Skip to content
Loading map…

Calla Beauty Boutique

80 - 10 Ridgemont Way Sherwood Park AB T8A 6B3 · Personal Services

Official record from Alberta →

Inspection summary

Calla Beauty Boutique has been inspected 4 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since December 19, 2024. The most recent inspection, on December 23, 2025, found no infractions.

2 of 4 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 2 inspections with 4 infractions recorded. All recorded findings relate to upkeep, equipment or paperwork rather than direct infection-control risks to clients.

Recent inspections have recorded more infractions than earlier ones, so it is worth reading the latest reports closely.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for clients. In personal service settings like salons, spas and tattoo studios, higher-risk findings are the ones that could spread infection from one client to the next, through broken skin, blood or instruments that were not properly cleaned and sterilized.

  • Equipment and utensilsLower risk

    Instruments, chairs, tables and footbaths must be made of materials that can be cleaned, kept in good repair and stored so they stay clean. Single-use items such as nail files, buffers, razors and needles must be thrown away after each client.

    Recorded 4 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on December 4, 2025. For example: Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?

  • Building, plumbing and upkeepLower risk

    The premises needs a working hand sink, a separate sink for cleaning instruments where required, cleanable surfaces, and good lighting and ventilation. Upkeep problems are usually lower risk on their own, but they make thorough cleaning harder.

    Recorded once on December 4, 2025. For example: Is the facility properly constructed and maintained to allow for the safe and sanitary provision of personal services (Non-Critical)?

  • Other findingsLower risk

    Findings that do not fit the categories above, such as follow-ups that confirm an earlier violation was corrected, or requirements specific to this type of facility.

    Recorded once on December 4, 2025. For example: Are cosmetic products appropriate for their intended use and being handled properly?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

4 inspections

  1. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  2. Monitoring Inspection

    4 infractions

    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • Records of high level disinfectant (HLD) testing were not being maintained. Test strips were available and operator said that they were testing the HLD every day, but not logging the results. Please ensure results of HLD testing are recorded and kept for verification purposes.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • The high level disinfectant (Pre-Empt CS20) being used had expired in 2022. A new bottle was available on site for use. The expired bottle was thrown away during the inspection. No equipment was being reprocessed at the time.
    • 26. Are cosmetic products appropriate for their intended use and being handled properly?
      • An unlabelled bottle of clear liquid was seen during the inspection. Operator informed PHI it was alcohol. PHI asked operator to label bottle with a sharpie, which operator did during inspection. Please ensure all bottles are labelled with their contents.
    • 29. Is the facility properly constructed and maintained to allow for the safe and sanitary provision of personal services (Non-Critical)?
      • The massage table cover was worn in places and was no longer smooth, non-porous and easily cleanable. Please repair or replace cover.
  3. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  4. Monitoring Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 13. Is single-use or uncleanable equipment being used as intended (Critical)?
      • Some nail files were being disinfected between use. Porous items cannot be disinfected as they absorb chemicals, as well there is an inability to remove all physical contamination. The nail files were discarded.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • Pre-empt CS20 was expired. Pre-empt RTU was being used to disinfect semi-critical items. Pre-empt RTU is only for non-critical instruments as well as surfaces. If Pre-empt CS20 is to be used, it is to be tested and logged each day over a maximum 14-day re-use period. Otherwise, it can be poured and discarded after daily use.

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website