Skip to content
Loading map…

Best Western Plus Edmonton Airport - Whirlpool

5705 50 Street Leduc AB T9E 6Z8 · Aquatic Facility

Official record from Alberta →

Inspection summary

Best Western Plus Edmonton Airport - Whirlpool has been inspected 13 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since March 22, 2024. The most recent inspection, on July 27, 2026, found no infractions.

3 of 13 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 7 inspections with 6 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Chemicals and toxic substances and Pool and spa water quality.

The number of infractions per inspection has stayed roughly the same over time.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for the people using the facility. Higher-risk findings are the ones that could directly cause illness or injury, such as water that is not properly treated.

  • Chemicals and toxic substancesHigher risk

    Pool chemicals such as chlorine and acid must be labelled, stored apart from each other and handled safely. Mixing them by mistake can release toxic gas, so storage and handling problems are treated seriously.

    Recorded 7 times across 7 separate inspections, most recently on February 4, 2026. For example: Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?

  • Pool and spa water qualityHigher risk

    For pools, spas and splash pads, inspectors test disinfectant levels, pH and water clarity, and check safety equipment. Water that is not properly treated can spread skin, ear and stomach infections.

    Recorded 6 times across 4 separate inspections, most recently on July 10, 2026. For example: Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?

  • Permits, records and postingLower risk

    Operating permits, water-test logs, posted bather rules and emergency procedures. Daily test logs are how operators show the water was checked and treated between inspections.

    Recorded 4 times across 4 separate inspections, most recently on July 15, 2024. For example: Does the facility have a valid permit and does the facility operate in compliance with the conditions of that permit?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

13 inspections

  1. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  2. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • pseudomonas aeringosa was isolated in the sample collected on July 7th.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • The heterotrophic plate count was 3,200 for the sample collected on July 7th.
  3. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  4. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Water sample results for sample collected Feb 17th:-Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Isolated
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Whirlpool sample results for the sample that was collected on Feb 17th:- HPC: >57,000
  5. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  6. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • The chlorine test kit was unable to provide a reading because the chlorine concentration was above the measurable range. The automated controller reading for the chlorine was 8.26. The operator was in the process of backwashing.
  7. Monitoring Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • The free available chlorine was 0.9 on the pool kit. The automatic controller had its alert sign flashing and was rebooted at the time of inspection.
  8. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Pool alkalinity was observed at 57ppm. Operator is advised to keep alkalinity within 60-180ppm range.
  9. Monitoring Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Pool alkalinity was observed at 57ppm. Operator is advised to keep alkalinity within 60-180ppm range.
  10. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 11. Does the facility have a valid permit and does the facility operate in compliance with the conditions of that permit?
      • *** Pool permit not observed.Ensure that the pool permit is displayed July 04, 2024: Pool permit was still not observed. Please ensure your pool permit is displayed at the facility.
  11. Monitoring Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Combined Chlorine was measured to be at 1.69ppm.Please ensure combined chlorine is maintained at the lowest possible level.
    • 11. Does the facility have a valid permit and does the facility operate in compliance with the conditions of that permit?
      • *** Pool permit not observed.Ensure that the pool permit is displayed July 04, 2024: Pool permit was still not observed. Please ensure your pool permit is displayed at the facility.
  12. Risk Management Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample # 2626250 submitted on March 19, 2024 revealed HPC level 770 CFU per ml.
    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Total alkalinity is 30 ppm.
    • 11. Does the facility have a valid permit and does the facility operate in compliance with the conditions of that permit?
      • *** Pool permit not observed.Ensure that the pool permit is displayed
  13. Risk Management Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample # 2626250 submitted on March 19, 2024 revealed HPC level 770 CFU per ml.
    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Total alkalinity is 30 ppm.
    • 11. Does the facility have a valid permit and does the facility operate in compliance with the conditions of that permit?
      • *** Pool permit not observed.Ensure that the pool permit is displayed

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website