Skip to content
Loading map…

Kavita Brow Artist

584 Lewis Greens Drive NW Edmonton AB T5T 7N3 · Personal Services

Official record from Alberta →

Inspection summary

Kavita Brow Artist has been inspected 3 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since January 31, 2024. The most recent inspection, on February 8, 2024, found no infractions.

1 of 3 inspections on record found no infractions at all. No inspections are on record from the past 12 months. All recorded findings relate to upkeep, equipment or paperwork rather than direct infection-control risks to clients.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for clients. In personal service settings like salons, spas and tattoo studios, higher-risk findings are the ones that could spread infection from one client to the next, through broken skin, blood or instruments that were not properly cleaned and sterilized.

  • Equipment and utensilsLower risk

    Instruments, chairs, tables and footbaths must be made of materials that can be cleaned, kept in good repair and stored so they stay clean. Single-use items such as nail files, buffers, razors and needles must be thrown away after each client.

    Recorded 3 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on February 5, 2024. For example: Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?

  • Permits, records and postingLower risk

    Operating permits, client records, sterilization logs and required signage. Client records matter because they let health officials contact people if an infection is linked to the business.

    Recorded 2 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on February 5, 2024. For example: Are personal services workers at the facility maintaining client records and where applicable, sterility documentation corresponding to that client?

  • Other findingsLower risk

    Findings that do not fit the categories above, such as follow-ups that confirm an earlier violation was corrected, or requirements specific to this type of facility.

    Recorded once on January 31, 2024. For example: Are cosmetic products appropriate for their intended use and being handled properly?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

3 inspections

  1. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  2. Risk Management Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 12. Are personal services workers at the facility maintaining client records and where applicable, sterility documentation corresponding to that client?
      • No sterility assurance documentation for pre-stirile single use items were recorded with client record.Maintain records of sterility assurance documentation with each client.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • 3- No high level disinfectant daily test record was available for review.
  3. Monitoring Inspection

    4 infractions

    • 12. Are personal services workers at the facility maintaining client records and where applicable, sterility documentation corresponding to that client?
      • No sterility assurance documentation for pre-stirile single use items were recorded with client record.Maintain records of sterility assurance documentation with each client.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • 1- High level disinfectant cs20 did not have expiry date on the container. Portion of the label containing expiry date was removed.Obtain new bottle of high-level disinfectant with valid expiry date and disinfect the tools prior to offer any service with semi-critical tools.2- High level disinfectant test strips container did not have expiry date on it. The part of the label containing expiry date was removed.Obtain test strips with valid expiry date for daily testing of high level disinfectant.3- No high level disinfectant daily test record was available for review.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • Operator was not following manufacturer instruction for use for disinfectants. contact time for CS20 was reported as 10 min. The label of the disinfectant was reviewed during inspection onsite.Read the label of the disinfectant prior to its use for its contact time, reuse period and concentration.
    • 26. Are cosmetic products appropriate for their intended use and being handled properly?
      • Manufacturer instruction for use for cosmetics were not being followed. The cosmetic products were labelled with their expiry dates.Ensure the products are labeled with their expiry date after first opening.

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website