB T2R 0Z6
6 inspections
- Inn From The Cold
120 - 999 8 Street SW Calgary AB T2R 1J8
4 inspections
- Hope Like Hell Tattoo
210 - 927 10 Avenue SW Calgary AB T2R 1A8
1 inspection
- Flawless Injections
210 - 927 10 Avenue SW Calgary AB T2R 1A8
3 inspections
- Electro Beauty
210 - 927 10 Avenue SW Calgary AB T2R 1A8
1 inspection