Skip to content
Loading map…

FOY Medi-Spa Inc.

9909 Sutherland Street Fort McMurray AB T9H 1V3 · Personal Services

Official record from Alberta →

Inspection summary

FOY Medi-Spa Inc. has been inspected 11 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since January 31, 2024. The most recent inspection, on August 24, 2026, found no infractions.

7 of 11 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 9 inspections with 13 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Hand hygiene and infection control.

Recent inspections have recorded fewer infractions than earlier ones, so the record is improving.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for clients. In personal service settings like salons, spas and tattoo studios, higher-risk findings are the ones that could spread infection from one client to the next, through broken skin, blood or instruments that were not properly cleaned and sterilized.

  • Hand hygiene and infection controlHigher risk

    Infection control is the core of a personal service inspection. Inspectors check that operators clean their hands and change gloves between clients, that a stocked hand sink is available, and that anything that breaks the skin is handled so blood-borne infections such as hepatitis B, hepatitis C and HIV cannot pass from one client to the next.

    Recorded once on November 26, 2025. For example: Is hand hygiene performed by the personal services worker when required, in a proper manner and are provisions available to perform hand hygiene?

  • Equipment and utensilsLower risk

    Instruments, chairs, tables and footbaths must be made of materials that can be cleaned, kept in good repair and stored so they stay clean. Single-use items such as nail files, buffers, razors and needles must be thrown away after each client.

    Recorded 5 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on December 8, 2025. For example: Are the equipment manufacturer's instructions for use of specific equipment available and followed?

  • Food safety training and certificationLower risk

    Some jurisdictions require operators to complete infection-prevention training, or to hold specific qualifications for higher-risk services such as tattooing, piercing or electrolysis. These findings mean the training record was missing at the time. They do not by themselves mean a client was put at risk.

    Recorded 3 times across 3 separate inspections, most recently on December 9, 2025. For example: Has the operator notified the RHA of the existence of a personal service business, including contact and location information, as well as all personal services currently offered or new personal services that will be offered for facilities and/or special events?

  • Permits, records and postingLower risk

    Operating permits, client records, sterilization logs and required signage. Client records matter because they let health officials contact people if an infection is linked to the business.

    Recorded 2 times on November 26, 2025. For example: Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?

  • Building, plumbing and upkeepLower risk

    The premises needs a working hand sink, a separate sink for cleaning instruments where required, cleanable surfaces, and good lighting and ventilation. Upkeep problems are usually lower risk on their own, but they make thorough cleaning harder.

    Recorded once on August 20, 2026. For example: Is the facility properly constructed and maintained to allow for the safe and sanitary provision of personal services (Non-Critical)?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

11 inspections

  1. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  2. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 29. Is the facility properly constructed and maintained to allow for the safe and sanitary provision of personal services (Non-Critical)?
      • The surfaces of two chairs were observed to be porous and not smooth, cleanable, or easily wipeable. In addition, noise-cancelling wall panels were present and were found to have porous surfaces that are not readily cleanable. The owner was advised to either cover the chair surfaces with an impermeable, wipeable plastic covering or replace the chairs with materials that are smooth, non-absorbent, and easy to clean. The walls must also be maintained with smooth, durable, and cleanable finishes.
  3. Demand Inspection

    0 infractions

  4. Demand Inspection

    0 infractions

  5. Demand Inspection

    0 infractions

  6. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  7. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Has the operator notified the RHA of the existence of a personal service business, including contact and location information, as well as all personal services currently offered or new personal services that will be offered for facilities and/or special events?
      • Personal services notification has not been submitted after adding services to facility. Personal services link was provided to the operator onsite to submit the notification.Submit notification at your earliest convenient for new services.
  8. Risk Management Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 02. Has the operator notified the RHA of the existence of a personal service business, including contact and location information, as well as all personal services currently offered or new personal services that will be offered for facilities and/or special events?
      • Personal services notification has not been submitted after adding services to facility. Personal services link was provided to the operator onsite to submit the notification.Submit notification at your earliest convenient for new services.
    • 25. Are the equipment manufacturer's instructions for use of specific equipment available and followed?
      • 1-Manuals for hydra-facial, ultrasonic cavitation equipment were not readily available during inspection. Obtain the manuals for all equipment used in the facility and ensure these are accessible to operators.
  9. Monitoring Inspection

    9 infractions

    • 02. Has the operator notified the RHA of the existence of a personal service business, including contact and location information, as well as all personal services currently offered or new personal services that will be offered for facilities and/or special events?
      • Personal services notification has not been submitted after adding services to facility. Personal services link was provided to the operator onsite to submit the notification.Submit notification at your earliest convenient for new services.
    • 03. Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?
      • Facility specific written procedures for services provided int he facility were not completed. AHS templates were provided to be completed. post care instructions were reportedly available. Operator was advised to email post care to PHI for review.Complete procedures for client care for accidental injuries, skin cleansing, use of antiseptic, postcare
    • 08. Is hand hygiene performed by the personal services worker when required, in a proper manner and are provisions available to perform hand hygiene?
      • Re-useable towels were noted being used in the washroom of the facility. Provide single use microfiber towels in sufficient quantity with basket to collect used towels in the washroom or provide paper towels. Store towels in a way to prevent contamination from the splashes from hand washing.
    • 12. Are personal services workers at the facility maintaining client records and where applicable, sterility documentation corresponding to that client?
      • Sterility assurance documentation for pre-sterilized equipment such as microneedling, dermaplaning was not recorded with client records. Discussed with operator and advised to keep the label (lot #, batch number and expiry date) of cartridges, blades, with client records.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • 1-Semi-critical tools were noted not being immersed in the high-level disinfectant. Operator was educated on the importance of fully immersing the tools in high level disinfectant.Ensure tools are fully immersed in high-level disinfectant for it required contact time.2-High level disinfectant daily testing log was not adequately maintained. The daily testing log was reviewed during inspection and advised operator to use sheet for one pour of high level disinfectant and in the event of a fail test or end of 14 days re-use period begin with new sheet and start with day one (new pour day).Ensure daily testing results are correctly logged in the daily monitoring testing log.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • Operator knowledge about the contact time, and re-use period of high-level disinfectant was noted being limited. Contact time, re-use period and manufacturer instructions for use of a disinfectant were discussed during inspection onsite.Ensure the manufacturer instructions for use of a disinfectant is fully reviewed and understood prior to its use. Follow contact time to achieve adequate disinfection of the semi-critical tools.
    • 25. Are the equipment manufacturer's instructions for use of specific equipment available and followed?
      • 1-Manuals for hydra-facial, ultrasonic cavitation equipment were not readily available during inspection. Obtain the manuals for all equipment used in the facility and ensure these are accessible to operators.2-Bacteriostatic saline was being used to reconstitute Botox injections. Obtain preservative saline solution to reconstitute Botox injections.
    • 25. Are the equipment manufacturer's instructions for use of specific equipment available and followed?
      • 1-Dermal filler injections were noted being used in contradiction of "manufacturer instruction for use". Injection was noted being dispensed using single use syringes to serve more than one client. "Manufacturer instructions for use" from package were reviewed with operator and advised to use one package for one person as mentioned on the package.2-Botox vial was not labeled for its opening date to track 24 hours use period. Operator was advised to keep log of Botox vial and label the bottle to ensure the remaining content is discarded at the end of 24 hours period.
    • 33. Are general nuisance conditions, other than those noted in other violations, being prevented at this personal services facility (Non-Critical)?
      • 1-There was no thermometer to monitor the temperature of fridge where Botox injections were stored. Ensure temperature of the cooler is monitored and a thermometer is placed in the cooler.2-Wax container was noted in unsanitary condition. Wax spill was noted all over the surface of wax warmer equipment. Lids were sticky. Operator reportedly planning to replace the wasx warmer equipment.
  10. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  11. Demand Inspection

    0 infractions

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website