Skip to content
Loading map…

Panda Hut

5603 50 Street Leduc AB T9E 6Z7 · Food - General

Inspection summary

Panda Hut has been inspected 10 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since May 21, 2024. The most recent inspection, on November 6, 2025, recorded 3 infractions.

6 of 10 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there was 1 inspection with 3 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Food temperature control and Cleaning and sanitizing.

The number of infractions per inspection has stayed roughly the same over time.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their violations differently, so we group them by what they mean for food safety. Higher-risk findings are the ones inspectors treat as critical, because they can directly make someone sick.

  • Food temperature controlHigher risk

    Bacteria multiply fastest between about 4 °C and 60 °C (40 °F to 140 °F). Inspectors check that cold food stays cold, hot food stays hot, cooked food is cooled quickly, and that staff have accurate thermometers. Temperature problems are one of the most common causes of food poisoning, so these are treated as critical findings.

    Recorded 3 times across 3 separate inspections, most recently on November 6, 2025. For example: Are food temperatures during storage and processing being controlled to maximize food safety?

  • Cleaning and sanitizingHigher risk

    Anything that touches food, such as cutting boards, dishes and utensils, must be washed, rinsed and sanitized. Inspectors check dishwasher temperatures, sanitizer strength and how wiping cloths are stored. Poor sanitizing lets bacteria survive from one use to the next.

    Recorded once on November 6, 2025. For example: Does the operator use approved methods for cleaning and sanitizing equipment, utensils, and surfaces?

  • Food safety training and certificationLower risk

    Most jurisdictions require a certified food handler or manager on site, and some require allergen or food-worker training. These findings mean the paperwork or the trained person was missing at the time. They do not by themselves mean food was handled unsafely.

    Recorded once on November 6, 2025. For example: Do food handlers ensure that food is protected from contamination (unless noted elsewhere)(Non-Critical)?

  • Building, plumbing and upkeepLower risk

    Floors, walls and ceilings must be smooth and clean, with working lighting, ventilation, plumbing, hot and cold water, and washrooms. These are rarely an immediate food-safety risk on their own, but persistent problems can lead to pest or sanitation issues.

    Recorded once on May 27, 2025. For example: Is the facility properly constructed and maintained in a state of good repair to allow for the safe and sanitary handling of food?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

10 inspections

  1. Monitoring Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 04. Does the operator use approved methods for cleaning and sanitizing equipment, utensils, and surfaces?
      • A mixed sanitizer solution was not available. This was corrected at the time of inspection. The chlorine sanitizer was 100ppm.The cleaning clothes were placed into the sanitizer bucket.
    • 08. Do food handlers ensure that food is protected from contamination (unless noted elsewhere)(Non-Critical)?
      • Plastic containers were being used as scoops and stored directly inside bins containing flour, sugar, and rice. These containers were removed during the inspection. The ice machine located at the front had a scoop stored with its handle submerged in the ice. This scoop was removed at the time of inspection.
    • 10. Are food temperatures during storage and processing being controlled to maximize food safety?
      • Frozen chicken was at room temperature. The chicken was moved to the cooler at the time of inspection. The staff reported that the chicken was moved out of the cooler to rearrange the food in the cooler.
  2. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  3. Monitoring Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 21. Is the facility properly constructed and maintained in a state of good repair to allow for the safe and sanitary handling of food?
      • Some food products and other materials are stored on floor. Operator is advised to store all materials on shelves at least 8 inches above the floor so that floor under them can be maintained clean and monitored for insect/ pest activity.
  4. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  5. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 10. Are food temperatures during storage and processing being controlled to maximize food safety?
      • Temperature of the hot holding is still below 60 degrees Celsius.
  6. Monitoring Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 10. Are food temperatures during storage and processing being controlled to maximize food safety?
      • Temperature of the walk-in cooler is recorded 11 degrees Celsius. Operator did not have temperature record for this cooler. Operator is advised to discard high risk food which may have been exposed to temperature abuse. Operator discarded high risk food at the time of inspection. Operator is advised not to use this cooler until repaired.Temperature of food displayed on hot holding is recorded 35 degrees Celsius. Operator discarded high risk food displayed on hot holding. Operator is advised to repair the hot holding unit so that it can maintain its temperature at 60 degrees Celsius or higher.
  7. Initial Inspection

    0 infractions

  8. Demand Inspection

    0 infractions

  9. Initial Inspection

    0 infractions

  10. Demand Inspection

    0 infractions

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website