Skip to content
Loading map…

Standard Sweets & Snacks

2877 Derry Rd E Mississauga ON L4T 1A6 · Restaurant

Inspection summary

Standard Sweets & Snacks has been inspected 7 times by Peel Public Health (Region of Peel) since October 31, 2024. The most recent inspection, on May 25, 2026, recorded 5 infractions.

2 of 7 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 2 inspections with 6 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Pests, Cleaning and sanitizing and Protecting food from contamination.

The number of infractions per inspection has stayed roughly the same over time.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their violations differently, so we group them by what they mean for food safety. Higher-risk findings are the ones inspectors treat as critical, because they can directly make someone sick.

  • PestsHigher risk

    Signs of mice, rats, cockroaches or flies, or gaps and clutter that let them get in or hide. Pests carry bacteria and can contaminate food and surfaces, so evidence of activity is treated seriously and usually triggers a follow-up visit.

    Recorded 5 times across 4 separate inspections, most recently on May 25, 2026. For example: Did operator protect the premises against the entry of pests and maintain records of all pest control measures?

  • Cleaning and sanitizingHigher risk

    Anything that touches food, such as cutting boards, dishes and utensils, must be washed, rinsed and sanitized. Inspectors check dishwasher temperatures, sanitizer strength and how wiping cloths are stored. Poor sanitizing lets bacteria survive from one use to the next.

    Recorded 3 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on May 25, 2026. For example: Did operator properly maintain food contact surfaces?

  • Protecting food from contaminationHigher risk

    This covers how food is stored, prepared and displayed: raw meat kept away from ready-to-eat food, food covered and stored off the floor, and nothing dripping or splashing into it. Cross-contamination from raw to cooked food is a direct route for salmonella and E. coli.

    Recorded 3 times across 3 separate inspections, most recently on February 3, 2026. For example: Did operator store food to prevent contamination and/or adulteration? (Significant Risk)

  • Food temperature controlHigher risk

    Bacteria multiply fastest between about 4 °C and 60 °C (40 °F to 140 °F). Inspectors check that cold food stays cold, hot food stays hot, cooked food is cooled quickly, and that staff have accurate thermometers. Temperature problems are one of the most common causes of food poisoning, so these are treated as critical findings.

    Recorded 2 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on May 15, 2025. For example: Did operator provide and use accurate and easy-to-read thermometers?

  • Handwashing and staff hygieneHigher risk

    Hands are the main way germs like norovirus move from people to food. Inspectors look for stocked, accessible handwashing sinks, staff washing hands when required, hair restraints, and sick employees being kept away from food. Gaps here can spread illness quickly.

    Recorded once on February 27, 2025. For example: Did operator provide the required supplies at each handwashing station?

About this data

These results come from Peel Public Health (Region of Peel), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

7 inspections

  1. Required

    5 infractions

    • Did operator properly maintain food contact surfaces?
    • Did operator properly wash and sanitize utensils?
    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
    • Did operator protect the premises against the entry of pests and maintain records of all pest control measures?
    • Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?
  2. Required

    1 infraction

    • Did operator store food to prevent contamination and/or adulteration? (Significant Risk)
  3. Required

    2 infractions

    • Did operator properly maintain food contact surfaces?
    • Did operator protect the premises against the entry of pests and maintain records of all pest control measures?
  4. Required

    3 infractions

    • Did operator provide and use accurate and easy-to-read thermometers?
    • Did operator store food to prevent contamination and/or adulteration? (Significant Risk)
    • Did operator protect the premises against the entry of pests and maintain records of all pest control measures?
  5. Follow-up

    0 infractions

  6. Required

    7 infractions

    • Did operator keep potentially hazardous food out of the temperature danger zone, and provide adequately sized refrigeration and/or hot-holding equipment/space for the safe storage of such food? (Significant risk)
    • Did operator store food to prevent contamination and/or adulteration? (Significant Risk)
    • Did operator provide the required supplies at each handwashing station?
    • Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
    • Did operator protect the premises against the entry of pests and maintain records of all pest control measures?
    • Did operator take adequate measures to maintain food premises in a condition that prevent harbourage or breeding of pests? (Significant Risk)
    • Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?
  7. Required

    0 infractions

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website