Skip to content
Loading map…

Marry Me Mochi West

129 Lakeshore Rd E Mississauga ON L5G 1E5 · Restaurant

Inspection summary

Marry Me Mochi West has been inspected 5 times by Peel Public Health (Region of Peel) since November 5, 2024. The most recent inspection, on April 27, 2026, recorded 1 infraction.

None of the 5 inspections on record were free of infractions. In the past 12 months there were 2 inspections with 4 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Protecting food from contamination and Cleaning and sanitizing.

Recent inspections have recorded fewer infractions than earlier ones, so the record is improving.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their violations differently, so we group them by what they mean for food safety. Higher-risk findings are the ones inspectors treat as critical, because they can directly make someone sick.

  • Protecting food from contaminationHigher risk

    This covers how food is stored, prepared and displayed: raw meat kept away from ready-to-eat food, food covered and stored off the floor, and nothing dripping or splashing into it. Cross-contamination from raw to cooked food is a direct route for salmonella and E. coli.

    Recorded 3 times across 3 separate inspections, most recently on March 13, 2026. For example: Did operator store food to prevent contamination and/or adulteration? (Significant Risk)

  • Cleaning and sanitizingHigher risk

    Anything that touches food, such as cutting boards, dishes and utensils, must be washed, rinsed and sanitized. Inspectors check dishwasher temperatures, sanitizer strength and how wiping cloths are stored. Poor sanitizing lets bacteria survive from one use to the next.

    Recorded 3 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on February 12, 2025. For example: Did operator provide a test reagent to determine the concentration of sanitizer?

  • Equipment and utensilsLower risk

    Equipment has to be built from cleanable materials, kept in good repair and stored properly. These findings are mostly about upkeep, like a cracked shelf, a worn gasket or utensils stored the wrong way. They are generally lower risk but show how well the kitchen is maintained.

    Recorded 4 times across 4 separate inspections, most recently on April 27, 2026. For example: Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?

  • Food safety training and certificationLower risk

    Most jurisdictions require a certified food handler or manager on site, and some require allergen or food-worker training. These findings mean the paperwork or the trained person was missing at the time. They do not by themselves mean food was handled unsafely.

    Recorded 4 times across 3 separate inspections, most recently on March 13, 2026. For example: Is at least one food handler/supervisor with valid food handler certification present on-site during every hour of operation?

  • Building, plumbing and upkeepLower risk

    Floors, walls and ceilings must be smooth and clean, with working lighting, ventilation, plumbing, hot and cold water, and washrooms. These are rarely an immediate food-safety risk on their own, but persistent problems can lead to pest or sanitation issues.

    Recorded once on November 5, 2024. For example: Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?

About this data

These results come from Peel Public Health (Region of Peel), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

5 inspections

  1. Required

    1 infraction

    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
  2. Required

    3 infractions

    • Did operator store food to prevent contamination and/or adulteration? (Significant Risk)
    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
    • Is at least one food handler/supervisor with valid food handler certification present on-site during every hour of operation?
  3. Required

    2 infractions

    • Did operator store food to prevent contamination and/or adulteration? (Significant Risk)
    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
  4. Required

    4 infractions

    • Did operator provide an adequate number of handwashing stations that are conveniently accessible to food handlers?
    • Did operator provide a test reagent to determine the concentration of sanitizer?
    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
    • Is at least one food handler/supervisor with valid food handler certification present on-site during every hour of operation?
  5. Required

    5 infractions

    • Did operator store food to prevent contamination and/or adulteration? (Significant Risk)
    • Did operator provide a test reagent to determine the concentration of sanitizer?
    • Did operator properly wash and sanitize utensils?
    • Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?
    • Is at least one food handler/supervisor with valid food handler certification present on-site during every hour of operation?

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website