Skip to content
Loading map…

MPA Tilikum House - Mental Health

3126 Grandview Hwy, Vancouver BC V5M 2E8 · Mental Health

Official record from Vancouver Coastal →

Inspection summary

MPA Tilikum House - Mental Health has been inspected 8 times by Vancouver Coastal Health since January 20, 2022. The most recent inspection, on July 11, 2026, found no infractions.

3 of 8 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there was 1 inspection with 0 infractions recorded. All recorded findings relate to upkeep, equipment or paperwork rather than direct health risks.

The last 2 inspections in a row found no infractions. Recent inspections have recorded fewer infractions than earlier ones, so the record is improving.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for your health. Higher-risk findings are the ones inspectors treat as critical, because they can directly make someone sick.

  • Permits, records and postingLower risk

    Operating permits, required signage, written procedures and logs. These findings are administrative: the documentation was missing or out of date at the time of inspection.

    Recorded 10 times across 5 separate inspections, most recently on June 11, 2025. For example: There is an emergency plan displayed in a prominent place that sets out procedures to prepare for, mitigate, respond to and recover from any emergency, including procedures for evacuation and how persons in care will be cared for [RCR Sec 51(1),(4)]

  • Food safety training and certificationLower risk

    Many jurisdictions require a trained or certified person on site, such as a certified food handler. These findings mean the training record or the trained person was missing at the time. They do not by themselves mean anything was handled unsafely.

    Recorded 3 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on March 30, 2022. For example: The MSAC establishes and reviews training, orientation programs, and policies and procedures [RCR Sec 68(3);DOLSOP Preventing Opioid Overdose]

  • Other findingsLower risk

    Findings that do not fit the categories above, such as follow-ups that confirm an earlier violation was corrected, or requirements specific to this type of facility.

    Recorded 2 times on January 20, 2022. For example: Risk of leaving the facility without notification is assessed on admission [RCR Sec 49(3)]

About this data

These results come from Vancouver Coastal Health, which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

8 inspections

  1. Routine

    0 infractions

  2. Routine Follow-up

    0 infractions

  3. Routine

    2 infractions

    • There is an emergency plan displayed in a prominent place that sets out procedures to prepare for, mitigate, respond to and recover from any emergency, including procedures for evacuation and how persons in care will be cared for [RCR Sec 51(1),(4)]
    • The facility has written policies and procedures as prescribed by the regulation [RCR Sec 85(2)(b-l)]
      • There is no written policy and procedure for the use of restraints in an emergency.
  4. Routine

    3 infractions

    • There is an emergency plan displayed in a prominent place that sets out procedures to prepare for, mitigate, respond to and recover from any emergency, including procedures for evacuation and how persons in care will be cared for [RCR Sec 51(1),(4)]
    • The facility has a written policy and procedure for obtaining consent, in accordance with Part 3 of the Health Care (Consent) and Care Facility (Admission) Act, before admitting an adult to the community care facility. [RCR Sec 85(2)(m)]
    • The facility has written policies and procedures as prescribed by the regulation [RCR Sec 85(2)(b-l)]
  5. Routine

    1 infraction

    • For facilities with 24 or fewer persons in care, a nutrition plan is developed assessing specific nutrition needs and consider risk of being inadequately nourished. [RCR Sec 83(1)]
      • Nutrition plan does not assess specific nutrition needs.
      • Nutrition plan does not consider risk of being inadequately nourished.
  6. Routine Follow-up

    0 infractions

  7. Routine Follow-up

    2 infractions

    • The facility has a written policy and procedure for obtaining consent, in accordance with Part 3 of the Health Care (Consent) and Care Facility (Admission) Act, before admitting an adult to the community care facility. [RCR Sec 85(2)(m)]
    • The MSAC establishes and reviews training, orientation programs, and policies and procedures [RCR Sec 68(3);DOLSOP Preventing Opioid Overdose]
  8. Routine

    7 infractions

    • The facility has a written policy and procedure for obtaining consent, in accordance with Part 3 of the Health Care (Consent) and Care Facility (Admission) Act, before admitting an adult to the community care facility. [RCR Sec 85(2)(m)]
    • Risk of leaving the facility without notification is assessed on admission [RCR Sec 49(3)]
    • There are appropriate, safe and secure locations for medications and the records of persons in care [RCR Sec 35(1)(b)]
    • The MSAC establishes and reviews training, orientation programs, and policies and procedures [RCR Sec 68(3);DOLSOP Preventing Opioid Overdose]
    • The written policies and procedures are reviewed and revised if necessary at least once each year [RCR Sec 85(1)(b)]
    • The facility keeps a record for each person in care with the information specified by the regulation [RCR Sec 78(1)]
      • Files lacks immunization status.
    • There is consent in writing from the person in care or a parent or representative to call a medical practitioner, nurse practitioner or ambulance in case of accident or illness [RCR Sec 78(3)(a)]

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website