Skip to content
Loading map…

New Brighton Residents Association - Spray Park

2 New Brighton Drive SE Calgary AB T2Z 4B2 · Aquatic Facility

Official record from Alberta →

Inspection summary

New Brighton Residents Association - Spray Park has been inspected 11 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since May 16, 2024. The most recent inspection, on July 10, 2026, recorded 1 infraction.

3 of 11 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 5 inspections with 6 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Pool and spa water quality and Chemicals and toxic substances.

The number of infractions per inspection has stayed roughly the same over time.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for the people using the facility. Higher-risk findings are the ones that could directly cause illness or injury, such as water that is not properly treated.

  • Pool and spa water qualityHigher risk

    For pools, spas and splash pads, inspectors test disinfectant levels, pH and water clarity, and check safety equipment. Water that is not properly treated can spread skin, ear and stomach infections.

    Recorded 5 times across 5 separate inspections, most recently on July 10, 2026. For example: Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?

  • Chemicals and toxic substancesHigher risk

    Pool chemicals such as chlorine and acid must be labelled, stored apart from each other and handled safely. Mixing them by mistake can release toxic gas, so storage and handling problems are treated seriously.

    Recorded once on May 14, 2026. For example: Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?

  • Food safety training and certificationLower risk

    Many jurisdictions require trained pool operators and certified lifeguards. These findings mean required training, certification or staffing records were missing at the time of inspection.

    Recorded 4 times across 4 separate inspections, most recently on May 20, 2026. For example: Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

11 inspections

  1. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample submitted July 7, 2026, was not processed (cancelled) as there was no identification number on the sample bottle.Please submit a new sample.
  2. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  3. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • 1. The bacteriological water sample collected on May 20, 2026 was not tested, because the time of collection was not indicated on the requisition form.
    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • The operator did not have any written procedures for general sanitation, and fecal incident response. - Please ensure to have written procedures for general sanitation plan, and water quality incident response plan.
  4. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • The operator did not have any written procedures for general sanitation, and fecal incident response. - Please ensure to have written procedures for general sanitation plan, and water quality incident response plan.
  5. Monitoring Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • The following violations were noted: 1. Free available chlorine (FAC) was measured at 0.25 ppm, which is below the required minimum of 2.0 ppm for a stand‑alone spray park. The operator confirmed that the chemical feeder was not operating at the time of inspection.2. The pH was measured at 7.84, which is outside of the acceptable range between 6.8 - 7.6.
    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • The operator did not have any written procedures for general sanitation, and fecal incident response. - Please ensure to have written procedures for general sanitation plan, and water quality incident response plan.
  6. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • The operator did not have any written procedures for general sanitation, and fecal incident response. - Please ensure to have written procedures for general sanitation plan, and water quality incident response plan.
  7. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • July 16th water sample was not processed as time of collection was not indicated.
  8. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  9. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • July 15th sample was received more than 24 hours after collection. Emailed Craig to resample. Craig indicated that sample was submitted 830am at the Acadia Health Centre for the courier to deliver.
  10. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • June 12, 2024 water sample had total coliform present. Spoke with Craig to treat and conduct resample prior to re-opening after water restriction is lifted.
  11. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

Own this business? Add a badge to your website